100xOdds
100xOdds
  • Threads: 642
  • Posts: 4310
Joined: Feb 5, 2012
March 18th, 2024 at 10:45:37 AM permalink
2.2% house edge based on Ante bet.
But it's really 1.1% HE based on total initial bet.

So why is it considered 2.2%?

Edit:
Mods, pls change title to say Ante+Blinds instead of ante/blinds
Craps is paradise (Pair of dice). Lets hear it for the SpeedCount Mathletes :)
Mental
Mental
  • Threads: 13
  • Posts: 1306
Joined: Dec 10, 2018
Thanked by
odiousgambit100xOdds
March 18th, 2024 at 12:16:01 PM permalink
Quote: 100xOdds

2.2% house edge based on Ante bet.
But it's really 1.1% HE based on total initial bet.

So why is it considered 2.2%?

Edit:
Mods, pls change title to say Ante+Blinds instead of ante/blinds
link to original post

Or just say UTH has a RTP=99.27% and forget about the arbitrariness of HE definitions.

The HE is used by the pit to rate the player. Maybe the first pit boss who had to deal with this problem decided to use 2.2% of an ante bet to rate the players theoretical loss, and that is what stuck. If you play UTH online, you just click either the ante or blind circles and the matching bet is placed in the other circle automatically. It is always a forced matching bet. So this is different than BJ, where the player can decline to double or split where it is called for by basic strategy.

I think it is better for the players in general if the pit boss thinks of UTH as a 2.2% HE game versus 1.1% HE or 0.73% RTP.
This forum is more enjoyable after I learned how to use the 'Block this user' button.
jml24
jml24
  • Threads: 2
  • Posts: 295
Joined: Feb 28, 2011
March 18th, 2024 at 1:27:50 PM permalink
I think it's just a convention to calculate the HE in terms of the basic bet unit. As the Wizard notes in the game write-up on WOO, it is probably more appropriate to look at the element of risk anyway. I agree with Mental's previous answer that it is better for the casino management to be thinking about the 2.2% number.
DRich
DRich
  • Threads: 86
  • Posts: 11733
Joined: Jul 6, 2012
Thanked by
Hunterhill
March 18th, 2024 at 2:31:08 PM permalink
Quote: Mental



I think it is better for the players in general if the pit boss thinks of UTH as a 2.2% HE game versus 1.1% HE or 0.73% RTP.



From my experience the pit doesn't use the actual HE, they inflate it based on how typical players will do.
At my age, a "Life In Prison" sentence is not much of a deterrent.
Wizard
Administrator
Wizard
  • Threads: 1493
  • Posts: 26512
Joined: Oct 14, 2009
Thanked by
100xOdds
March 18th, 2024 at 4:26:14 PM permalink
The Element of Risk is good for comparing games against each other for value.

The house edge is good at estimating player loss per hour. I believe in basing it on the base wager. If it's unclear what the base wager is, it is whatever the table minimum applies to. In the case of UTH is is just the Ante.
"For with much wisdom comes much sorrow." -- Ecclesiastes 1:18 (NIV)
aceside
aceside
  • Threads: 2
  • Posts: 479
Joined: May 14, 2021
March 19th, 2024 at 11:00:21 AM permalink
Another reason probably is that UTH is often accompanied by several side bets. It makes more sense to use the same base wager as the common reference to compare the house edges from the main game and its side bets.
100xOdds
100xOdds
  • Threads: 642
  • Posts: 4310
Joined: Feb 5, 2012
March 20th, 2024 at 3:14:37 PM permalink
Quote: Mental

I think it is better for the players in general if the pit boss thinks of UTH as a 2.2% HE game versus 1.1% HE or 0.73% RTP.
link to original post


At one casino I'm at, I estimate i got 1.375 pts for each $10 hand.
I didn't play trips.

1.375/$10 is 13.75%.
This casino for that session rated me as if the game was 13.75% HE?? :o

Am I calc'ing wrong?
Craps is paradise (Pair of dice). Lets hear it for the SpeedCount Mathletes :)
  • Jump to: