lilredrooster
lilredrooster
Joined: May 8, 2015
  • Threads: 177
  • Posts: 3715
Thanks for this post from:
OnceDearAxelWolfCyrusV
June 29th, 2019 at 12:43:44 PM permalink
sir: the very experienced posters here know that your system cannot win in the long run

if you choose to think they are wrong - that's fine

but you are not going to convince anyone here

if you could prove that your system was a winner - that would be one of the biggest news stories of the decade
𝘣𝘦𝘭𝘪𝘦𝘷𝘦 𝘰𝘯𝘭𝘺 𝘩𝘢𝘭𝘧 𝘰𝘧 𝘸𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘺𝘰𝘶 𝘴𝘦𝘦 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘯𝘰𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘺𝘰𝘶 𝘩𝘦𝘢𝘳.........𝖤𝖽𝗀𝖺𝗋 𝖠𝗅𝗅𝖺𝗇 𝖯𝗈𝖾
sabre
sabre 
Joined: Aug 16, 2010
  • Threads: 2
  • Posts: 1136
Thanks for this post from:
AxelWolf
June 29th, 2019 at 4:17:11 PM permalink
Quote: Anunnaki1202

You will not use antimartingale all time as the game will be most of the time off balanced
You can stop playing at anytime when on + and consider it as a session.



If I had to program a bot to detect stupid gambling systems the first lines of code would be

if system.contains_word("session")
then system = garbage
billryan
billryan
Joined: Nov 2, 2009
  • Threads: 182
  • Posts: 11001
June 29th, 2019 at 4:29:26 PM permalink
Quote: Anunnaki1202

Ok fellas I explain the system is nothing to hide because I don't have the tools to test it.

As we know the baccarat game always something is upfront player of banker.
Before we enter to play the game we waiting for one side to be upfront something like 3 games because in 3 games one side is upfront. Ok that's good banker is with 2 player 1 or whatever has 2 games out or even 3 same out.
All this I call into a balance one side will grow then will drop back on perfect balance and switching the other side.
Now the catch is to use flat bet and we apply antimartingale when is dropping back on the perfect balance and trying to switch the side
But this antimartingale needs to reset when on profit cannot be left to keep go up till will lose.

Please let me know what you think about it.



I think you should be glad you don't have the tools to test it.
Anunnaki1202
Anunnaki1202
Joined: Jun 29, 2016
  • Threads: 2
  • Posts: 36
June 29th, 2019 at 5:42:43 PM permalink
Ok.
Thanks for your opinion! Did you test it ? Show me the results
And I believe you!
Where there's a will, there is a way
7craps
7craps
Joined: Jan 23, 2010
  • Threads: 18
  • Posts: 1977
June 29th, 2019 at 5:52:07 PM permalink
Quote: Anunnaki1202

Ok.
Thanks for your opinion! Did you test it ? Show me the results

the ONLY way that you will believe anyone's simulations or calculated results
is for you and you only
to do the testing (learn to do it if you say you can't - can't means 'I do not want to")

as only that way will you believe will be with your own eyes what you just did.

others have spent $$millions on exactly this and not 1 has bankrupted any casino EVER from their contrived betting system.
why do you think that is so?

your ideas are also NOTHING NEW...
been there, been done before.

next great idea coming up!
bad. luck to you
winsome johnny (not Win some johnny)
Anunnaki1202
Anunnaki1202
Joined: Jun 29, 2016
  • Threads: 2
  • Posts: 36
June 29th, 2019 at 5:54:38 PM permalink
Ok.
Is all delays and repeats that's all there is.
Where there's a will, there is a way
OnceDear
Administrator
OnceDear
Joined: Jun 1, 2014
  • Threads: 46
  • Posts: 5317
Thanks for this post from:
AxelWolf
June 29th, 2019 at 9:31:53 PM permalink
Quote: Anunnaki1202

Ok.
Is all delays and repeats that's all there is.

Go use your system. Go get rich, then come back, buy the forum and ban all those members who refused to have faith in you.

No. We won't test your system. Our time is precious too.
Beware. The earth is NOT flat. Hit and run is not a winning strategy: Pressing into trends IS not a winning strategy: Progressives are not a winning strategy: Don't Buy It! .Don't even take it for free.
michael99000
michael99000
Joined: Jul 10, 2010
  • Threads: 9
  • Posts: 2112
June 29th, 2019 at 10:45:33 PM permalink
Quote: Anunnaki1202

Ok.
Is all delays and repeats that's all there is.




I tested it tonight. I won a huge amount of money. It works !!

You should’ve seen the crowd gathered around me, they were in awe as I doubled my bet after each loss.
Anunnaki1202
Anunnaki1202
Joined: Jun 29, 2016
  • Threads: 2
  • Posts: 36
June 30th, 2019 at 6:53:58 AM permalink
Well ... my friends please don't bother to reply anymore.
Now you all know the "Off balanced" system
Progression can use whatever you want with it ... when falls into the perfect balance.
But flat bets need to be used as the regular bets
Where there's a will, there is a way
ThatDonGuy
ThatDonGuy
Joined: Jun 22, 2011
  • Threads: 101
  • Posts: 4837
June 30th, 2019 at 9:17:00 AM permalink
Quote: Anunnaki1202

Now you all know the "Off balanced" system


That's the problem - I don't think anybody here knows exactly how it works.
Here's how I think it works - but instead of player and banker in baccarat, I am going to use red and black in roulette, since it should work the same way.

1. Watch three (non-green) spins without betting, and count the number of reds and the number of blacks. There are four possible results:
(a) Three reds - I will call this +3 red, since red has won three more times than black
(b) Two reds and a black - this is +1 red
(c) Two blacks and a red - this is +1 black
(d) Three blacks - this is +3 black

2. Bet 1 on the plus side, and keep betting 1 on the plus side until either you are ahead for the session (which will happen if you win your first bet), in which case you start over with step 1, or the game achieves balance.
Note that if you started betting at +3, you will be ahead if it ever gets to +4 before it gets to balance.

3. If it gets to balance and you are still behind, skip one bet so it is now wither +1 red or +1 black, then start Martingaling (bet 1 on the plus side, then keep doubling your bets) until you are ahead.

There is one thing I am not sure of: if you start doubling your bets and it gets back to balance, what do you do - do you skip a bet and then double your previous bet, or do you go back to betting 1?

Here's an example:
The first three spins are all red, so the count is +3 Red
You bet 1 on red, and lose; you are -1 for your session, and the count is +2 Red
You bet 1 on red, and lose again; you are -2 for your session, and the count is +1 Red
You bet 1 on red, and win; you are -1 for your session, and the count is +2 Red
You bet 1 on red, and lose; you are -2 for your session, and the count is +1 Red
You bet 1 on red, and lose; you are -3 for your session, and the count is Balance
You skip the next spin, which is black; the count is +1 Black
You bet on 1 on black, and win; you are -2 for your session, and the count is Balance
You skip the next spin, which is red; the count is +1 Red
What is your next bet - 2, since you are Martingaling (or, as you say, "antimartingaling"), or 1, since it reached balance?

  • Jump to: