zrlcsx
zrlcsx
  • Threads: 4
  • Posts: 21
Joined: May 8, 2015
May 11th, 2018 at 12:44:12 PM permalink
I am a fan of UTH and count the outs when deciding to fold or bet 1x (fold if 21 or over). I have looked at all possible hand and have not found a hand that has exactly 21 outs. Can anyone verify this or show me a hand with 21 outs?
Chuck
JB
Administrator
JB
  • Threads: 334
  • Posts: 2089
Joined: Oct 14, 2009
May 11th, 2018 at 1:20:57 PM permalink
You: Q3
Board: K974 3

The dealer outs are the 9 hearts and a 4, 7, 9, or K in any of the other 3 suits = 9 + (4*3) = 9 + 12 = 21
zrlcsx
zrlcsx
  • Threads: 4
  • Posts: 21
Joined: May 8, 2015
May 11th, 2018 at 2:17:21 PM permalink
The two threes would also be dealer outs. But i can see where with my hand with and Ace instead of Queen there would indeed be 21 outs.

I should have clarified my original question. I was looking at hands where all i had was a kicker (no pair).
Chuck
JB
Administrator
JB
  • Threads: 334
  • Posts: 2089
Joined: Oct 14, 2009
May 11th, 2018 at 2:52:56 PM permalink
A dealer 3 only wins if they have an Ace kicker.

The whole point of the "21 outs" strategy is to only consider one-card outs.

"If the dealer has X and Y" is not a one-card out.
zrlcsx
zrlcsx
  • Threads: 4
  • Posts: 21
Joined: May 8, 2015
May 12th, 2018 at 9:11:56 AM permalink
Your're right, i was confused and thinking the dealers king would out kick me. Forgetting that the king is mine also, my K Q outkicks dealers K 9.
Chuck
gordonm888
Administrator
gordonm888
  • Threads: 61
  • Posts: 5359
Joined: Feb 18, 2015
May 12th, 2018 at 9:35:16 AM permalink
Quote: JB

You: Q3
Board: K974 3

The dealer outs are the 9 hearts and a 4, 7, 9, or K in any of the other 3 suits = 9 + (4*3) = 9 + 12 = 21



You: Q3
Board: K974 3
Raise EV = -1.9909

However, if you change the 4 to 5

You: Q3
Board: K975 3
Raise EV = -2.0273

I always find these kind of close-call hands interesting to know.
So many better men, a few of them friends, are dead. And a thousand thousand slimy things live on, and so do I.
Ibeatyouraces
Ibeatyouraces
  • Threads: 68
  • Posts: 11933
Joined: Jan 12, 2010
May 12th, 2018 at 9:54:51 AM permalink
Quote: gordonm888

Quote: JB

You: Q3
Board: K974 3

The dealer outs are the 9 hearts and a 4, 7, 9, or K in any of the other 3 suits = 9 + (4*3) = 9 + 12 = 21



You: Q3
Board: K974 3
Raise EV = -1.9909

However, if you change the 4 to 5

You: Q3
Board: K975 3
Raise EV = -2.0273

I always find these kind of close-call hands interesting to know.


More possible dealer straights by changing the 4 to a 5
DUHHIIIIIIIII HEARD THAT!
zrlcsx
zrlcsx
  • Threads: 4
  • Posts: 21
Joined: May 8, 2015
May 12th, 2018 at 9:58:17 AM permalink
Quote: JB

You: Q3
Board: K974 3

The dealer outs are the 9 hearts and a 4, 7, 9, or K in any of the other 3 suits = 9 + (4*3) = 9 + 12 = 21



This hand brings up a unique situation. Requardless of my kicker to the three there are always 21 outs (I think). Yet only Q or Ace kicker have an expected value greater than the minus 2 for folding.

Values from calculator on wizzards site. ( are you the JB that developed that application? )

A3 = -1.976
Q3 = -1.991
J3 = -2.006
103 = -2.021
83 = -2.036

The wizards basic strategy says to bet 1x with a hidden pair ( I understand it is not optimal). A simple tweak would be to fold low pair with 4 flush on board. Not sure it is practical to devise a rule for when to bet low pair with four flush on board.
Chuck
JB
Administrator
JB
  • Threads: 334
  • Posts: 2089
Joined: Oct 14, 2009
Thanked by
zrlcsx
May 12th, 2018 at 6:42:15 PM permalink
Quote: zrlcsx

[This hand brings up a unique situation. Requardless of my kicker to the three there are always 21 outs (I think). Yet only Q or Ace kicker have an expected value greater than the minus 2 for folding.

Values from calculator on wizzards site. ( are you the JB that developed that application? )

A3 = -1.976
Q3 = -1.991
J3 = -2.006
103 = -2.021
83 = -2.036

The wizards basic strategy says to bet 1x with a hidden pair ( I understand it is not optimal). A simple tweak would be to fold low pair with 4 flush on board. Not sure it is practical to devise a rule for when to bet low pair with four flush on board.


Yes.

For this question I just threw together some code which searched for 21 outs by shuffling, dealing the player's 2 cards + the 5 board cards, iterating through every possible remaining card as if it were the dealer's only card, and determining who won (your best 5-of-7 hand versus the dealer's best 5-of-6 hand).

All of the 21-out situations appear to meet the following criteria:
- You have a pair (pocket, or you paired a board card)
- There is a 4-flush on board
- 4 of the 5 ranks on the board, if paired, would beat your pair

Back to your original question, I don't think there are (I didn't find) any situations where you have Ace-high or lower and the dealer has exactly 21 outs.
zrlcsx
zrlcsx
  • Threads: 4
  • Posts: 21
Joined: May 8, 2015
May 13th, 2018 at 4:55:52 AM permalink
First i wanted to thank you for the calculator. It is my go to for helping me tweak my approach to playing UTH.

Another question. Where does the 21 outs come from? I am assuming it predicts the dealer's chances of beating you. I tried to calculate it and came up with 75.76%. The dealer will beat you 75.76% of the time, not accounting for filling a three card straight or flush. The actual chance would be slightly higher when there is a three card straight or flush on the board.
Chuck
CharmedQuark
CharmedQuark
  • Threads: 8
  • Posts: 56
Joined: Apr 28, 2015
May 13th, 2018 at 9:59:18 AM permalink
to zrlcsx - - I copied this from another post on this forum - per teliot

Here is my rough-justice proof of the "21 outs" statement in Mike's strategy. Clearly if the player folds, then his EV is -2.

Let N be the number of outs under consideration for the dealer to beat the player. Then the probability that the dealer’s first card is an out is p = N/45. For his second card, the dealer who whiffed on his first card most likely has 3 additional “pair outs” to pair his first card and beat the player. He may also generate new straight or flush outs (call these 1 additional “out,” so-called “runner-runner”). So, the probability of the dealer beating the player by hitting an out on his second card is approximately (N + 4)/44.

Overall, the probability that the dealer beats the player is then,
p = N/45 + [(45 – N)/45]*[(N + 4)/44].
Simplifying, we get:
p = (-N^2 + 85 N + 180)/(45*44)

Note that if the dealer doesn’t hit an out, then he won’t qualify. It follows that the EV for the player who raises 1x on the Turn/River bet is:
EV = p*(-3) + (1-p)*(1) = 1 – 4p.

We make the raise whenever EV > -2. That is, 1 – 4p > -2. Solving for p gives
p < 3/4.
That is, the player raises 1x when his chance of beating the dealer is 25% or higher.

Combining the two expressions for p, we see that EV > -2 when
(-N^2 + 85 N + 180)/(45*44) < 3/4.
Simplifying gives the quadratic inequality,
N^2 – 85N + 1305 > 0
Solving the quadratic equation gives roots:
(1/2)*(85 + sqrt(2005)) = 64.9
(1/2)*(85 – sqrt(2005)) = 20.1

For the quadratic equation to be positive, N must be either larger than both roots or smaller than both roots. That is, either N ≥ 65 or N ≤ 20. The first case is the “impossible solution,” leading to the conclusion that there can be at most 20 dealer outs that can beat the player.
  • Jump to: