arsonist
arsonist
  • Threads: 2
  • Posts: 3
Joined: Jun 13, 2015
January 31st, 2016 at 9:52:50 AM permalink
Hello, i am using the Equation of pushing a little bit and i want to discuss a strategy, and help me with the maths.

At pokerstars, In 0,05/0.10 zoom omaha game, (10$ buy in ) , If you REpot (1 person who raised the pot ), he folds 7/10 of the times(they are bad players and afraid of aces).
So from EV equation: F(POT)+C(W$W%)-C(L$L%)= 0,7(1,70)+0,3(0,5*2,55)-0,3(0,5*1.20)=1,19+0,38-0,18=1,39$
So every time i do REpot in one person, i win in long time 1,39 dollars?


Pot=0,05(sb)+0,10(bb)+0,35(raiser)+1,20(repot)=1,70
W$=1,20+1,20+0,15=2,55
L$=1,20
L%=W%= I am giving a chance 50% in both, cause at omaha game, they are a lot of loose calls, and if u are not completly dominated u ve got 40% equity, so i am giving to me and the other guy, 50%-50% equity.

So, Its my equation and logic right? Its profitable to repot them (1 time, 1 guy, those stakes) Anytime?
Or i ve got a misstype in mathematics or misslogic?

Plus, if i add an equation about C-bet in almost every flop , its profitable when i am the preflop aggresor? , and how many times he will fold.
Romes
Romes
  • Threads: 29
  • Posts: 5612
Joined: Jul 22, 2014
February 5th, 2016 at 6:58:53 AM permalink
Poker can be (should be) a bit more dynamic than an equation can handle. If you're at my table and I've figured out after 20 minutes that you always just re-pop, well then I'm going to start re-re-popping you back, chunking you your re-pop every time. Others can/will figure out the same and your equation thus goes out the window.
Playing it correctly means you've already won.
arsonist
arsonist
  • Threads: 2
  • Posts: 3
Joined: Jun 13, 2015
February 6th, 2016 at 8:14:04 AM permalink
Quote: Romes

Poker can be (should be) a bit more dynamic than an equation can handle. If you're at my table and I've figured out after 20 minutes that you always just re-pop, well then I'm going to start re-re-popping you back, chunking you your re-pop every time. Others can/will figure out the same and your equation thus goes out the window.



Obv, we talk about zoom omaha game, almost different players ever hand, and its pretty theoritical this equation
Wanted to see if mathematics actually was right
AxelWolf
AxelWolf
  • Threads: 169
  • Posts: 22585
Joined: Oct 10, 2012
February 7th, 2016 at 9:08:10 AM permalink
Quote: Romes

Poker can be (should be) a bit more dynamic than an equation can handle. If you're at my table and I've figured out after 20 minutes that you always just re-pop, well then I'm going to start re-re-popping you back, chunking you your re-pop every time. Others can/will figure out the same and your equation thus goes out the window.

You understand what he's talking about with the zoom poker? You move to a different table with different players and immediately dealt in after each hand or as soon as you fold. It's hard to get a real read on people. Also if this is at BV they don't use players names so a program or players log doesn't help.

side note: Someone actually figured an easy way to get around BV's anonymous system.

His theory is interesting, i'm interested in knowing the answer. It seems like a bot could do well using a formula like this.
♪♪Now you swear and kick and beg us That you're not a gamblin' man Then you find you're back in Vegas With a handle in your hand♪♪ Your black cards can make you money So you hide them when you're able In the land of casinos and money You must put them on the table♪♪ You go back Jack do it again roulette wheels turinin' 'round and 'round♪♪ You go back Jack do it again♪♪
  • Jump to: