This sounds like an urban myth, or a casino myth, to me. What's up with his idea? Thanks for any help to set me or him straight.
Quote: bigjohnof406I have a friend who claims that baccarat is a loser for casinos in that players can (and do, he claims) win so much that they break the bank.....
This sounds like an urban myth, or a casino myth, to me. What's up with his idea? Thanks for any help to set me or him straight.
He's wrong.
The average monthly percentage of the money gambled on Baccarat that the casinos retained (the Hold), was 12.01% in Nevada from 2004 - 2015.
Nevada Table Games
Quote: ontariodealerour casino thrives on the bacc action.
As does ours, in Alberta.
Quote: TankoHe's wrong.
The average monthly percentage of the money gambled on Baccarat that the casinos retained (the Hold), was 12.01% in Nevada from 2004 - 2015.
Nevada Table Games
Interesting that I see this figure quoted in another thread as well.
However, from government report issued in Macao, that figure is more like 3%, which is a lot closer to the theoretical hold.
Wonder why Vegas's figure is so high.
Its two eggs scrambled, potatoes, coffee and the Bacc figures.
It aint never the Big Six Wheel figures.
Even casinos that go whaleless keep Bacc in place.
Quote: andysifHowever, from government report issued in Macao, that figure is more like 3%, which is a lot closer to the theoretical hold.
Wonder why Vegas's figure is so high.
According to This Article, the Baccarat hold in Macau is 15-17%.
The reported lower Macau hold of 3% may be due to different accounting practices.
Win/Total Drop (Nevada) vs. Win/Turnover (Macau)
Quote: WizardofnothingThe statement that casinos lose in baccarat would defy the basic principle of house edge and -ev
/\
||
||
THIS
Non-negotiable chips gives a win-rate of about 3% per non-negotiable, assuming a few Tie bets. That must be what they are referring to. NN's are the de-facto wagering instrument in the once dominant high-roller segment.Quote: TankoThe reported lower Macau hold of 3% may be due to different accounting practices.
Quote: teliotNon-negotiable chips gives a win-rate of about 3% per non-negotiable, assuming a few Tie bets. That must be what they are referring to. NN's are the de-facto wagering instrument in the once dominant high-roller segment.
I think this is the proper explanation of the 3% hold.
The next logical question would be: why the difference?
I don't think side bet alone could be accounted for an additional 10% hold. The simple fact is, baccarat side bet is just not that popular. I don't know what is the variance for baccarat hold, but 10% must be 6 or 7 SD away from the mean.
Conspiracy theory: NN chips is traceable and well accounted for, while normal play is relatively hard to track. I wonder how many of that 10% is really from "other sources".
Because the measurements are done in different ways. When you are using NN's you get one number (as above), where "hold" is synonymous with house edge. When you use cash chips you get another definition of "hold" (Win/Drop). The word "hold" is used in both ways in the industry, thus the confusion.Quote: andysifThe next logical question would be: why the difference?
Here is the rub for those who care. Bac in Vegas in my opinion is very very liberal to the point of being absurd. Given that so many folks lose in this game it would be advantageous for Vegas to offer these liberal conditions. For now I am sure. As for Macau not so in various locations. Various Macau casinos prohibit you from recording the game where it is usually the norm everywhere else. You must rely on that electronic scoreboard. When asked about this the answer given doesn't even jive and a brush off reply of "This is policy." and that was as far as the inquiry goes. Pretty darn cryptic.