June 22nd, 2010 at 2:29:25 PM
permalink
This is directed to the Wizard, but anyone is welcome to show me where my logic is incorrect.
On your craps page, you have the following tip:
"Tip: If you must bet on a 7, don’t make the any 7 bet, with a house edge of 16.67%. Instead, divide your bet by 3, and put 1/3 each on the 1-6, 2-5, and 3-4 hop bets. Even at the stingy payoff of 15 to 1, you will still lower the house edge to 11.11%."
While I agree betting on the 7 in general is a terrible bet, I cannot agree with this tip.
The problem I see with this tip is that it does not factor in that in order to win a hopped 7 bet, 2 of your bets are guaranteed losers. In effect, this lowers the house payout to 13 to 1 or "14 FOR 1". The any seven bet would pay 4 to 1 or "5 FOR 1" on a bet 3 times larger for a net of an additional unit (5*3=15 units instead of 14 units).
From a simple example:
If you bet $12 on an any 7 bet paying 4 to 1 and a 7 is rolled, the bet will win you $48, plus you will keep your original wager of $12 for a total of $60 in your pocket after a win.
If you take the same $12 and spread it across the 3 hop bets at $4 a piece and the 2-5 comes out, you will win $60 on the 2-5 hop bet, retain the $4 from the 2-5 hop bet for a total of $64. However, you win also lose the $4 on each of the 1-6 and 3-4 bets, leaving you with a net of $56.
While I agree betting a single hop bet has a better statistical edge, I do not agree that if you intend to play "any 7" it is better to wager on the individual hop bets, because of the guaranteed losses that come with a win.
Please let me know where this logic is incorrect.
On your craps page, you have the following tip:
"Tip: If you must bet on a 7, don’t make the any 7 bet, with a house edge of 16.67%. Instead, divide your bet by 3, and put 1/3 each on the 1-6, 2-5, and 3-4 hop bets. Even at the stingy payoff of 15 to 1, you will still lower the house edge to 11.11%."
While I agree betting on the 7 in general is a terrible bet, I cannot agree with this tip.
The problem I see with this tip is that it does not factor in that in order to win a hopped 7 bet, 2 of your bets are guaranteed losers. In effect, this lowers the house payout to 13 to 1 or "14 FOR 1". The any seven bet would pay 4 to 1 or "5 FOR 1" on a bet 3 times larger for a net of an additional unit (5*3=15 units instead of 14 units).
From a simple example:
If you bet $12 on an any 7 bet paying 4 to 1 and a 7 is rolled, the bet will win you $48, plus you will keep your original wager of $12 for a total of $60 in your pocket after a win.
If you take the same $12 and spread it across the 3 hop bets at $4 a piece and the 2-5 comes out, you will win $60 on the 2-5 hop bet, retain the $4 from the 2-5 hop bet for a total of $64. However, you win also lose the $4 on each of the 1-6 and 3-4 bets, leaving you with a net of $56.
While I agree betting a single hop bet has a better statistical edge, I do not agree that if you intend to play "any 7" it is better to wager on the individual hop bets, because of the guaranteed losses that come with a win.
Please let me know where this logic is incorrect.
June 22nd, 2010 at 2:39:43 PM
permalink
Win Any 7: Start with $12, end up with $60.
Win one of Hop bets: Start with $12, end up with $64.
Either way, a non-7 results in a $12 loss.
Your analysis sounds a lot like the bogus explanation in the old story of three men renting a hotel room.
Win one of Hop bets: Start with $12, end up with $64.
Either way, a non-7 results in a $12 loss.
Your analysis sounds a lot like the bogus explanation in the old story of three men renting a hotel room.
June 22nd, 2010 at 5:53:18 PM
permalink
Quote: dcapone
If you take the same $12 and spread it across the 3 hop bets at $4 a piece and the 2-5 comes out, you will win $60 on the 2-5 hop bet, retain the $4 from the 2-5 hop bet for a total of $64. However, you win also lose the $4 on each of the 1-6 and 3-4 bets, leaving you with a net of $56.
In your pocket, you will have $64 by betting the three hops, not $56.
Unless you know for sure that the next roll will be Big Red, a better play would be to put it all on the Pass or Come. If a seven (or eleven) you double up, but if not 2,3,12, you have another shot to double by hitting a point.
Simplicity is the ultimate sophistication - Leonardo da Vinci
June 22nd, 2010 at 6:21:38 PM
permalink
Quote: dcapone
If you take the same $12 and spread it across the 3 hop bets at $4 a piece and the 2-5 comes out, you will win $60 on the 2-5 hop bet, retain the $4 from the 2-5 hop bet for a total of $64. However, you win also lose the $4 on each of the 1-6 and 3-4 bets, leaving you with a net of $56.
Please let me know where this logic is incorrect.
You don't net 56, you net 64. it's 12-4-4+60=64.
"So as the clock ticked and the day passed, opportunity met preparation, and luck happened." - Maurice Clarett
June 22nd, 2010 at 7:05:53 PM
permalink
yep, I am an idiot...wanted to pay the house twice on those losses.
You can tell I have never made this bet or it would have been obvious.
You can tell I have never made this bet or it would have been obvious.
June 22nd, 2010 at 7:21:25 PM
permalink
You're not an idiot.
You just needed a slap in the head.
Here ya go:
Admin note: removed image www.djteddybear.com/images/homer_doh.jpg
You just needed a slap in the head.
Here ya go:
Admin note: removed image www.djteddybear.com/images/homer_doh.jpg
I invented a few casino games. Info:
http://www.DaveMillerGaming.com/ —————————————————————————————————————
Superstitions are silly, childish, irrational rituals, born out of fear of the unknown. But how much does it cost to knock on wood? 😁