FanDuel has since dropped it to 37.5 as of this post.
The wind is expected to maintain 25-30 mph during the game, with gust up to 60mph at times. Twitter is already filled with pics and videos from pre-game.
I look for this one to be waaaaaaaaay under.
Quote: WizardIn sports betting, I like to a contrarian. If the masses are on the under, then the line probably moved too much. I'd put a small fun wager on the over if I had an out.
link to original post
I typically agree, however, before the weather became so public (thanks to social media) and the line was still at 42, the majority of the tickets were on the over while the majority of the money was on the under. That is what made me take the under so early. Now that I have a 4.5 point cushion, I like my chances.
Both teams have strong run games and can sink and dunk. And don’t discount the loss of White to the Bills Run D.
We’ll see.
Quote: WizardIn sports betting, I like to a contrarian. If the masses are on the under, then the line probably moved too much. I'd put a small fun wager on the over if I had an out.
link to original post
Wiz, have you ever looked at the data on that? Say if opening line is 2.5 different than closing line, and you bet against move at closing line, what the results are?
I’ve always heard that if the move isn’t injury driven than the people setting the line are smarter than the betting public. Though that flies in the face of the concept of closing line value also . . .
Quote: unJonWiz, have you ever looked at the data on that? Say if opening line is 2.5 different than closing line, and you bet against move at closing line, what the results are?
I’ve always heard that if the move isn’t injury driven than the people setting the line are smarter than the betting public. Though that flies in the face of the concept of closing line value also . . .
link to original post
I've looked at data that shows the difference between the final score and the line is smaller using closing lines than opening. However, that data does not address the reason for the line movement.
My opinion, and I have nothing to prove it, is the masses overreact to everything. For example, a star player getting benched for deflating the football or beating his wife. As to weather, I think the public also overreacts to games in extreme weather. Wind is the most important factor, when it comes to weather, affecting outdoors sports, so they are right to factor that in, but the masses over-factor it. Cold weather, rain, and snow, I think do not affect football much.
Quote: WizardQuote: unJonWiz, have you ever looked at the data on that? Say if opening line is 2.5 different than closing line, and you bet against move at closing line, what the results are?
I’ve always heard that if the move isn’t injury driven than the people setting the line are smarter than the betting public. Though that flies in the face of the concept of closing line value also . . .
link to original post
I've looked at data that shows the difference between the final score and the line is smaller using closing lines than opening. However, that data does not address the reason for the line movement.
My opinion, and I have nothing to prove it, is the masses overreact to everything. For example, a star player getting benched for deflating the football or beating his wife. As to weather, I think the public also overreacts to games in extreme weather. Wind is the most important factor, when it comes to weather, affecting outdoors sports, so they are right to factor that in, but the masses over-factor it. Cold weather, rain, and snow, I think do not affect football much.
link to original post
I'd consider myself an above average sports bettor. Not an average joe, but not a sharp either. I see a lot fo value in fading the public and following the money, not the tickets. I love games where 20-25% of the tickets but close to 50% of the money is on a side. That tells me I am on the side of the sharps AND the sports books.
That was my reason for taking under at 42. I agree with the Wiz, the public couldve completely overreacted to this weather when it become public and thus the line moved almost 5 points. I'm just glad to be in at 42.
Quote: unJonI hear you and you got CLV so that’s great. But the line opened at 46 so you missed 4 points. Hopefully you got in before the overreaction! Anyway, good luck. I just saw a stat that Allen’s QB rating is higher when the wind speed at kickoff is 20+mph than when it’s below that.
link to original post
The flaw of following the sharps is you also lose a point or 2. You cant react before they do and once they do, youve likely lost points!
Quote: Marcusclark66Both teams are from the exact same weather they are playing in. It’s not like the Dolphins or say the Cowboys playing at the Bills or The Patriots stadium.
link to original post[/ql
I dont care if you live in Antarica, throwing or kicking a football in 20-60 mph winds isnt easy!
Quote: mwalz9Quote: Marcusclark66Both teams are from the exact same weather they are playing in. It’s not like the Dolphins or say the Cowboys playing at the Bills or The Patriots stadium.
link to original post
I dont care if you live in Antarica, throwing or kicking a football in 20-60 mph winds isnt easy!
link to original post
Not worried, the Pats will show the Bills how it’s done.
Glad I have about 250 TVs at work.
Won the Pats.
Lost the Over.
Won my side bet Pats score first.
+ $500.00 jingle jingle.
Quote: mwalz9Under cashed easily!
link to original post
Great cash.
Question: Where are you getting these numbers from?Quote: mwalz9
I love games where 20-25% of the tickets but close to 50% of the money is on a side. That tells me I am on the side of the sharps AND the sports books.
There was a discussion regarding this (amount of money on each side, handle, etc. for each NFL game) in another handicapping forum. The consensus of the forum was, wherever you are getting these numbers from, the data is not reliable... and in fact is most likely "made up."
Mathew Holt, the ex sportbook manager at the Westgate, said that no sportsbook ever will give out their transaction log to any 3rd party ever. Ditto the current sportsbook manager over at Boyd Gaming, Bob Scucci. Anyone who thinks they are getting real sportsbook figures (handle and ticket counts) is delirious.
There is no gaming entity in Vegas, the Caribbean or Europe that just opens their ledger to the general public. Think about it. These are publicly traded companies. Their daily transactional ledger is not public information and never will be.
IF a major sportsbook wanted to publish this data, they'd publish it on their own website, and not let a 3rd party do it.
The fact of the matter is all of the handle and ticket counts and percentages are nothing more than "gimmicks." They are published for the sole reason of enticing you to place a bet on either side. No sports book is just handing out their data. Nor are they charging for it. They wouldn't do it even if they were allowed.
Quote: EdCollinsQuestion: Where are you getting these numbers from?Quote: mwalz9
I love games where 20-25% of the tickets but close to 50% of the money is on a side. That tells me I am on the side of the sharps AND the sports books.
There was a discussion regarding this (amount of money on each side, handle, etc. for each NFL game) in another handicapping forum. The consensus of the forum was, wherever you are getting these numbers from, the data is not reliable... and in fact is most likely "made up."
Mathew Holt, the ex sportbook manager at the Westgate, said that no sportsbook ever will give out their transaction log to any 3rd party ever. Ditto the current sportsbook manager over at Boyd Gaming, Bob Scucci. Anyone who thinks they are getting real sportsbook figures (handle and ticket counts) is delirious.
There is no gaming entity in Vegas, the Caribbean or Europe that just opens their ledger to the general public. Think about it. These are publicly traded companies. Their daily transactional ledger is not public information and never will be.
IF a major sportsbook wanted to publish this data, they'd publish it on their own website, and not let a 3rd party do it.
The fact of the matter is all of the handle and ticket counts and percentages are nothing more than "gimmicks." They are published for the sole reason of enticing you to place a bet on either side. No sports book is just handing out their data. Nor are they charging for it. They wouldn't do it even if they were allowed.
link to original post
Pure spoken truth. Nice.
Please don’t explain why the casinos were thrilled to purchase, install and maintain all the score boards at tables games.
Let the majority believe what they so aggressively do about getting the ‘insight’ because of the board.
Quote: mwalz9I got in on the under early based on weather forecast at o/u 42 pts.
FanDuel has since dropped it to 37.5 as of this post.
The wind is expected to maintain 25-30 mph during the game, with gust up to 60mph at times. Twitter is already filled with pics and videos from pre-game.
I look for this one to be waaaaaaaaay under.
I am fairly confident FD was on 39.5 almost all afternoon. Obviously they had alternate lines on almost any number. 43.5 and 44.5 on parlay cards, so there is still something of value to be found on those things even if it is such a small fraction of what it was 10 years ago. Best quote I saw about this game was that there are some things the in play algorithms cannot account for.
Quote: EdCollinsThere was a discussion regarding this (amount of money on each side, handle, etc. for each NFL game) in another handicapping forum. The consensus of the forum was, wherever you are getting these numbers from, the data is not reliable... and in fact is most likely "made up."
Mathew Holt, the ex sportbook manager at the Westgate, said that no sportsbook ever will give out their transaction log to any 3rd party ever. Ditto the current sportsbook manager over at Boyd Gaming, Bob Scucci. Anyone who thinks they are getting real sportsbook figures (handle and ticket counts) is delirious.
There is no gaming entity in Vegas, the Caribbean or Europe that just opens their ledger to the general public. Think about it. These are publicly traded companies. Their daily transactional ledger is not public information and never will be.
IF a major sportsbook wanted to publish this data, they'd publish it on their own website, and not let a 3rd party do it.
The fact of the matter is all of the handle and ticket counts and percentages are nothing more than "gimmicks." They are published for the sole reason of enticing you to place a bet on either side. No sports book is just handing out their data. Nor are they charging for it. They wouldn't do it even if they were allowed.
Plenty of individual sportsbooks do not mind giving out this information to certain reporters as it will get them some media coverage. An ESPN reported putting an @CaesarsSports in a tweet is worth it to them. It doesn't mean letting them look at the books, it is just telling them something. They could lie about it, but I wouldn't think so. Definitely does not come close to representing the entire market.
It’s like a $50,000 jackpot giveaway, be one of 12 winners but they don’t tell you that there’s 45,000 people that lose when they come through the door and lose their bank roll waiting for the drawing to see if they won part of a $50,000 giveaway. Maybe that’s a bad example but I have to agree with you advertising, social media and marketing will always be truthful. LMAO
Same thing, our machines paid out more money than any other casino in the state. But they don’t tell you that our machines have also taken more money from players trying to win, than any other casino in the state. LMAO.
Quote: Marcusclark66Advertising, social media any other forms of marketing for a business are always truthful, always spot on and always verifiable, yeah sure.
If a sportsbook director goes on TV, the radio, or a podcast and says "our biggest liability this week is on the Chiefs", why would they lie? What is the downside for them? Does that change if they use actual numbers, (eg 80% of tickets)?
Quote: Marcusclark66You know you speak to one casino executive and he says, our Baccarat tables lose more money than any other tables in our casino. You speak to another casino executive at the same casino and he says, you know our baccarat tables win us more money than any of the other tables.
Are there examples of them saying this publicly in the media? Or is it only what they say to you in private and completely unrelated to reports of sports handle?