Magic laying 100 to win 310
76ers laying 100 to win 225
Wizards laying 100 to win 140
Pelicans laying 100 to win 210
Magic -100
76ers -100
Wizards +140
Pelicans +210
YTD:
Favorites -2388
Underdogs -543
Total -2931
Kings laying 100 to win 270
Clippers laying 100 to win 600
Nuggets laying 100 to win 130
Kings +270
Clippers -100
Nuggets +130
YTD:
Favorites -2388
Underdogs -243
Total -2631
Knicks laying 100 to win 220
Thunder laying 100 to win 255
Pacers laying 100 to win 140
76ers laying 100 to win 220
Trailblazers laying 100 to win 325
Knicks -100
Thunder -100
Pacers +140
76ers -100
Trailblazers -100
YTD:
Favorites -2388
Underdogs -503
Total -2891
Nets laying 100 to win 305
Suns laying 100 to win 145
Nets -100
Suns -100
YTD:
Favorites -2388
Underdogs -703
Total -3091
Knicks laying 100 to win 275
Knicks -100
YTD:
Favorites -2388
Underdogs -803
Total -3191
Timberwolves laying 100 to win 250
76ers laying 100 to win 220
Bucks laying 100 to win 310
Bulls laying 100 to win 140
Timberwolves -100
76ers -100
Bucks -100
Bulls 140
YTD:
Favorites -2388
Underdogs -963
Total -3351
Lakers laying 100 to win 525
Clippers laying 100 to win 310
Lakers -100
Clippers -100
YTD:
Favorites -2388
Underdogs -1163
Total -3551
Magic laying 100 to win 180
Timberwolves laying 100 to win 160
Bulls laying 100 to win 240
Lakers laying 100 to win 535
Bucks laying 100 to win 135
Mavericks laying 100 to win 180
Magic +180
Timberwolves -100
Bulls -100
Lakers -100
Bucks -100
Mavericks +180
YTD:
Favorites -2388
Underdogs -1203
Total -3591
Pistons laying 100 to win 160
Pelicans laying 100 to win 275
Quote: steeldcoToday's Picks:
Pistons laying 100 to win 160
Pelicans laying 100 to win 275
You picked the wrong night to stop betting against Golden State.
Kings get the outright win as a 15 point dog
Yesterday's Results: -200
Pistons -100
Pelicans -100
YTD:
Favorites -2388
Underdogs -1403
Total -3791
Raptors laying -300 to win 100
Clippers laying 100 to win 170
Trailblazers laying 100 to win 165
Raptors +100
Clippers -100
Trailblazers -100
YTD:
Favorites -2288
Underdogs -1603
Total -3891
Lakers laying 100 to win 170
Pacers laying -165 to win 100
Suns laying 100 to win 190
Mavericks laying 100 to win 135
Lakers +170
Pacers +100
Suns -100
Mavericks -100
YTD:
Favorites -2188
Underdogs -1633
Total -3821
Best of luck.
Pacers laying 100 to win 135
Heat laying 100 to win 135
Suns laying 100 to win 350
Timberwolves laying 100 to win 140
Bulls laying 100 to win 950
Kings laying 100 to win 320
Pacers -100
Heat +135
Suns -100
Timberwolves +140
Bulls -100
Kings +320
YTD:
Favorites -2188
Underdogs -1338
Total -3526
Hornets laying 100 to win 155
Mavericks laying 100 to win 150
I see where dogs of +101 to +129 have generated net losses of -601. I found this earlier on (01/25/17) and I had the algorithms eliminate those since then. BTW, they were 16 and 6. Additionally, I find that dogs getting +801 or more are winless having cost another -1,100. These will be eliminated going forward. The net impact of these 2 changes should be to leave the Dogs getting picked as a net winner of around +400. There have been a total of 228 picks of dogs so far with only 62 winning. The above 2 changes will have reduced the picks by 33.
We'll see if the plan works............
The Dogs getting in excess of +801? I put them in the class of being so bad that they should be taken out and shot.
The Dogs getting between +101 and +129? A somewhat arbitrary range that would consist of the ordinary Joe who is too scared to pick a larger dog, reasoning that they can't possibly win.
Glad to see someone actually posting their bets, win or lose, and keep a running win/loss total. Hopefully baseball season will be good to you again like it was last year (IIRC). I know you don't get many other posts here, but I and others enjoy following/reading along.
Quote: RSI'm sure it's a bit of work if you don't already have the data saved for this, but have you considered calculating your expected loss (to the HE) over the course of these bets made?
Hey RS, I'm sorry to say that I'm not sure that I understand your question. Would you mind restating so that this thick headed old guy better understands?
Every bet has a HE or vig (at least, in theory). If both sides of a bet are -110, then the vig is 10/220 or 4.54545%. Every time someone makes this wager, he expects to lose $4.45, assuming he's betting randomly and doesn't "have information" (ie: handicapping or something like that).
My question ultimately I guess, is, How do your results compare to those of what a random or "ploppy" bettor would be doing? Are they in line with what the sportsbook expects to be making off of you? Are you doing worse, the same, or better than the sportsbook would expect you to be doing (if you were a random bettor)?
There have been 229 picks made of dogs and each of them was a wager of 100. Of the total, 62 were winners (27.19%). Those 62 winners returned 15,072. An average win of 243.10.
I hope this helps. Let me know if not.
Hornets -100
Mavericks +150
YTD:
Favorites -2188
Underdogs -1288
Total -3476
Nets laying 100 to win 240
Pistons laying 100 to win 160
Knicks laying -145 to win 100
Bucks laying -190 to win 100
Timberwolves laying -155 to win 100
Pacers laying 100 to win 175
Grizzlies laying 100 to win 285
Nets -100
Pistons -100
Knicks -145
Bucks -190
Timberwolves -155
Pacers -100
Grizzlies -100
YTD:
Favorites -2678
Underdogs -1688
Total -4366
Clippers laying 100 to win 130
Cavaliers laying -800 to win 100
Thunder laying 100 to win 260
Magic laying 100 to win 220
Celtics laying 100 to win 235
Clippers +130
Cavaliers +100
Thunder -100
Magic -100
Celtics +235
YTD:
Favorites -2578
Underdogs -1523
Total -4101
Knicks laying 100 to win 300
Pistons laying 100 to win 235
Pelicans laying 100 to win 145
Knicks +300
Pistons +235
Pelicans -100
YTD:
Favorites -2578
Underdogs -1088
Total -3666
Quote: bazooookaSteel, are you looking at implied lines and then betting dogs where you think the spread is off? I'd think you'd need to have a correlation with the actual results of all your dog picks being closer to your implied lines vs vegas closing lines? If you see that then long term your strategy should win. For example you may only hit 30% of your underdog picks but if you see that on average the picks resulted in closer games then Vegas predicted then its more likely you are onto a real edge which will eventual show up in your bankroll. However if you go back through them and the Vegas spread was closer to reality than your model than the model is likely only fluctuating randomly and ultimately the long term draw-down will get you I'd suspect.
Thanks bazooooka. I appreciate the commentary and help.