Quote: bahdbwoy$$$ who lost?
Glad I couldn't find the prop on Bovada
LOL
Quote: aluisioI had it as the first scoring play of the game... 151:1 for $10
LOL
Really ?????
Actually didnt think it would happen
Quote: bahdbwoywould you rather lose like that or have it happen later in the course of the game?
get it over with in a hurry
Quote: SOOPOOPerhaps the center had a few hundred thousand on 'yes, safety' ?
Not a bad way for a center to make some retirement money
Quote: aceofspadesNot a bad way for a center to make some retirement money
As long as you have honest beards, yes.
Quote: aluisioI had it as the first scoring play of the game... 151:1 for $10
LOL
Nice job!
Sorry Wiz. :(
Woo hoo!
(Sorry Mike...)
I would take a pic of that ticket and post it up for all to enjoy...or scrren shot.Quote: aluisioYeap!! $$$
Actually didnt think it would happen
Quote: AZDuffmanGlad I couldn't find the prop on Bovada
It was there for -1000. I lost on it. But only a little.
Quote: Yo11NORAD is tracking a body over Las Vegas Nevada, falling directly from the International Space Station. It is emitting a signal in Morse code: "It was a good bet at -760...!"
Sometimes the correct play does lose. It is the nature of the game and the beauty or ugliness of variance. If you can't take it, you can't be a gambler.
Quote: darthvaderSometimes the correct play does lose. It is the nature of the game and the beauty or ugliness of variance. If you can't take it, you can't be a gambler.
Correct, even with the right bet dinner could be chicken or feathers.
It is called gambling, you know .
Quote: bahdbwoy$$$ who lost?
so how many years in a row has there been a safety in the superbowl?
Quote: bahdbwoy$$$ who lost?
so how many years in a row has there been a safety in the superbowl?
Quote: 100xOddsso how many years in a row has there been a safety in the superbowl?
3
2 years ago Brady int grounding in end zone.
last year was an intentional safety by the punter.
Quote: sabreI'm betting 5k on no safety next year ...
That's what many of us said/thought this year.....
Quote: BuzzardSee you next year !
Next year? The scouting combine is in less than three weeks. Who's offering an over/under on the most bench press reps (225 pounds)?
Quote: IbeatyouracesOh well, all of the hoopla is over. Back to the self initiated hiatus. Have fun all.
On to Sochi
+1Quote: SOOPOOPerhaps the center had a few hundred thousand on 'yes, safety' ?
I wouldn't be surprised at all. This is the type of thing that's really soured me on sports betting.
Quote: SOOPOOPerhaps the center had a few hundred thousand on 'yes, safety' ?
Risky, if Seattle falls on it it's a TD and the center is SOL. ;-(
Quote: Beethoven9th+1
I wouldn't be surprised at all. This is the type of thing that's really soured me on sports betting.
I'd be very very surprised. Those guys piss, bleed and sweat their games. It's the biggest game of the season, and for some of their careers. I doubt a highly paid center would have put up enough to throw a safety. He'd need a perfect set of circumstances to have it happen that he can make a bad snap hat would cause a safety.
Quote: kenarmanThe Wiz will be looking for a bridge.
What can I say? Three Super Bowl safties in a row, and 4 out of the last six Super Bowls. Not to mention the two-point conversion. It was definitely an awful game for me.
Since the Laiki Bank failure in Cyprus I've been on a downhill slide. I was hoping 2014 would be my comeback year, but that safety, the whole game, was a very awful beginning for the year.
If you see me with a coin cup and cardboard sign on the bridge between the New York New York and Excalibur, please throw in some small change.
Meanwhile, I'm going to be licking my wounds for a while and not posting much. Try to behave yourselves until I'm back on my feet.
Strategically it would seem it would be better to try when unnecessary with better odds, then sneak up and tie or win the game.Quote: kewljThe two point conversion seemed very odd to me. It really made no sense at all. Trailing 36-0 you score a touchdown and go for two. as if trailing 36-8 was some how different than trailing 36-7. Yes, if you do the math, because of the safety and two field goals, Denver would have needed 5 touchdowns and a two point conversion at some point, but really, you generally don't start thinking about that until you have scored 3 or 4 of those touchdowns. It just seemed a really strange call. It didn't effect me....I didn't bet the 2 pt prop, and I am not crying "conspiracy". Just seemed a strange and stupid call.
36-7 makes it a 5 score game.
Quote: thecesspit36-8 makes it a 4TD game
36-7 makes it a 5 score game.
yes, I realize that. But it is almost never done that way. When a team is trailing by 15 and scores a TD, they always go for 1, leaving the two point conversion for the final score. That keeps it a one score game. So to go for the 2 point conversion when you are still 4 scores out is very bizarre.