Thread Rating:

ChallengedMilly
ChallengedMilly
  • Threads: 30
  • Posts: 329
Joined: Jul 25, 2021
July 18th, 2025 at 5:21:07 PM permalink
It still blows my mind that they had a semi successful thing going, that they could have continued to grow an audience with, or in the worst case scenario could have sold the channel to someone that valued her audience. They did none of that.
Dieter
Administrator
Dieter
  • Threads: 17
  • Posts: 6852
Joined: Jul 23, 2014
July 18th, 2025 at 6:05:34 PM permalink
Quote: ChallengedMilly

It still blows my mind that they had a semi successful thing going, that they could have continued to grow an audience with, or in the worst case scenario could have sold the channel to someone that valued her audience. They did none of that.
link to original post



It seems to happen often.
A creator grows a following. They change something (possibly based on "good advice"), in hopes of growing more.
The following they had loses interest, because now the creator is too similar to (other creator). The new following they hoped to attract doesn't appear, possibly because of The Algorithm not suggesting the content, because it's not getting enough engagement (monetizable ad-views).

This above all, to thine own self be true. Vive la différence.
May the cards fall in your favor.
100xOdds
100xOdds
  • Threads: 692
  • Posts: 4780
Joined: Feb 5, 2012
July 19th, 2025 at 1:48:57 AM permalink
Quote: Dieter

Quote: ChallengedMilly

It still blows my mind that they had a semi successful thing going, that they could have continued to grow an audience with, or in the worst case scenario could have sold the channel to someone that valued her audience. They did none of that.
link to original post



It seems to happen often.
A creator grows a following. They change something (possibly based on "good advice"), in hopes of growing more.
The following they had loses interest, because now the creator is too similar to (other creator). The new following they hoped to attract doesn't appear, possibly because of The Algorithm not suggesting the content, because it's not getting enough engagement (monetizable ad-views).

This above all, to thine own self be true. Vive la différence.
link to original post


Wonder why didn't vic switch back to sarah being the pretty face of their channel way back when it was apparent vic was killing the brand?

On the plus side, we now get to see Sarah's bald smile on her own channel.
Craps is paradise (Pair of dice). Lets hear it for the SpeedCount Mathletes :)
Dieter
Administrator
Dieter
  • Threads: 17
  • Posts: 6852
Joined: Jul 23, 2014
July 19th, 2025 at 4:57:54 AM permalink
Quote: 100xOdds

Quote: Dieter

Quote: ChallengedMilly

It still blows my mind that they had a semi successful thing going, that they could have continued to grow an audience with, or in the worst case scenario could have sold the channel to someone that valued her audience. They did none of that.
link to original post



It seems to happen often.
A creator grows a following. They change something (possibly based on "good advice"), in hopes of growing more.
The following they had loses interest, because now the creator is too similar to (other creator). The new following they hoped to attract doesn't appear, possibly because of The Algorithm not suggesting the content, because it's not getting enough engagement (monetizable ad-views).

This above all, to thine own self be true. Vive la différence.
link to original post


Wonder why didn't vic switch back to sarah being the pretty face of their channel way back when it was apparent vic was killing the brand?

link to original post



(Truncated.)

How do you un-ring a bell?

Presumably, the people who don't like the new style will have already unsubscribed. I do not think the lost subscribers will return, even if your channel makes some reversions.
May the cards fall in your favor.
100xOdds
100xOdds
  • Threads: 692
  • Posts: 4780
Joined: Feb 5, 2012
July 19th, 2025 at 7:53:11 AM permalink
Quote: Dieter

Quote: 100xOdds


Wonder why didn't vic switch back to sarah being the pretty face of their channel way back when it was apparent vic was killing the brand?

link to original post


How do you un-ring a bell?

Presumably, the people who don't like the new style will have already unsubscribed. I do not think the lost subscribers will return, even if your channel makes some reversions.
link to original post


ah.. didn't think about that.
thus why i'm in AP, not marketing :)

back then, How would vic get more subscribers when he realized his vic was killing the channel?
Kill the channel and start another channel with a new angle with Sarah being the face again?
Craps is paradise (Pair of dice). Lets hear it for the SpeedCount Mathletes :)
Dieter
Administrator
Dieter
  • Threads: 17
  • Posts: 6852
Joined: Jul 23, 2014
July 19th, 2025 at 1:19:45 PM permalink
Quote: 100xOdds

Quote: Dieter

Quote: 100xOdds


Wonder why didn't vic switch back to sarah being the pretty face of their channel way back when it was apparent vic was killing the brand?

link to original post


How do you un-ring a bell?

Presumably, the people who don't like the new style will have already unsubscribed. I do not think the lost subscribers will return, even if your channel makes some reversions.
link to original post


ah.. didn't think about that.
thus why i'm in AP, not marketing :)

back then, How would vic get more subscribers when he realized his vic was killing the channel?
Kill the channel and start another channel with a new angle with Sarah being the face again?
link to original post



There is a difference between "I do not enjoy these changes" and "These changes will likely appeal to a more mainstream audience".

They are not incompatible.
Still, with my taste in entertainment, I know better than to use my preferences as a litmus test for what will be broadly popular.
May the cards fall in your favor.
Hunterhill
Hunterhill
  • Threads: 54
  • Posts: 2251
Joined: Aug 1, 2011
July 20th, 2025 at 10:00:24 AM permalink
Quote: avianrandy

Hmm ok thanks. I wonder if dark oz has been there? Still curious about the 2x,3x,4x bet circles on the blackjack table.
link to original post


The 2x,3x,4x bet circles are the way they get around the max bet of $50.
You can back bet yourself so technically you can play 4 bets of $50 but all the bets are for the same hand.
The limits in NH are supposed to be raised to $500 if they haven’t already been.Right now all the slots are HHR machines but that is going to be changed also.
Happy days are here again
avianrandy
avianrandy
  • Threads: 8
  • Posts: 2278
Joined: Mar 7, 2010
July 20th, 2025 at 1:22:45 PM permalink
Thanks that makes. I have never been to new Hampshire so didn't know they had those restrictions . Didn't recall seeing min max sign like most tables I have seen
She bought in for $500 so just figured it was her comfort level. She did have rebiy a couple times
avianrandy
avianrandy
  • Threads: 8
  • Posts: 2278
Joined: Mar 7, 2010
August 3rd, 2025 at 7:07:29 PM permalink
Watched about 5 minutes of a 25 minute all casino action video yesterday. Just Victor talking no Sarah. She was cat sitting he said. About every 5th word was ummm. 5 minutes was all I could take. Said he had a really bad week and needed to take a break.
  • Jump to: