Quote: ChallengedMillyIt still blows my mind that they had a semi successful thing going, that they could have continued to grow an audience with, or in the worst case scenario could have sold the channel to someone that valued her audience. They did none of that.
link to original post
It seems to happen often.
A creator grows a following. They change something (possibly based on "good advice"), in hopes of growing more.
The following they had loses interest, because now the creator is too similar to (other creator). The new following they hoped to attract doesn't appear, possibly because of The Algorithm not suggesting the content, because it's not getting enough engagement (monetizable ad-views).
This above all, to thine own self be true. Vive la différence.
Quote: DieterQuote: ChallengedMillyIt still blows my mind that they had a semi successful thing going, that they could have continued to grow an audience with, or in the worst case scenario could have sold the channel to someone that valued her audience. They did none of that.
link to original post
It seems to happen often.
A creator grows a following. They change something (possibly based on "good advice"), in hopes of growing more.
The following they had loses interest, because now the creator is too similar to (other creator). The new following they hoped to attract doesn't appear, possibly because of The Algorithm not suggesting the content, because it's not getting enough engagement (monetizable ad-views).
This above all, to thine own self be true. Vive la différence.
link to original post
Wonder why didn't vic switch back to sarah being the pretty face of their channel way back when it was apparent vic was killing the brand?
On the plus side, we now get to see Sarah's bald smile on her own channel.
Quote: 100xOddsQuote: DieterQuote: ChallengedMillyIt still blows my mind that they had a semi successful thing going, that they could have continued to grow an audience with, or in the worst case scenario could have sold the channel to someone that valued her audience. They did none of that.
link to original post
It seems to happen often.
A creator grows a following. They change something (possibly based on "good advice"), in hopes of growing more.
The following they had loses interest, because now the creator is too similar to (other creator). The new following they hoped to attract doesn't appear, possibly because of The Algorithm not suggesting the content, because it's not getting enough engagement (monetizable ad-views).
This above all, to thine own self be true. Vive la différence.
link to original post
Wonder why didn't vic switch back to sarah being the pretty face of their channel way back when it was apparent vic was killing the brand?
link to original post
(Truncated.)
How do you un-ring a bell?
Presumably, the people who don't like the new style will have already unsubscribed. I do not think the lost subscribers will return, even if your channel makes some reversions.
Quote: DieterQuote: 100xOdds
Wonder why didn't vic switch back to sarah being the pretty face of their channel way back when it was apparent vic was killing the brand?
link to original post
How do you un-ring a bell?
Presumably, the people who don't like the new style will have already unsubscribed. I do not think the lost subscribers will return, even if your channel makes some reversions.
link to original post
ah.. didn't think about that.
thus why i'm in AP, not marketing :)
back then, How would vic get more subscribers when he realized his vic was killing the channel?
Kill the channel and start another channel with a new angle with Sarah being the face again?
Quote: 100xOddsQuote: DieterQuote: 100xOdds
Wonder why didn't vic switch back to sarah being the pretty face of their channel way back when it was apparent vic was killing the brand?
link to original post
How do you un-ring a bell?
Presumably, the people who don't like the new style will have already unsubscribed. I do not think the lost subscribers will return, even if your channel makes some reversions.
link to original post
ah.. didn't think about that.
thus why i'm in AP, not marketing :)
back then, How would vic get more subscribers when he realized his vic was killing the channel?
Kill the channel and start another channel with a new angle with Sarah being the face again?
link to original post
There is a difference between "I do not enjoy these changes" and "These changes will likely appeal to a more mainstream audience".
They are not incompatible.
Still, with my taste in entertainment, I know better than to use my preferences as a litmus test for what will be broadly popular.
Quote: avianrandyHmm ok thanks. I wonder if dark oz has been there? Still curious about the 2x,3x,4x bet circles on the blackjack table.
link to original post
The 2x,3x,4x bet circles are the way they get around the max bet of $50.
You can back bet yourself so technically you can play 4 bets of $50 but all the bets are for the same hand.
The limits in NH are supposed to be raised to $500 if they haven’t already been.Right now all the slots are HHR machines but that is going to be changed also.
She bought in for $500 so just figured it was her comfort level. She did have rebiy a couple times
Quote: 100xOddsQuote: DieterQuote: ChallengedMillyIt still blows my mind that they had a semi successful thing going, that they could have continued to grow an audience with, or in the worst case scenario could have sold the channel to someone that valued her audience. They did none of that.
link to original post
It seems to happen often.
A creator grows a following. They change something (possibly based on "good advice"), in hopes of growing more.
The following they had loses interest, because now the creator is too similar to (other creator). The new following they hoped to attract doesn't appear, possibly because of The Algorithm not suggesting the content, because it's not getting enough engagement (monetizable ad-views).
This above all, to thine own self be true. Vive la différence.
link to original post
Wonder why didn't vic switch back to sarah being the pretty face of their channel way back when it was apparent vic was killing the brand?
###########################################################################################################
According to EZ Slots and other critics, Sara said she was being "Stalked" and harassed by Simps who would either track her down from El Cortez or just straight love bomb her constantly in the live streams, comments section and on Instagram.
It's her own fault for not just outright saying she and Victor were A couple and always keeping that detail ambiguous or just avoiding the topic altogether prior to the Only fans "debut". They intentionally did this to create "hope" in the minds of those same stalkers so they would keep donating money and paying for subscriptions on YT. Little did they know they could go a wHOLE different kind of subscription for her!
On the plus side, we now get to see Sarah's bald smile on her own channel.
link to original post
sites with Pics of her vertical smile were a couple of yrs old
Quote: 100xOddsShe still doing OF?
sites with Pics of her vertical smile were a couple of yrs old
link to original post
Either that or back to escorting, rent's gotta be paid somehow and Vic sure ain't winning it at the Casino!

