Thread Rating:
see if you can't deal not one top 5 card combo. Any 2 cards between 10 - ace.
If you always get at least 1 combo of any cards between 10 - Ace .
Online poker maybe fake, anything thats fake can be rigged.
I have done the pocket challenge over , and over .(hours est.40 done in a few months ) Avg. 3 any of top 5 combo. Enough times to write this as my word. I can't remember 1 time in 26 str8 pairs.( thats the number of pairs in a deck before I needed to resuffle the deck). I didn't get 1 t5 combo
And this should be a poker principal. Remember a online site dealt me 52 pocket cards in a row WITHOUT one top combo. And more than once......
This a like cause anyone can do this. And any reader can PUT A WRITERS trust worthness to the test.
Like I'm now.. so ALL YOU NAY SAYERS. Post your results to the world. Please don't do the test, and then REFUSE
to post your findings. Cause if I'm right about this then.......?
And sorry again for the typing.
Also I have the hand history to prove my claim about the 52 str8 pockets
without a t5 combo.
Quote: AussieCan someone get rid if this guy already?
I strongly concur.
Quote: AussieCan someone get rid if this guy already?
Nothing? you dont own a deck of playing cards? Or your a person who needs to bash things you dont
understand? Needing another person to tell you it's okay to agree with something different. Need I higher
figure to tell you whats right, and what to disagree with. And only back popular thoughts. Dude take
off the blinders ..The world is around.
Please do the challenge. thanks
Quote: 40487Nothing? you dont own a deck of playing cards? Or your a person who needs to bash things you dont
understand? Needing another person to tell you it's okay to agree with something different. Need I higher
figure to tell you whats right, and what to disagree with. And only back popular thoughts. Dude take
off the blinders ..The world is around.
Please do the challenge. thanks
As I said in the other thread, I'll repeat for a final time. Your experiment is flawed. The casino doesn't deal you 2 pocket cards and then save the rest of the deck for your next pocket cards. Your next pocket cards are from a fresh 52 card deck. You have to shuffle the deck after each deal for the experiment to be accurate.
have a nice day.
...Quote: dwheatleyI did it once and DIDN'T get a top pair. I'm now convinced online poker is safe for all.
have a nice day.
ladies, and gents your first lair...hey stupid everyone can take this test , and know your a lair..
Quote: cclub79As I said in the other thread, I'll repeat for a final time. Your experiment is flawed. The casino doesn't deal you 2 pocket cards and then save the rest of the deck for your next pocket cards. Your next pocket cards are from a fresh 52 card deck. You have to shuffle the deck after each deal for the experiment to be accurate.
and I repeat you don't...but to prove you wrong..earlier I did re shuffle the deck each time. and
and post the finding on here somewhere. And close I got was to 52 . was 21 times before t5 combo.
and had 1 9 6 4 7 3 11 8 2 15 times before getting a t5. nowhere close to 52.
I believe that will be the case. In fact I believe you'll have far more than one. Although it IS possible to have zero.
But if you deal one two card hand and shuffle them back in and repeat it 26 times, while it would be unlikely, it would be entirely possible to have none of those 26 have high hands. And such a scenario is more probable than the first scenario.
HOWEVER, I absolutely believe that if you then do both of those tests a hundred times, and add up the number of hands with high cards, the first scenario will have a higher total.
Quote: 40487...ladies, and gents your first lair...hey stupid everyone can take this test , and know your a lair..
OK, I don't think I need to even try it for myself. You have absolutely convinced me that he is actually a wild animal's resting place.
pocket cards | occurances |
---|---|
1 | 1433 |
2 | 1228 |
3 | 1052 |
4 | 901 |
5 | 772 |
6 | 661 |
7 | 567 |
8 | 485 |
9 | 416 |
10 | 356 |
11 | 305 |
12 | 261 |
13 | 224 |
14 | 192 |
15 | 164 |
16 | 141 |
17 | 121 |
18 | 103 |
19 | 89 |
20 | 76 |
21 | 65 |
22 | 56 |
23 | 48 |
24 | 41 |
25 | 35 |
26 | 30 |
27 | 26 |
28 | 22 |
29 | 19 |
30 | 16 |
31 | 14 |
32 | 12 |
33 | 10 |
34 | 9 |
35 | 7 |
36 | 6 |
37 | 5 |
38 | 5 |
39 | 4 |
40 | 3 |
41 | 3 |
42 | 3 |
43 | 2 |
44 | 2 |
45 | 2 |
46 | 1 |
47 | 1 |
48 | 1 |
49 | 1 |
50 | 1 |
51 | 1 |
52 | 1 |
thanks for doing it, and to post your results.
3.2 out of 10,000 is not out of the realm of possibility. It's just being unlucky.
What bothers me is the fact that you believe that the casino has singled you out. Why? Why hasn't it singled everyone else out?
A far more likely scenario for cheating is indeed someone else knowing what your cards are and betting accordingly against you. The only money that the casino is going to take off of you with crappy cards should be the blinds, a slow death.