SkittleCar1
SkittleCar1
  • Threads: 14
  • Posts: 253
Joined: Feb 7, 2014
February 26th, 2014 at 12:39:08 PM permalink
After doing some research to find a new game to play, I came across Three Card Poker, and it seems easy enough.
Something doesn't jive with me though, and I think it might be just my casino.
The 3-Card Poker table has a $5 minimum bet, and requires you make at minimum, an EQUAL bet on the Pair Plus.
So now I would have $10 down.
Say I draw an unsuited Q-6-4.
So, I put down my $5 play wager.
Dealer has an unsuited 2-4-6. Which does not qualify.
I lose my $5 on the pair plus.
My $5 play wager pushes.
I win $5 on my ante.
After all that, I didn't win a single dime.
Now, if I would have folded, I lose $10.

Is it just me, or is this game a complete sucker game??
AxiomOfChoice
AxiomOfChoice
  • Threads: 32
  • Posts: 5761
Joined: Sep 12, 2012
February 26th, 2014 at 12:43:00 PM permalink
Quote: SkittleCar1

After doing some research to find a new game to play, I came across Three Card Poker, and it seems easy enough.
Something doesn't jive with me though, and I think it might be just my casino.
The 3-Card Poker table has a $5 minimum bet, and requires you make at minimum, an EQUAL bet on the Pair Plus.
So now I would have $10 down.
Say I draw an unsuited Q-6-4.
So, I put down my $5 play wager.
Dealer has an unsuited 2-4-6. Which does not qualify.
I lose my $5 on the pair plus.
My $5 play wager pushes.
I win $5 on my ante.
After all that, I didn't win a single dime.
Now, if I would have folded, I lose $10.

Is it just me, or is this game a complete sucker game??



Not only is it a sucker game, but they are forcing you to make a sucker side bet (I've never heard of the Pair Plus being required before).

It's a really, really boring game anyway. You get your cards. If they are higher than some threshold, you make a play bet. If it's lower, you fold. There is no thinking at all involved. You may as well play casino war. I played once, and it held my interest for about 2 minutes.

It's really popular, though. I have no idea why.
geoff
geoff
  • Threads: 3
  • Posts: 368
Joined: Feb 19, 2014
February 26th, 2014 at 12:46:17 PM permalink
It depends on the exact pay schedule they have. The WoO has a pair plus + ante bet giving a 5.32% HE for the most common game which is slightly worse than 00 roulette (5.26%). If it has one of the better paytables the odds can get down to around craps passline edge.
Zcore13
Zcore13
  • Threads: 41
  • Posts: 3838
Joined: Nov 30, 2009
February 26th, 2014 at 12:49:21 PM permalink
At my Casino if you play $5 on the Ante you can optionally choose to play the pair plus starting at $1. The table minimum just has to be played in one spot.

Any to answer your question if it is a sucker game... yes it is. Every game in the Casino is.


ZCore13
I am an employee of a Casino. Former Table Games Director,, current Pit Supervisor. All the personal opinions I post are my own and do not represent the opinions of the Casino or Tribe that I work for.
SkittleCar1
SkittleCar1
  • Threads: 14
  • Posts: 253
Joined: Feb 7, 2014
February 26th, 2014 at 12:56:05 PM permalink
Quote: Zcore13



And to answer your question if it is a sucker game... yes it is. Every game in the Casino is.


ZCore13



Haha! Very true! Even the ATM has a house advantage. :-P
Ibeatyouraces
Ibeatyouraces
  • Threads: 68
  • Posts: 11933
Joined: Jan 12, 2010
February 26th, 2014 at 1:02:21 PM permalink
deleted
DUHHIIIIIIIII HEARD THAT!
sodawater
sodawater
  • Threads: 64
  • Posts: 3321
Joined: May 14, 2012
February 26th, 2014 at 1:14:07 PM permalink
i have never, ever, ever, heard of a casino requiring an EQUAL bet on the PP. That's just a stupid policy. Are you sure you're not confusing the policy? I do know of several casinos that say your PP bet cannot exceed your ante... which, itself, is a silly rule, but it makes a bit more sense.

Are you sure you don't have it reversed? Your PP bet can be anything from the table minimum up to what you bet on the ante.
SkittleCar1
SkittleCar1
  • Threads: 14
  • Posts: 253
Joined: Feb 7, 2014
February 26th, 2014 at 1:21:48 PM permalink
From the website.....

Playing the Game
You must play both the “Ante” and “Pair Plus” wagers. The “Ante” wager lets you play against the dealer’s hand. The “Pair Plus” wager lets you bet against your own hand. With “Pair Plus,” if your hand contains a pair or better you win regardless of the dealer’s hand!

Once all bets are placed, each player and the dealer are each dealt three cards, face down. After examining the cards, you may place a “Play” wager equal to the “Ante” amount to contine play or you may fold, losing your “Ante” and “Pair Plus” wagers.

When all bets or folds are complete, the dealer will show and arrange cards from highest to lowest, playing only with a Queen high card or better.

Pays
You win even money on the “Play” wager and at least even money on the “Ante” wager when your three-card hand beats the dealer’s qualifying hand of Queen-high or better. You lose the “Play” wagers when the dealer’s qualifying hand beats your hand. All ties are a “push.” If the dealer does not qualify, your “Ante” wins even money or better* and your “Play” wager receives no action. Your “Pair Plus” wager pays even money or better if you have a pair or better regardless of the dealers hand.

ANTE PAYS
Player folds:
Lose
Dealer does NOT Play:
“Play” is a Push
“Ante” pays 1 to 1 or better *
Dealer Plays, Player’s hand wins:
“Play” pays special pays
"Ante” pays 1 to 1 or better *
Dealer plays, Dealer’s hand wins:
“Play” is a loss
“Ante” may be a loss *

PAIRS PLUS PAYS
Pair – 1 to 1
Straight – 1 to 1
Flush – 4 to 1
Straight – 6 to 1
Three of a Kind – 30 to 1
Straight Flush – 40 to 1

* ANTE BONUS PAYS
Straight – 1 to 1
Three of a Kind – 4 to 1
Straight Flush – 5 to 1

* If you make the “Ante” and “Play” wagers, you may win the “Ante bonus” payout even if the dealer doesn’t qualify and even if the dealer’s hand beats your hand!
1arrowheaddr
1arrowheaddr
  • Threads: 14
  • Posts: 297
Joined: Jun 20, 2012
February 26th, 2014 at 1:22:23 PM permalink
Harrah's have been known to make people bet the Pair Plus if they want to play the 6-Card Bonus.
SkittleCar1
SkittleCar1
  • Threads: 14
  • Posts: 253
Joined: Feb 7, 2014
February 26th, 2014 at 1:23:52 PM permalink
And I'm pretty sure the felt on the table said it required equal bets.
BleedingChipsSlowly
BleedingChipsSlowly
  • Threads: 23
  • Posts: 1033
Joined: Jul 9, 2010
February 26th, 2014 at 1:31:19 PM permalink
The few times I played at Mohegan Sun I was not required to put up a PairPlus wager. However, I did have to get the pit boss involved to convince the dealer I could do that. The 3.37% HE on ante & play puts the game in common slot machine territory for sucker bets. The 7.28% HE on PairPlus makes roulette look good.
“You don’t bring a bone saw to a negotiation.” - Robert Jordan, former U.S. ambassador to Saudi Arabia
beachbumbabs
beachbumbabs
  • Threads: 101
  • Posts: 14268
Joined: May 21, 2013
February 26th, 2014 at 1:53:33 PM permalink
IMHO, that requirement would be entirely on the casino (you don't say which one) because it's simply not that way in the vast majority of places dealing the game. Early on, they were requiring an ante bet in order to play the PP sidebet, but even that has changed in most places, and a person can bet one without the other. However, many places that allow the PP bet alone do not allow the bettor to peek or even touch their cards, because there's no further decision to be made.

Anyway, that requirement would change the HE of the base game considerably. I personally wouldn't care, because if I'm playing 3CP, I'm playing PP. note: that is a better PP paytable than most everyone else offers, fwiw. 1-4-6 there, 1-3-6 most other places.
If the House lost every hand, they wouldn't deal the game.
AxiomOfChoice
AxiomOfChoice
  • Threads: 32
  • Posts: 5761
Joined: Sep 12, 2012
February 26th, 2014 at 1:55:13 PM permalink
Quote: beachbumbabs

IMHO, that requirement would be entirely on the casino (you don't say which one) because it's simply not that way in the vast majority of places dealing the game. Early on, they were requiring an ante bet in order to play the PP sidebet, but even that has changed in most places, and a person can bet one without the other. However, many places that allow the PP bet alone do not allow the bettor to peek or even touch their cards, because there's no further decision to be made.

Anyway, that requirement would change the HE of the base game considerably. I personally wouldn't care, because if I'm playing 3CP, I'm playing PP. note: that is a better PP paytable than most everyone else offers, fwiw. 1-4-6 there, 1-3-6 most other places.



The only reasons that I could think of them having this requirement would be:

1. They are confused and don't understand the rules of the game
2. They are worried about hole-carders (this will get rid of them for sure)
SkittleCar1
SkittleCar1
  • Threads: 14
  • Posts: 253
Joined: Feb 7, 2014
February 26th, 2014 at 2:05:43 PM permalink
I purposely didn't name the casino, (I like the place, don't want to bash them.) but you can find out pretty easily if you really wanted to. :-)
movieguy73
movieguy73
  • Threads: 5
  • Posts: 34
Joined: Jun 16, 2012
March 4th, 2014 at 5:55:10 PM permalink
Quote: SkittleCar1

After doing some research to find a new game to play, I came across Three Card Poker, and it seems easy enough.
Something doesn't jive with me though, and I think it might be just my casino.
The 3-Card Poker table has a $5 minimum bet, and requires you make at minimum, an EQUAL bet on the Pair Plus.
So now I would have $10 down.
Say I draw an unsuited Q-6-4.
So, I put down my $5 play wager.
Dealer has an unsuited 2-4-6. Which does not qualify.
I lose my $5 on the pair plus.
My $5 play wager pushes.
I win $5 on my ante.
After all that, I didn't win a single dime.
Now, if I would have folded, I lose $10.

Is it just me, or is this game a complete sucker game??




maybe the table min was $10. so you needed to play 5x2 or 10 to meet the min.
if you dont see the sucker at the table its you!!!
SkittleCar1
SkittleCar1
  • Threads: 14
  • Posts: 253
Joined: Feb 7, 2014
March 4th, 2014 at 5:59:40 PM permalink
I checked at the table, it's a minimum of $5 on the ante & pair plus.
Mosca
Mosca
  • Threads: 191
  • Posts: 4141
Joined: Dec 14, 2009
March 4th, 2014 at 6:06:15 PM permalink
Quote: SkittleCar1

From the website.....

Playing the Game
You must play both the “Ante” and “Pair Plus” wagers. The “Ante” wager lets you play against the dealer’s hand. The “Pair Plus” wager lets you bet against your own hand. With “Pair Plus,” if your hand contains a pair or better you win regardless of the dealer’s hand!

Once all bets are placed, each player and the dealer are each dealt three cards, face down. After examining the cards, you may place a “Play” wager equal to the “Ante” amount to contine play or you may fold, losing your “Ante” and “Pair Plus” wagers.

When all bets or folds are complete, the dealer will show and arrange cards from highest to lowest, playing only with a Queen high card or better.

Pays
You win even money on the “Play” wager and at least even money on the “Ante” wager when your three-card hand beats the dealer’s qualifying hand of Queen-high or better. You lose the “Play” wagers when the dealer’s qualifying hand beats your hand. All ties are a “push.” If the dealer does not qualify, your “Ante” wins even money or better* and your “Play” wager receives no action. Your “Pair Plus” wager pays even money or better if you have a pair or better regardless of the dealers hand.

ANTE PAYS
Player folds:
Lose
Dealer does NOT Play:
“Play” is a Push
“Ante” pays 1 to 1 or better *
Dealer Plays, Player’s hand wins:
“Play” pays special pays
"Ante” pays 1 to 1 or better *
Dealer plays, Dealer’s hand wins:
“Play” is a loss
“Ante” may be a loss *

PAIRS PLUS PAYS
Pair – 1 to 1
Straight – 1 to 1
Flush – 4 to 1
Straight – 6 to 1
Three of a Kind – 30 to 1
Straight Flush – 40 to 1

* ANTE BONUS PAYS
Straight – 1 to 1
Three of a Kind – 4 to 1
Straight Flush – 5 to 1

* If you make the “Ante” and “Play” wagers, you may win the “Ante bonus” payout even if the dealer doesn’t qualify and even if the dealer’s hand beats your hand!



That's a good pairs-plus pay table. House edge is 2.32%. The element of risk on the ante/raise is 2.01%.

If you hit a few nice hands your bankroll can grow very quickly. By the same token, you can lose it all without hitting a winner. Big swings in this game.
A falling knife has no handle.
Tomspur
Tomspur
  • Threads: 28
  • Posts: 2019
Joined: Jul 12, 2013
March 4th, 2014 at 7:27:26 PM permalink
I installed the game on 4 cruise ships and 2 land based casinos. In my opinion Axiom is right, they either don't get it or they are trying to prevent AP's from getting at the game.

The rules are (that I was aware of way back when) is that you have to match your ante bet with the play, no more no less. The PP bet is an elective.
Some casinos did make the ruling though, that IF you decided to bet the PP, you had to make the wager the same size as that of the Ante (and obviously play bets).

If the information is accurate it is strange indeed.
“There is something about the outside of a horse that is good for the inside of a man.” - Winston Churchill
SkittleCar1
SkittleCar1
  • Threads: 14
  • Posts: 253
Joined: Feb 7, 2014
March 9th, 2014 at 1:53:15 PM permalink
I just did an experiment, and it took about 40 minutes.

I gave four "players" $50 each, and played them with the required minimum $5 ante and $5 pair plus bet. Every "player" played a Q-6-4 or above. I shuffled as many possible ways as I could to make it truly random.

One player went out fairly quick.
At that point, two players were up probably $20 or $30. The third guy was down $10 or so.
All three played for quite a bit, not sure how many hands. But the next "player" to go out, was one of the ones who was up after the first guy was out.
So, nothing really that abnormal. I was surprised how long the other three lasted before all their chips were gone.

Now, when the second player went out, in a matter of a few hands, the two remaining players went out quick!

I am going to set up and run this experiment again. But does it really matter how many players are playing? Like having a better mixture of cards? I wouldn't think so? The cards are random.
tringlomane
tringlomane
  • Threads: 8
  • Posts: 6284
Joined: Aug 25, 2012
March 9th, 2014 at 2:21:17 PM permalink
Quote: SkittleCar1

I just did an experiment, and it took about 40 minutes.

I gave four "players" $50 each, and played them with the required minimum $5 ante and $5 pair plus bet. Every "player" played a Q-6-4 or above. I shuffled as many possible ways as I could to make it truly random.

One player went out fairly quick.
At that point, two players were up probably $20 or $30. The third guy was down $10 or so.
All three played for quite a bit, not sure how many hands. But the next "player" to go out, was one of the ones who was up after the first guy was out.
So, nothing really that abnormal. I was surprised how long the other three lasted before all their chips were gone.

Now, when the second player went out, in a matter of a few hands, the two remaining players went out quick!

I am going to set up and run this experiment again. But does it really matter how many players are playing? Like having a better mixture of cards? I wouldn't think so? The cards are random.



Yes, the more players that are playing the longer on average the experiment will last. The more players there are, there are more chances for one of them to experience strong positive variance, which will make them survive longer.
SkittleCar1
SkittleCar1
  • Threads: 14
  • Posts: 253
Joined: Feb 7, 2014
March 9th, 2014 at 2:49:25 PM permalink
Interesting. So you may have a better chance with more players at the table? Or at least a chance at not blowing through $50 so quickly.

BTW, experiment #2 had similar results, except final player was up $40 ($90 in stack) and it took quite a while to knock him down to $50. If I were that fictitious player in real life, I would have walked.

I guess on my next trip, I might give this game a shot despite the requirement for an even ante & pair plus bet.
AxiomOfChoice
AxiomOfChoice
  • Threads: 32
  • Posts: 5761
Joined: Sep 12, 2012
March 9th, 2014 at 3:05:13 PM permalink
Quote: SkittleCar1

Interesting. So you may have a better chance with more players at the table?



No. There is a better chance that someone will last a long time. There are also more people to choose from, so your chances remain the same.
SkittleCar1
SkittleCar1
  • Threads: 14
  • Posts: 253
Joined: Feb 7, 2014
March 9th, 2014 at 3:09:08 PM permalink
I guess that is what I meant.

There is nothing worse than blowing through a bunch of money in a few minutes. I'd much rather blow through it in a couple of hours! :-)
djatc
djatc
  • Threads: 83
  • Posts: 4477
Joined: Jan 15, 2013
March 9th, 2014 at 3:16:17 PM permalink
I don't even know why casinos try to screw the players out of this game. I've seen so many people play 3 card poker and raise every hand, when they know they can fold. This lady ran through 3 or 4 hundred playing $25 on the pair(s) plus and $50 or so on the blind and ante. She would play 6 high when she could have easily folded and saved half her money. She didn't have any alcoholic drinks so I just assumed she was blind or had bad eyesight.

I would help her out but people get very mad when you try to help them.
"Man Babes" #AxelFabulous
AxiomOfChoice
AxiomOfChoice
  • Threads: 32
  • Posts: 5761
Joined: Sep 12, 2012
March 9th, 2014 at 3:29:36 PM permalink
Quote: SkittleCar1

I guess that is what I meant.

There is nothing worse than blowing through a bunch of money in a few minutes. I'd much rather blow through it in a couple of hours! :-)



There is the same chance that you will blow through a bunch of money in a few minutes. You have no extra chance of lasting a long time.

Suppose there is a 1/3 chance that any player lasts "a long time". If there are 7 players at the table, there is a good chance that 1, 2, or 3 of the players will last "a long time". But your chances are still 1 in 3, same as if you were playing alone.
geoff
geoff
  • Threads: 3
  • Posts: 368
Joined: Feb 19, 2014
March 9th, 2014 at 3:47:26 PM permalink
Well generally you'll last longer at a table full of people due to dealing cards taking longer for what it's worth.
AxiomOfChoice
AxiomOfChoice
  • Threads: 32
  • Posts: 5761
Joined: Sep 12, 2012
March 9th, 2014 at 4:10:43 PM permalink
Quote: geoff

Well generally you'll last longer at a table full of people due to dealing cards taking longer for what it's worth.



Sure. I assumed that he was counting hands, not time.

If he wants to maximize time he should take frequent bathroom breaks and find lots of other reasons to sit out hands.
SkittleCar1
SkittleCar1
  • Threads: 14
  • Posts: 253
Joined: Feb 7, 2014
March 9th, 2014 at 6:10:39 PM permalink
Time...not hands. :)
AxiomOfChoice
AxiomOfChoice
  • Threads: 32
  • Posts: 5761
Joined: Sep 12, 2012
March 9th, 2014 at 7:59:05 PM permalink
Quote: SkittleCar1

Time...not hands. :)



Oh. Then play 1 out of every 10 hands and take frequent bathroom breaks.
SkittleCar1
SkittleCar1
  • Threads: 14
  • Posts: 253
Joined: Feb 7, 2014
March 15th, 2014 at 6:23:37 PM permalink
I played it in the casino for the first time today. Started with $40. Ended up buying in another $60. And walked away with $60. I did hit one straight which pretty much saved me from losing the full $100. I thought it was fun. I was very surprised at how few hands I had to fold. I think I played for an hour and I think I may have folded 4 or 5 times. Everything else was playable. Not all winners, but a lot of what I would call pushes. (Losing Pair +, Winning Ante, pushing the Play.) More importantly, I found a new game to play. Although there is not much skill. :-)
GWAE
GWAE
  • Threads: 93
  • Posts: 9854
Joined: Sep 20, 2013
March 15th, 2014 at 6:45:14 PM permalink
Akwesasne Mohawk Casino?
Expect the worst and you will never be disappointed. I AM NOT PART OF GWAE RADIO SHOW
SkittleCar1
SkittleCar1
  • Threads: 14
  • Posts: 253
Joined: Feb 7, 2014
March 15th, 2014 at 6:54:46 PM permalink
Yes.
Love that place.
GWAE
GWAE
  • Threads: 93
  • Posts: 9854
Joined: Sep 20, 2013
March 15th, 2014 at 7:05:10 PM permalink
this sounds like a job for mission-I love making phone calls-146

Whether it is 5 and 5 or if the dealer was just an idiot.
Expect the worst and you will never be disappointed. I AM NOT PART OF GWAE RADIO SHOW
SkittleCar1
SkittleCar1
  • Threads: 14
  • Posts: 253
Joined: Feb 7, 2014
March 15th, 2014 at 7:12:31 PM permalink
Oh, the requiring both bets thing?
I had two dealers tell me you had to play the Pair Plus. I did not ask the dealer today. The table minimum is $5 for the ante, and $5 minimum on Pair Plus. They do not have to match.
SkittleCar1
SkittleCar1
  • Threads: 14
  • Posts: 253
Joined: Feb 7, 2014
March 15th, 2014 at 7:14:16 PM permalink
And I wouldn't call the dealers "idiots."
They are all very nice there.
BleedingChipsSlowly
BleedingChipsSlowly
  • Threads: 23
  • Posts: 1033
Joined: Jul 9, 2010
March 16th, 2014 at 10:45:10 AM permalink
Quote: SkittleCar1

Oh, the requiring both bets thing? I had two dealers tell me you had to play the Pair Plus...


You might get a different answer from the pit boss: I did.
“You don’t bring a bone saw to a negotiation.” - Robert Jordan, former U.S. ambassador to Saudi Arabia
SkittleCar1
SkittleCar1
  • Threads: 14
  • Posts: 253
Joined: Feb 7, 2014
March 29th, 2014 at 7:56:19 PM permalink
I played six hands tonight before someone from the floor came over and told me it was required to play the Ante & the Pair Plus. First hand after that discussion was a straight. :-P
Gotta love turning $15 into $60!

EDIT: The minimum on the table is $5 and the minimum on the Pair Plus is $5. They do not have to be equal.
SkittleCar1
SkittleCar1
  • Threads: 14
  • Posts: 253
Joined: Feb 7, 2014
April 5th, 2014 at 2:15:34 PM permalink
I will no longer complain. I have profited $350 in the last week from this game. $5 on the Ante and $5 on the Pair Plus. :-)
Hunterhill
Hunterhill
  • Threads: 54
  • Posts: 2213
Joined: Aug 1, 2011
April 5th, 2014 at 3:10:14 PM permalink
Enjoy yourself now. If you keep playing that bad game you will lose.
Happy days are here again
SkittleCar1
SkittleCar1
  • Threads: 14
  • Posts: 253
Joined: Feb 7, 2014
April 5th, 2014 at 4:19:23 PM permalink
Obviously.
We all know that.
But its fun.
And that is why we all come here.
If we all came to this website and said, "well, I'll never win, screw this place" there would be no Wizard of Vegas board.
98Clubs
98Clubs
  • Threads: 52
  • Posts: 1728
Joined: Jun 3, 2010
April 6th, 2014 at 1:46:54 AM permalink
The more I read about 3CP the less I like it. I think the person(s) that "invented" Q-Poker got it right. Just change the payouts to "Straight or better" pays 2:1. That puts the H.A. to about 1.8%. For a comparitively simple game to operate, limits could to to House max (say $2G's). Maybe even press Baccarat with an 11:5 Straights or Better payout at about 1.3%. Some whale dollars could be scraped up.

Then again I really do need that cup of coffee this time of day.
Some people need to reimagine their thinking.
odiousgambit
odiousgambit
  • Threads: 327
  • Posts: 9734
Joined: Nov 9, 2009
April 6th, 2014 at 3:46:46 AM permalink
Quote: quoted rules

With “Pair Plus,” if your hand contains a pair or better you win regardless of the dealer’s hand!



with the right paytable, the Pair Plus is tolerable. However, be on your toes for a dealer picking up your winning pair plus bet along with any losing main bet.
the next time Dame Fortune toys with your heart, your soul and your wallet, raise your glass and praise her thus: “Thanks for nothing, you cold-hearted, evil, damnable, nefarious, low-life, malicious monster from Hell!”   She is, after all, stone deaf. ... Arnold Snyder
Mosca
Mosca
  • Threads: 191
  • Posts: 4141
Joined: Dec 14, 2009
April 6th, 2014 at 4:40:36 AM permalink
Quote: odiousgambit

with the right paytable, the Pair Plus is tolerable. However, be on your toes for a dealer picking up your winning pair plus bet along with any losing main bet.



It's more common for the dealer to miss paying the extra unit on the ante on losing straights.
A falling knife has no handle.
  • Jump to: