MathExtremist
MathExtremist
  • Threads: 88
  • Posts: 6526
Joined: Aug 31, 2010
May 7th, 2015 at 10:02:12 AM permalink
For those interested in game mathematics, here's an example of a simple dice game that has a not-so-simple analysis.

http://cs.gettysburg.edu/~tneller/papers/pig.pdf
"In my own case, when it seemed to me after a long illness that death was close at hand, I found no little solace in playing constantly at dice." -- Girolamo Cardano, 1563
RS
RS
  • Threads: 62
  • Posts: 8626
Joined: Feb 11, 2014
May 7th, 2015 at 12:49:09 PM permalink
Interesting read.
studmuffn
studmuffn
  • Threads: 3
  • Posts: 50
Joined: Jan 14, 2015
May 7th, 2015 at 1:01:12 PM permalink
Wow, that got complicated in a hurry. I think the paper makes more sense if you start with the SKUNK variation, which explains how to maximize points with a limited number of turns rather than with a point goal.

To wrap my head around it, I tried to reason the optimal number of rolls if you wanted to get maximum points in a single turn. If x = # of turns, I think EV = 4*x*(5/6)^x, because 4 is the average scoring outcome, and there is a 1/6 chance you lose your total each turn (by rolling a 1). This yields the optimal strategy of stopping after 5 or 6 rolls to maximize a single round, with both EV=8.03755.

Am I on the right track here?
tringlomane
tringlomane
  • Threads: 8
  • Posts: 6281
Joined: Aug 25, 2012
May 7th, 2015 at 2:01:56 PM permalink
Interesting article, goes to show how little it takes to make a game more complex.

Still can't believe that group up in Alberta "solved" heads-up limit hold 'em.
  • Jump to: