I was under the impression non-random games is one of the most serious offenses in the eyes of the wizard.
Quote: VladPutinWinaday is blacklisted for non-random games at the Pogg. In fact, not only are they non-random, but Winaday openly and explicitly state that.
I was under the impression non-random games is one of the most serious offenses in the eyes of the wizard.
link to original post
first casino ive seen (i dont look at many i guess) that doesnt even have a "tested rng" certificate they just claim to be fair lmao
I haven't a clue if they are fair or not when its comes to the RNG stuff. However, tlhey used to have a significant + EV situation regarding their bonuses(even if it was an unfair RNG). Even after they caught me taking advantage of their bonuses, they sent me a friendly email saying , Im too skilled for them , but were paying me the remaining balance and regrettably eliminating me from their bonus program. They have since plugged the Advantage ( Not that you still can't gain one, its just not anywhere as good as it once was) As far as I am concerned , they should be on his list of approved casino's. They have good bonuses,they pay consistently and on time.Quote: heatmapQuote: VladPutinWinaday is blacklisted for non-random games at the Pogg. In fact, not only are they non-random, but Winaday openly and explicitly state that.
I was under the impression non-random games is one of the most serious offenses in the eyes of the wizard.
link to original post
first casino ive seen (i dont look at many i guess) that doesnt even have a "tested rng" certificate they just claim to be fair lmao
link to original post
Quote from the pogg's review of winaday:
"WinADay casino also run a selection of Video Poker games with progressive jackpots. They openly state within the game help files that the odds of winning the jackpot do not conform to the natural odds of hitting a Royal Flush. This means that the game designers have altered the odds of the game away from those that would naturally occur using cards, making these games slot games. This practice would never be allowed in any reputable offline jurisdiction."
I dont doubt that's the case, I have played a huge number of hands-on 50 play and I never hit a royal, however, my results were actually above expectation since I was dealt duces on DW a few times.Quote: VladPutinNo no that wasn't what I meant. Please allow me to clarify.
Quote from the pogg's review of winaday:
"WinADay casino also run a selection of Video Poker games with progressive jackpots. They openly state within the game help files that the odds of winning the jackpot do not conform to the natural odds of hitting a Royal Flush. This means that the game designers have altered the odds of the game away from those that would naturally occur using cards, making these games slot games. This practice would never be allowed in any reputable offline jurisdiction."
link to original post
At least WinADay isn't hiding that fact.
Sure a reputable jurisdiction would allow VP to not conform to the true odds, they are called Indian reservations with various other classes of machines.
FYI, If you go back far enough, I believe Mike did in fact call them out for somthing or another.
How many royals were you supposed to get on average with the amounts of total hands you played?
I can only estimate the number of hands I played, but I went at least 10 cycles,Quote: VladPutinlol on your indian reservation thing, made me laugh.
How many royals were you supposed to get on average with the amounts of total hands you played?
link to original post