Fast forward over three years and another player issued a similar complaint at The Pogg. This is enough to add them to my blacklist, at least temporarily.
For now, I think my readers deserve a fair warning before they play any Internet casino using Amigotechs software.
Quote: thepoggI just wanted to quickly follow-up on this and say that Amigotechs have been in contact and are reaching out to the player to arrange repayment of the lost funds. I believe they are still investigation the cause of this issue.
Thanks for the update.
Quote: thepoggI have edited my previous post to clarify that Amigotechs are saying that they're investigating, but in my personal opinion there's little to investigate here.
I'll lay 3 to 1 they claim it was another software bug.
Quote: WizardI'll lay 3 to 1 they claim it was another software bug.
I'd give far better odds than that. The simple fact is that the only choice left to them is to deny this was intentional and the fact that they're now stating they're going to pay the player is clear acknowledgement that they know their games have not performed in the correct manner.
With that acknowledgement they only have the choice of trying to pass this off as an error or admitting it's been intentional. Admitting this has been intentional would be commercial suicide for them and all their clients. I don't think 100 to 1 would put you in a bad position.
A. Confuse the issue.
B. Ignore the issue.
C. Claim it was bad luck.
D. Attack the messenger.
Quote: AmigotechsIn the case of JOB50, if the risk flag was raised and the player won a substantial amount, then rather than stopping the game to have it looked at manually, our decision was to let the player continue playing so we could better investigate how our systems were being compromised by the player. In that case we decided to allow the play, while denying the player further wins on his draw hands as they were played using the same cards in multiple browser windows.
They could have stopped the game and freeze the account if they think they were cheated.
What they were doing is just the same as saying "OK you cheated us so we will cheat you back".
Do you have a link to that story or more information? It sounds interesting. From what im reading into somosomeone found a way to exploit the system by using multiple browsers and knew the cards?Quote: andysifThey could have stopped the game and freeze the account if they think they were cheated.
What they were doing is just the same as saying "OK you cheated us so we will cheat you back".
Quote: AxelWolfDo you have a link to that story or more information? It sounds interesting. From what im reading into somosomeone found a way to exploit the system by using multiple browsers and knew the cards?
https://wizardofvegas.com/forum/gambling/online/7774-amigotechs-online-gaming-solutions-warning/
The link in wizard's 1st post
Quote: WizardAlternatives are to:
A. Confuse the issue.
B. Ignore the issue.
C. Claim it was bad luck.
D. Attack the messenger.
The Amigotechs CEO has already tried A and D (by trying to pick apart my article on irrelevant semantics and represent me as non-cooperative, which to all intents and purposes I am). I think they know these aren't working for them and I'll be completely forthright and say you and Eliot Jacobson agreeing to review the results makes it a lot harder to challenge my reputation or the credibility of my conclusion. C would require a denial of anything wrong, which is already undermined by the fact that they're trying to repay - why would they repay if nothing was wrong? That does leave B which I guess is a possibility.
I've heard nothing further regarding the impact on other players or repayment of any affected players baring the complainant.