Quote: gambleheadWhy does every casino require me to have a line bet to shoot the dice?
Because you are the shooter, and the job of the shooter is to set the point.
Now if it really bothers you I suggest you bet the same amount on both pass and don't pass on the come out (doey-don't) and then remove the don't pass bet when the point is set.
If you're betting a quarter on each then you've the option to make a dollar bet on midnight as a hedge against losing the DP if a 12 shows.
He bet only when he was the shooter.
He always bet doey/dont with no odds.
That's all.
No one could figure out what his purpose was. He did it every time I saw him play which was many times.
Quote: gambleheadWhy does every casino require me to have a line bet to shoot the dice?
link to original post
Welcome to the forum.
Why would they let someone who isn't betting play?
Quote: DieterWhy would they let someone who isn't betting play?
You may not understand the nuances of his question.
Take me for example.
When I play craps I rarely roll dem bones anymore because I opt to place bet pretty much exclusively (most of the time) and I eschew a line bet.
The real question is "why don't casinos let a place better with working place bets and no line bet roll the dice?"
There is no sound reason not to allow it that I can see, just conservative adherance to "that's the way it's always been."
Next time I go to the casino I'll try to argue this with the box / floor man just for the hell of it.
Quote: MrVQuote: DieterWhy would they let someone who isn't betting play?
You may not understand the nuances of his question.
Take me for example.
When I play craps I rarely roll dem bones anymore because I opt to place bet pretty much exclusively (most of the time) and I eschew a line bet.
The real question is "why don't casinos let a place better with working place bets and no line bet roll the dice?"
There is no sound reason not to allow it that I can see, just conservative adherance to "that's the way it's always been."
Next time I go to the casino I'll try to argue this with the box / floor man just for the hell of it.
link to original post
To my understanding, the pass/don't pass are the fundamental bets of the game.
Some might view every other bet on the table as a side bet.
If you can take down your bet mid-hand, without a win or loss, the house might be deprived of their edge. The house seems to emphatically prefer not doing that.
I can understand requiring a contract bet of some type before the dice fly, the pass line is a reasonable one to require, and it's reasonable to require it from the shooter.
Curious if the box man will say "you don't have to bet the line or throw the dice" or "you have to bet the line to throw the dice". If there's birdseed, I guess the former.
The house should jump all over it and call me "Gamblin' Jesus" for making that offer which gives a bit of HA to the casino.
Quote: unJonThe dont isnt a contract bet, and theyll let you shoot with a dont bet. So its not that.
link to original post
If you take your don't down, will they take the dice away?
Quote: DieterQuote: unJonThe dont isnt a contract bet, and theyll let you shoot with a dont bet. So its not that.
link to original post
If you take your don't down, will they take the dice away?
link to original post
Point taken
Quote: MrVQuote: DieterWhy would they let someone who isn't betting play?
You may not understand the nuances of his question.
Take me for example.
When I play craps I rarely roll dem bones anymore because I opt to place bet pretty much exclusively (most of the time) and I eschew a line bet.
The real question is "why don't casinos let a place better with working place bets and no line bet roll the dice?"
There is no sound reason not to allow it that I can see, just conservative adherance to "that's the way it's always been."
Next time I go to the casino I'll try to argue this with the box / floor man just for the hell of it.
link to original post
Good point about letting a place bettor with active bets roll.
It really might come down to tradition. Also, don't wives roll for their husbands?
Wives/girlfriends shooting is more about sexism than rule breaking.Quote: AlanMendelsonAlso, don't wives roll for their husbands?
link to original post
Often they roll FOR their male partner who does have a line bet.
Usually if the get an actual turn of their own, they have a second line bet down.
The only problem comes when the lady is not betting until she gets her chance to roll. But, since we love to see those ladies lean over the edge of the table to get the dice, and jump up and down when they get excited over a good roll, who would object?
For reasons of continuity and tradition each Shooter today must bet on either Pass or a comparatively recent counterpart called Don't Pass.
Dark Side bets became available in the early decades of the last century. Place bets were invented after Nevada made gambling legal. Bonus Craps, Fire Bet, and others are very recent additions. At the core always was the original bet called Pass.
I don't do things like that anymore.
Quote: AlanMendelsonYears ago when I was a regular at Bellagio a guy came in at 5am on Sundays to play craps.
He bet only when he was the shooter.
He always bet doey/dont with no odds.
That's all.
No one could figure out what his purpose was. He did it every time I saw him play which was many times.
link to original post
I can think of three possibilities, all governed by the iron rule that he lose the least amount of money possible. And one extra.
1. He was feigning going to church, but went to the casino instead
2. He was looking to score alcohol before the liquor stores opened at noon, and the casino gave it away for free!
3. He was there for pure entertainment.
4. He was trying out his latent telekinetic powers....
1. The shooter must have skin in the game, and therefore a goal.
2. A contract bet (which includes the Don't) is required to ensure point 1 operates hroughout the pass.
Place bets do not fulfill #2, as one said, unless the casino allows a change that forces the shooter to leave up a place bet throughout the pass. But that just adds to the dealers' workloads, so the casinos reject that solution.
The Don't being removable is only the casino working in their best interest. But it is still a contract bet, and they can refuse to allow the shooter to remove the bet to ensure #1 is still in force.
I have seen a shooter ejected mid-pass exactly once, playing Harrahs' Chester/Philly. He somehow snapped a corner off one die and rolled, and was tackled by security and hustled away. The roll, which was didn't resolve the point, was allowed, but the player was ejected. I don't remember if the next shooter kept rolling to try to make the busted shooter's point of not (this was years ago). The layout had one big ugly scratch down it (he was shooting opposite hook), and they had to get the table re-covered.
Lastly, I have seen one rule that doesn't get mentioned a whole lot, and appears to be optionally enforced: If the next person to shoot has not been betting, the stick will pass them by and offer the dice to the next person down the line. Now, you can not bet for 14 of the 16 people at the table, but you better put up some money when the guy ahead of you shoots if you're determined to roll dem bones.
Anyone else experience this last one?
The Stick may refuse the dice if they or the Box/Dealers verify that there has been "no action". If none, they may go on to the next
person who has made at least minimum passline or place bets. At an Indian casino I've seen them do that if they think there has not
been "sufficient" action.
These days it's prudent to bet on the person right before you when you are trying to minimize betting on others(if you want to shoot).
I've seen it when the player has just squeezed in and turns out he is to the left of the last shooter by coincidence.Quote: onebokI've seen it many times.
The Stick may refuse the dice if they or the Box/Dealers verify that there has been "no action". If none, they may go on to the next
person who has made at least minimum passline or place bets. At an Indian casino I've seen them do that if they think there has not
been "sufficient" action.
These days it's prudent to bet on the person right before you when you are trying to minimize betting on others(if you want to shoot).
link to original post
What we need is someone to bet the Don't as shooter, get a point set, then decline to roll the dice, and see what the house says and does ... at various casinos
She agreed with me that my proposal would give the house a greater advantage against me than had I made a PL bet, yet she refused my offer without explanation, other than "that's not how it's done."
I think the rule should change as WGAS what the shooter bets, all that is needed is to have new numbers established.
Also... some casinos do not allow bets on Bonus Craps or Fire Bet without a minimum bet somewhere else on the table.
Quote: AlanMendelsonsome casinos do not allow bets on Bonus Craps or Fire Bet without a minimum bet somewhere else on the table.
link to original post
Shows how dumb casinos are. We will not allow a -20% wager, unless you make a -1.41% passerine bet!
Quote: DeMangoQuote: AlanMendelsonsome casinos do not allow bets on Bonus Craps or Fire Bet without a minimum bet somewhere else on the table.
link to original post
Shows how dumb casinos are. We will not allow a -20% wager, unless you make a -1.41% passerine bet!
link to original post
I guess Red Rock doesnt want anyone to bet $5 on the All Tall Small ($15 total) and walk out with $1065.
Unfortunately for Red Rock the ATS hits there. Must be loaded dice.
Without that rule, you would have a table full of people chasing the ATS and llaying nothing else. Notinhg to offset if it wins.
16 players all playing the bonus, the casino makes 240 (5-5-5 bet) everytime 7 rolls (plus 1 PL loss) but risks 17,040 if it hits (on the 30-150 paytable)
Quote: PlayYourCardsRightI don't think its a dumb rule at all.
Without that rule, you would have a table full of people chasing the ATS and llaying nothing else. Notinhg to offset if it wins.
16 players all playing the bonus, the casino makes 240 (5-5-5 bet) everytime 7 rolls (plus 1 PL loss) but risks 17,040 if it hits (on the 30-150 paytable)
link to original post
Well put.
A lot of small casinos won't even offer bets like the ATS and Fire DESPITE their big house advantage because they know just ONE HIT could knock out a day's profits.
I remember when the old Gold Strike in Jean had $3 minimum craps. I asked why they didnt offer the Fire Bet? They told me if it hit once for $5000 it would crush them for a week.
Sometimes the edge doesnt matter. But the payoff does. And I realize that's a controversial statement to make on a forum like this one.
Quote: AlanMendelsonSometimes the edge doesnt matter. But the payoff does. And I realize that's a controversial statement to make on a forum like this one.
link to original post
I don't see Risk of Ruin as particularly controversial.
What you saw seems like a pretty common Risk of Ruin concern, although from a direction not often considered by players.
I can't tell if they're prostitutes or just hustlers, but I've seen the same women slowly get themself situated to a craps game to "watch and learn." When all the horny men strike up conversations why they're not betting, the CT's tell them that it's their first time and they don't know how to play. They also tell them that the game looks intimidating and they're too scared to put their own money to play. Amost with 100% certainty, the men will drop them a passline bet and put odds behind them to get friendly with the CT. I've actually seen these CT's work a whole table and get thrown a bunch of green and black chips for rolling well. A lot of times, they have no wager, but they roll because the box knows it's good for business.
I wouldn't be surprised if these CT's pull in close to 6-figure a year.
I say let the eye candy trade on their good looks. The looks don't last long anyway.
Quote: BillHasRetiredI've heard them called "Virgin Marys", rather sarcastically. I'll admit to floating a bet for them when I'm feeling mellow and wildly ahead. Why? Gambling is mostly entertainment for me--my goals are to win a decent amount and have fun. Talking to some eye candy (but guarding the chips) is as good a way to spend an evening as any. Sure I might be passing up megabucks, but as my handle says, I am retired and very comfortable.
I say let the eye candy trade on their good looks. The looks don't last long anyway.
link to original post
No judgement here. I rather admire these "Virgin Marys." They're no different than "Bottle Rats," who are good looking girls who sit at night club tables and drink/party at the expense of bunch of dudes who paid thousands to reserve a table. The only difference is these Virgin Marys are taking home hard cash without risking any of their money and somewhat keeping their dignity. If you are satisfied with spending some time at the craps table with eye candy and you're rendered some tips to them in exchange, that's a great mutually beneficial arrangement.
Instead I married them.
Quote: gambleheadWhy does every casino require me to have a line bet to shoot the dice?
link to original post
This is not true. Anyone with a line bet can enable someone else to shoot the dice on their money. This happens with guys who have money and would prefer for a lucky lady to shoot the dice.
Now that I answered your question, how about you answer my question:
Why do people ask so many fallacious loaded questions?
Here's some more RAA approaches to demonstrate the compound element to your loaded question fallacy:
Ask if you can make a don't pass bet and after shooting to establish the point, ask the casino if they will allow you to remove your bet, but still continue shooting with no other action until you find out if you would have lost or not to decide if you feel like shooting again. Tell them you will ONLY bet if they allow this, and offer to make a maximum bet. I think you'll find that there are casinos that will allow you to shoot the dice with no bets on the felt at all if this cooperation with you means that you are giving up a 33% advantage on the 4/10, a 20% math advantage on the 5/9, and a 9.09% advantage on the 6/8 that would have been to your don't-pass-bet's favor out of superstition fearing an unlikely loss.
Now transitively that I have demonstrated the fallacious nature of your initial question that embeds a false claim in it, you probably have the one-word answer why:
The casino is a business. That is why.
I learned that years ago when I tried to market a predecessor to my Poker For Roulette game.Quote: AlanMendelsonSometimes the edge doesnt matter. But the payoff does. And I realize that's a controversial statement to make on a forum like this one.
link to original post
In short, casinos love gamblers, but hate gambling.