Long time reader, new member and contributor here. I was invited to a tournament in Vegas for free and was wondering the following:
1) Is it a good idea to buy in with real money for extra tournament money before the start of play and
2) Is it good to rebuy if you bust out.
Also, do the same standards apply to different tournaments (21, slots, craps, poker, etc.)
Thanks.
Quote: DarksideHello,
Long time reader, new member and contributor here. I was invited to a tournament in Vegas for free and was wondering the following:
1) Is it a good idea to buy in with real money for extra tournament money before the start of play and
2) Is it good to rebuy if you bust out.
Also, do the same standards apply to different tournaments (21, slots, craps, poker, etc.)
Thanks.
1. Yes. That money usually is for the dealers and almost everyone does it. If you don't, you start short-stacked.
2. That is personal opinion IMHO. You are going to re-start with a new, smaller stack. I have been in some where you have to wait for a seat if the seating is full, stopping momentum and making your relative stack smaller yet.
Can't answer on other tournament types, never been.
Quote: DarksideHello,
Long time reader, new member and contributor here. I was invited to a tournament in Vegas for free and was wondering the following:
1) Is it a good idea to buy in with real money for extra tournament money before the start of play and
2) Is it good to rebuy if you bust out.
Also, do the same standards apply to different tournaments (21, slots, craps, poker, etc.)
Thanks.
Welcome to the forum, darkside.
My opinion is, rebuy value is determined by the size of the field, payout schedule, and payout currency (cash, free play, one-time chips, etc.) It also matters whether the rebuy is offered for comp points or only cash, whether different tiers get different rebuy opportunities, and what round you need to decide by.
Most places publish the payout and values: most hosts - tournament organizers will answer how many they expect or have registered a day or so ahead if you ask nicely. I don't think there's one right answer. I could be wrong. Personally, I don't rebuy except once I chased it, thinking there was value, and while there might have been, I didn't win.
Not sure whether your "standards" is specific to your rebuy questions above or more general.
If general, Tournaments usually have different bet strategies than just playing the game, because you're playing other people, not the house. A long and complicated topic for most games. We'd probably need specific info on which game, how many rounds, house tournament rules, and such, to give you a useful answer.
Edit: AZD is right; I've only seen it recently where they explained the rebuy was for the dealers, and I did do that. Good point.
The extra buy in and/or rebuy is for more tournament chips, either to start with a larger base stack, or get back in. I have no way of knowing how big the field will be.
Quote: DarksideBy "standards", I mean should you use the same buy in strategy universally, or do it/don't do it depending on the tournament game.
The extra buy in and/or rebuy is for more tournament chips, either to start with a larger base stack, or get back in. I have no way of knowing how big the field will be.
Sorry I didn't make it clear I understood that. I still think you have to value the tournament price. I don't think there's a single yes or no answer.
If you have the money to burn, sure. If it's a small field, and the rebuy is a significant extra percentage, and the rebuy is like, $50, again sure.
If you only get 20% more for $500 rebuy, in a field of 1000 , and higher-tier get that $500 comped but you don't, and they're only paying 50 places, most less than $1k, and it's free play that has to be spun in a slot...
probably not. Which was a roulette tournament I did a while back. I didn't rebuy. I still got 12th. Luckbox.
Again, I could be wrong.
Quote: Darkside
1) Is it a good idea to buy in with real money for extra tournament money before the start of play and
2) Is it good to rebuy if you bust out.
Also, do the same standards apply to different tournaments (21, slots, craps, poker, etc.)
Generally speaking...
1. Yes.
2. Yes.
I think re-buys are a shake down and I generally don't do tournaments that allow them. It would not surprise me if many tournaments collect more in re-buy and extra-chip money than they give out as prize money. However, in every tournament I've seen, both are a good value, if you must play. You need all the ammunition you can get in a tournament and there is almost always an economy of scale in getting the extra chips. This goes for all types of tournaments, except maybe poker.
The problem with poker rebuys is that you re-enter the poker tournament with a "starting chip stack" at a time where the average stack size is bigger than the starting stack size. So if I bust out at a point where only half the players are left and I rebuy, I am at a big chip disadvantage. It just doesn't seem to me like its a +EV move. I would only consider a poker re-buy if I busted out very early.
Quote: gordonm888The problem with poker rebuys is that you re-enter the poker tournament with a "starting chip stack" at a time where the average stack size is bigger than the starting stack size. So if I bust out at a point where only half the players are left and I rebuy, I am at a big chip disadvantage. It just doesn't seem to me like its a +EV move. I would only consider a poker re-buy if I busted out very early.
I would say that if your skill level is significantly greater than your opponents or the cost of the re-buy is less than (total prize money)*(your stack)/(total chips in play + future chips put in play), then re-buy.
In other words, absent being blinded out or collusion, and assuming equal skill, your equity is proportional to your stack.
I feel obligated to note this here, as there are only 2 posts (above) on this account. Normally this would be behind-the-scenes, or the offense would be evident.
Why do people do this? I would like to have him continue to participate, but 4 accounts, each shut off for dupe id's, is beyond my ability to override. His previous, most successful sock, he signed in yesterday then made the new account the same day, so it's not like he lost the password.
Guess it could be a previously banned member, and it's not associating with the ban atm. Someone else suggests buzz. I'm guessing not, because buzz has been on 8 times with other (non-intersecting) names while these accounts were active, but could be. Writing style also seems different to me.