Tim1492
Tim1492
  • Threads: 1
  • Posts: 4
Joined: Jan 17, 2014
January 17th, 2014 at 12:46:33 PM permalink
So last night I was thinking about it...i'm new to the site by the way....However I came up with a full proof system. Its like the martingale but it can't lose....well it can in a short run but eventually is a winner.

Place a dollar on the 12. Loses..progressively increase each bet a dollar for each loss in a row....1 then 2 then 3 etc until it hits. Say you get to 30 dollars....you win....yes you spent 435 dollars to get there but you yield a winning of 465 bucks...Anyone have experience with this? Obviously for each win you bring it back to 1 dollar.
darthvader
darthvader
  • Threads: 11
  • Posts: 226
Joined: Jul 7, 2012
January 17th, 2014 at 12:51:32 PM permalink
And what is your guarantee of the eventual 12?
7-out, line away, pay the don't. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=esEcwAWi6dk
sodawater
sodawater
  • Threads: 64
  • Posts: 3321
Joined: May 14, 2012
January 17th, 2014 at 12:54:12 PM permalink
i love taking betting systems advice from people who don't know how to spell "fool."

Let me ask you this:

The chances of getting a 12 are 35 losers and 1 winner. But they only pay 30 to 1. So every single bet you make, you are taking the worst of it. How do you add up a bunch of negative numbers to get a positive number? If you know please PM me.
Tim1492
Tim1492
  • Threads: 1
  • Posts: 4
Joined: Jan 17, 2014
January 17th, 2014 at 12:57:08 PM permalink
I know how to spell..lmao....But a 12 could not show up for a while...you need a sizable bankroll..but it is nearly full proof..the chances of no 12 bein thrown is 35/36 but when that one 12 hits. its a nice payday.
darthvader
darthvader
  • Threads: 11
  • Posts: 226
Joined: Jul 7, 2012
January 17th, 2014 at 12:58:27 PM permalink
And BTW, if you extend your mathematical analysis far enough, you will see that it is NOT a guaranteed winner. As with all martingale systems, it falls apart when the actual results run to the far end of the possible variance working against you. That is, the 12 will come about nominally once every 36 rolls. But what happens when it doesn't show up for 50 rolls? 60 rolls etc?
7-out, line away, pay the don't. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=esEcwAWi6dk
Tim1492
Tim1492
  • Threads: 1
  • Posts: 4
Joined: Jan 17, 2014
January 17th, 2014 at 1:02:36 PM permalink
Well 50 rolls you need a bankroll of roughly 1300.....but if you go 50 rolls without a 12 that's just bad luck...But if you get to the 50th roll and it does hit...that's still 300 dollar profit however it will take much longer
AxiomOfChoice
AxiomOfChoice
  • Threads: 32
  • Posts: 5761
Joined: Sep 12, 2012
January 17th, 2014 at 1:04:34 PM permalink
Quote: Tim1492

I know how to spell..



No you don't.

Quote:

lmao....But a 12 could not show up for a while...you need a sizable bankroll..



I think you mean infinite bankroll.

Quote:

but it is nearly full proof..



See, there you go not knowing how to spell again.
darthvader
darthvader
  • Threads: 11
  • Posts: 226
Joined: Jul 7, 2012
January 17th, 2014 at 1:05:53 PM permalink
Keep going..... Eventually it is a loser. And when it does it loses BIG.
7-out, line away, pay the don't. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=esEcwAWi6dk
michael99000
michael99000
  • Threads: 9
  • Posts: 2113
Joined: Jul 10, 2010
January 17th, 2014 at 1:09:00 PM permalink
Quote: Tim1492

but if you go 50 rolls without a 12 that's just bad luck.



A full proof, or heck even a fool proof system....should never rely on having to avoid bad luck.
darthvader
darthvader
  • Threads: 11
  • Posts: 226
Joined: Jul 7, 2012
January 17th, 2014 at 1:09:36 PM permalink
The odds of no 12 for n rolls is (35/36) to the nth power. So while you might nominally think that the odds of getting a ridiculously large number of rolls without a 12 is small, it isn't as small as you think:

60 rolls: 18%
70 rolls: 14%
80 rolls: 10%
90 rolls: 8%
100 rolls: 6%

That's a fairly high risk of ruin.
7-out, line away, pay the don't. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=esEcwAWi6dk
AxiomOfChoice
AxiomOfChoice
  • Threads: 32
  • Posts: 5761
Joined: Sep 12, 2012
January 17th, 2014 at 1:13:46 PM permalink
Quote: Tim1492

Well 50 rolls you need a bankroll of roughly 1300.....but if you go 50 rolls without a 12 that's just bad luck...But if you get to the 50th roll and it does hit...that's still 300 dollar profit however it will take much longer



What do you think that the probability of going 50 rolls without a 12 is?

Suppose that you are going to do this until you win 10 times, then quit (so, 10 12's will have been rolled). What do you think the probability of going 50 rolls without a 12 at some point during that time is?

The really funny part about this is that you are looking to risk n(n-1)/2 units to win 30*n units. If your math was as good as your spelling, you might notice that the first term is quadratic and the 2nd term is linear. This is not going to end well. (hint: what happens when your streak of no-12 rolls passes 61?).

But don't worry. That will never happen! If by "never" you mean, more often than 1 time in 6. Sort of like how 7's "never" roll at craps. I don't understand why everyone just doesn't win money at this game.
Sabretom2
Sabretom2
  • Threads: 11
  • Posts: 718
Joined: Mar 3, 2013
January 17th, 2014 at 1:23:30 PM permalink
How's that for a nice, friendly, "welcome to the forum".
AxiomOfChoice
AxiomOfChoice
  • Threads: 32
  • Posts: 5761
Joined: Sep 12, 2012
January 17th, 2014 at 1:29:04 PM permalink
Quote: Sabretom2

How's that for a nice, friendly, "welcome to the forum".



Oh, come on. He didn't even get suspended for violating rule 10.
Beethoven9th
Beethoven9th
  • Threads: 75
  • Posts: 5072
Joined: Jul 30, 2012
January 17th, 2014 at 1:29:31 PM permalink
Quote: Sabretom2

How's that for a nice, friendly, "welcome to the forum".


Well, s2pid posts aren't generally welcomed with open arms around here.
Fighting BS one post at a time!
BleedingChipsSlowly
BleedingChipsSlowly
  • Threads: 23
  • Posts: 1033
Joined: Jul 9, 2010
January 17th, 2014 at 1:33:47 PM permalink
Wow, great system. Start with a bankroll of $1770, which will allow you to pony up 59 progressive bets. Sweet payoff? The sweetness starts to sour after the 30th spin, and there is a better than 40% chance that will happen. If you win on the 59th spin you cover the losses and break even. If you don't hit in 59 spins further progressive bets won't cover the total loss. There is a better than 18% chance of total ruin. Systems like this keep the lights on in Las Vegas.
“You don’t bring a bone saw to a negotiation.” - Robert Jordan, former U.S. ambassador to Saudi Arabia
odiousgambit
odiousgambit
  • Threads: 326
  • Posts: 9556
Joined: Nov 9, 2009
January 17th, 2014 at 1:40:41 PM permalink
Get Wincraps, guy. Then you can simulate these things. Cloudcity software, google it.

I checked it out and the variance is wild, wild, wild. Your bankroll can be positive after a lot of rolls, thousands of rolls, but the big dips in the meantime are murderous. Long before 10,000 rolls the dive off the cliff ensues where you've lost 10s of thousands. The first image shows one high point. Could you have manned-up for the nearly six grand down in the meantime?

The last image shows the big dive you'll never come back from. This was the longest run I saw before I got bored, btw, other theoretical players did not do so good.



the next time Dame Fortune toys with your heart, your soul and your wallet, raise your glass and praise her thus: “Thanks for nothing, you cold-hearted, evil, damnable, nefarious, low-life, malicious monster from Hell!”   She is, after all, stone deaf. ... Arnold Snyder
darthvader
darthvader
  • Threads: 11
  • Posts: 226
Joined: Jul 7, 2012
January 17th, 2014 at 1:44:59 PM permalink
Damn the torpedoes; Full speed ahead!
7-out, line away, pay the don't. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=esEcwAWi6dk
aceofspades
aceofspades
  • Threads: 366
  • Posts: 6506
Joined: Apr 4, 2012
January 17th, 2014 at 1:49:50 PM permalink
My stomach is so fool from dinner.
wudged
wudged
  • Threads: 2
  • Posts: 998
Joined: Aug 7, 2013
January 17th, 2014 at 2:00:24 PM permalink
Just wait 50 rolls without a 12 before you start your progression! Dubble full prüf!
AxiomOfChoice
AxiomOfChoice
  • Threads: 32
  • Posts: 5761
Joined: Sep 12, 2012
January 17th, 2014 at 2:04:42 PM permalink
I think I understand. "Full proof" describes the beverages that were consumed while creating the betting system.
befamous7
befamous7
  • Threads: 15
  • Posts: 92
Joined: Sep 9, 2013
January 17th, 2014 at 2:09:51 PM permalink
Quote: Tim1492

So last night I was thinking about it...i'm new to the site by the way....However I came up with a full proof system. Its like the martingale but it can't lose....well it can in a short run but eventually is a winner.

Place a dollar on the 12. Loses..progressively increase each bet a dollar for each loss in a row....1 then 2 then 3 etc until it hits. Say you get to 30 dollars....you win....yes you spent 435 dollars to get there but you yield a winning of 465 bucks...Anyone have experience with this? Obviously for each win you bring it back to 1 dollar.



I've never tried it nor have I ever seen anyone else try it. Why not give it a try yourself? If I were to implement a system like this I would take myself to the roulette table and stick with one number. Sure the chances are 1/38 in roulette instead of 1/36 in craps but roulette pays 35:1 and craps pays 30:1. $1 roulette minimum may be more difficult to find but if you're that positive your system will work then it's worth finding $1 min.
AxelWolf
AxelWolf
  • Threads: 164
  • Posts: 22272
Joined: Oct 10, 2012
January 17th, 2014 at 2:14:51 PM permalink
Are you guys 100 percent sure this system wont work? Come on guys, he was thinking last night and poof there it was, a fool proof system. Sounds like a winner to me. Whats the best conditions/table for this system? What place has the highest amount of Biased dice geared towards 12? What if I use DI on this system? Should I put a down payment on that new Lambo I was wanting?
♪♪Now you swear and kick and beg us That you're not a gamblin' man Then you find you're back in Vegas With a handle in your hand♪♪ Your black cards can make you money So you hide them when you're able In the land of casinos and money You must put them on the table♪♪ You go back Jack do it again roulette wheels turinin' 'round and 'round♪♪ You go back Jack do it again♪♪
PBguy
PBguy
  • Threads: 4
  • Posts: 278
Joined: Sep 4, 2013
January 17th, 2014 at 3:19:34 PM permalink
Two stumbling blocks to any system like this are bankroll and table maximums.

Most craps tables I've played require you to have another bet placed besides the $1 bet on the 12. That has to be considered too.
Tim1492
Tim1492
  • Threads: 1
  • Posts: 4
Joined: Jan 17, 2014
January 17th, 2014 at 3:41:14 PM permalink
I'm being honest...I'm rather disappointed at all the scrutiny around here. It was something I thought about and seemed like a good idea. Where the spelling mistakes were? I have no idea but I am not to pleased with the reactions of others. Could be a little more gracious instead of self righteous pricks.
Beethoven9th
Beethoven9th
  • Threads: 75
  • Posts: 5072
Joined: Jul 30, 2012
January 17th, 2014 at 3:59:17 PM permalink
Quote: Tim1492

I'm being honest...I'm rather disappointed at all the scrutiny around here. It was something I thought about and seemed like a good idea. Where the spelling mistakes were? I have no idea but I am not to pleased with the reactions of others. Could be a little more gracious instead of self righteous pricks.


That's your problem right there. It's not a "good idea". Not even close. Any other silly idea would get the same reaction.
Fighting BS one post at a time!
endermike
endermike
  • Threads: 7
  • Posts: 584
Joined: Dec 10, 2013
January 17th, 2014 at 4:00:45 PM permalink
Sorry Tim.

However, your post falls more into the category of betting systems; maybe you would have gotten a more receptive response there (but I doubt it).

More to the point, your thread title and first post were rather over confident. The tone of this site is very negative towards betting systems. However, I can tell you that "just say no" is probably the safest message regarding those. The fact that you know of and compared your idea to Martingale is a good sign you should have had a bit more caution.

Sorry.
Wizard
Administrator
Wizard
  • Threads: 1491
  • Posts: 26435
Joined: Oct 14, 2009
January 17th, 2014 at 4:04:58 PM permalink
Quote: Tim1492

Could be a little more gracious instead of self righteous pricks.



Profanity + personal insult = five-day suspension
"For with much wisdom comes much sorrow." -- Ecclesiastes 1:18 (NIV)
befamous7
befamous7
  • Threads: 15
  • Posts: 92
Joined: Sep 9, 2013
January 17th, 2014 at 4:06:15 PM permalink
Quote: Tim1492

I'm being honest...I'm rather disappointed at all the scrutiny around here. It was something I thought about and seemed like a good idea. Where the spelling mistakes were? I have no idea but I am not to pleased with the reactions of others. Could be a little more gracious instead of self righteous pricks.



Scrutiny is inevitable around here. Some people on this forum are infatuated with proving others wrong. Frequently I find it in the form a snarky comment or an overstated essay.

I posted a constructive response. Hopefully you read it that way.
ontariodealer
ontariodealer
  • Threads: 7
  • Posts: 999
Joined: Aug 5, 2013
January 17th, 2014 at 4:11:00 PM permalink
I've told this story on another board before....a couple of years ago we had a player who tried this system on the yo. He would come to the high limit table and start with a $1 yo and then progress. First thing he did was piss off all the bigger players but he won for a few months. Not only that but to shoot he would go 30 pass, 30 DP and a buck on the 12 and was getting rated for 60 bucks. He played quite often and his wife loved him because they started getting some pretty good comps.

Two things happened, first they stopped giving him the 60 rating (which they should have had all the time) and second, one friday the yo didn't come, he progressed right up to the table max $800 yo and still no yo...after a few 800 dollar shots he called it a day figuring this was the one bad day (he was still up for the three or four months he played). He came back the next day and still no yo....right up to 800 and quite a few shots at 800 until he broke down sobbing and had to be helped out. Never seen him again.,
get second you pig
treetopbuddy
treetopbuddy
  • Threads: 34
  • Posts: 1739
Joined: Jan 12, 2013
January 17th, 2014 at 4:11:51 PM permalink
I've got a half full proof system that I'm selling.
Each day is better than the next
mickeycrimm
mickeycrimm
  • Threads: 62
  • Posts: 2299
Joined: Jul 13, 2013
January 17th, 2014 at 4:17:51 PM permalink
The only fool proof system is to own the table.
"Quit trying your luck and start trying your skill." Mickey Crimm
Alan
Alan
  • Threads: 17
  • Posts: 582
Joined: Jun 14, 2011
January 17th, 2014 at 4:24:52 PM permalink
I think it works better with snake eyes.[grin]
Beardgoat
Beardgoat
  • Threads: 29
  • Posts: 876
Joined: Apr 2, 2012
January 17th, 2014 at 4:28:48 PM permalink
Sounds like the "full proof" system guy at my work was talking about today as he let everyone at the work place know he is a winner at the .02 slots on the Indian reservation. Says he is up thousands and has a ton of nice shit in his backyard. I had to bite my lip
AxiomOfChoice
AxiomOfChoice
  • Threads: 32
  • Posts: 5761
Joined: Sep 12, 2012
January 17th, 2014 at 4:49:00 PM permalink
Quote: ontariodealer

I've told this story on another board before....a couple of years ago we had a player who tried this system on the yo. He would come to the high limit table and start with a $1 yo and then progress. First thing he did was piss off all the bigger players but he won for a few months. Not only that but to shoot he would go 30 pass, 30 DP and a buck on the 12 and was getting rated for 60 bucks. He played quite often and his wife loved him because they started getting some pretty good comps.

Two things happened, first they stopped giving him the 60 rating (which they should have had all the time) and second, one friday the yo didn't come, he progressed right up to the table max $800 yo and still no yo...after a few 800 dollar shots he called it a day figuring this was the one bad day (he was still up for the three or four months he played). He came back the next day and still no yo....right up to 800 and quite a few shots at 800 until he broke down sobbing and had to be helped out. Never seen him again.,



Was he martingale-ing? Or some other progression? (I'm just curious, how many steps from 1 to 800?)
kubikulann
kubikulann
  • Threads: 27
  • Posts: 905
Joined: Jun 28, 2011
January 17th, 2014 at 5:11:17 PM permalink
Excuse my less-than-good mastery of English. Maybe he was meaning "full of craps"?
Reperiet qui quaesiverit
endermike
endermike
  • Threads: 7
  • Posts: 584
Joined: Dec 10, 2013
January 17th, 2014 at 5:15:50 PM permalink
Quote: kubikulann

Excuse my less-than-good mastery of English. Maybe he was meaning "full of craps"?



WHAMMY!
Buzzard
Buzzard
  • Threads: 90
  • Posts: 6814
Joined: Oct 28, 2012
January 17th, 2014 at 5:19:51 PM permalink
When I worked on International circuits at AT&T, I was always amazed at Korean or Japanese technicians apologizing for less than perfect English. Despite the fact it was their second language and they spoke it better than 90% of Americans.

Also tested Australian circuits and really got lost occasionally. While working on a trouble, an Australian girl named Angel asked me if I wanted her to POST me a VIEW. I said no thanks, having no idea what I had turned down. Later found out from one of the guys, that she had offered to MAIL me her PICTURE, in a bikini most likely.

I also found out that Canadians do say EH a lot, Not just in a Saturday Night Live skit, EH ?
Shed not for her the bitter tear Nor give the heart to vain regret Tis but the casket that lies here, The gem that filled it Sparkles yet
sodawater
sodawater
  • Threads: 64
  • Posts: 3321
Joined: May 14, 2012
January 17th, 2014 at 6:04:11 PM permalink
Quote: ontariodealer

Not only that but to shoot he would go 30 pass, 30 DP and a buck on the 12 and was getting rated for 60 bucks. He played quite often and his wife loved him because they started getting some pretty good comps.

... they stopped giving him the 60 rating (which they should have had all the time) ...




A player betting $30 pass and $30 dp simultaneously should be rated at $60 per hand. Why would you disagree with this? He is paying $60* the mean house edge for the line bets. In fact the casinos should love this customer. He pays double the house edge of a $30 player with the additional benefit that he can never win, he can only lose. He deserved the full $60 rating and frankly any casino employee who disagrees has shown he doesn't understand how house edge works.
AxiomOfChoice
AxiomOfChoice
  • Threads: 32
  • Posts: 5761
Joined: Sep 12, 2012
January 17th, 2014 at 6:15:11 PM permalink
Quote: sodawater

A player betting $30 pass and $30 dp simultaneously should be rated at $60 per hand. Why would you disagree with this? He is paying $60* the mean house edge for the line bets. In fact the casinos should love this customer. He pays double the house edge of a $30 player with the additional benefit that he can never win, he can only lose. He deserved the full $60 rating and frankly any casino employee who disagrees has shown he doesn't understand how house edge works.



Yeah but if he only bets when he is shooting, then he doesn't deserve the full rating. At a 6-player table he should be rated at $10 plus whatever he gets for his yo bets (which, honestly, should be multiplied by something since the house edge is so high on those bets)
sodawater
sodawater
  • Threads: 64
  • Posts: 3321
Joined: May 14, 2012
January 17th, 2014 at 6:21:14 PM permalink
yeah agree as long as his 30 pass and 30 DP counts for 60 total -- many, many casino employees will argue against this till theyre blue in the face because he "isnt risking anything"
djatc
djatc
  • Threads: 83
  • Posts: 4477
Joined: Jan 15, 2013
January 17th, 2014 at 6:24:02 PM permalink
As per the hot chick thread:

1. Be female
2. Be hot
3. Have a basic understanding of craps
4. Buyin at a high roller table for $500 or so
5. Flirt with the players, get them to place bets for you
6. ????
7. +EV
"Man Babes" #AxelFabulous
offTopic
offTopic
  • Threads: 1
  • Posts: 44
Joined: Dec 6, 2013
January 17th, 2014 at 6:31:51 PM permalink
Many years ago, I was at a table in (I think) Harvey's Lake Tahoe where a guy was doing this on the High-Low. I can't remember where he was when I got there, but he blew through what he had in his racks, took a marker for 1K, lost that, shrugged and left. Of course, a few minutes later, a shooter throws 3 12s out of 4 rolls.
mds
mds
  • Threads: 50
  • Posts: 261
Joined: Sep 24, 2013
January 17th, 2014 at 6:35:25 PM permalink
Quote: sodawater

A player betting $30 pass and $30 dp simultaneously should be rated at $60 per hand. Why would you disagree with this? He is paying $60* the mean house edge for the line bets. In fact the casinos should love this customer. He pays double the house edge of a $30 player with the additional benefit that he can never win, he can only lose. He deserved the full $60 rating and frankly any casino employee who disagrees has shown he doesn't understand how house edge works.



Absolutely right sodawater. In Vegas, Wynn, Aria and all MGM casino, Caesars and Harrahs count the Doey/Don't as your avg bet! I have a friend who plays 1000 don't with 600 odds and 700 pass most of the time. He doesn't play full odds which is 6*..(Don't know why) His avg, 1,700.00... He does throw 25.00 on the 12 every other time which has saved him from big losses.
ontariodealer
ontariodealer
  • Threads: 7
  • Posts: 999
Joined: Aug 5, 2013
January 17th, 2014 at 7:13:33 PM permalink
Quote: sodawater

A player betting $30 pass and $30 dp simultaneously should be rated at $60 per hand. Why would you disagree with this? He is paying $60* the mean house edge for the line bets. In fact the casinos should love this customer. He pays double the house edge of a $30 player with the additional benefit that he can never win, he can only lose. He deserved the full $60 rating and frankly any casino employee who disagrees has shown he doesn't understand how house edge works.



no you don't understand, stick to serving fries. He gets rated for his a % of his expected loss which in this case is minimal.
get second you pig
ontariodealer
ontariodealer
  • Threads: 7
  • Posts: 999
Joined: Aug 5, 2013
January 17th, 2014 at 7:15:57 PM permalink
Quote: AxiomOfChoice

Was he martingale-ing? Or some other progression? (I'm just curious, how many steps from 1 to 800?)



he had a progression, I had seen a similar one years ago (larry edell maybe)....it goes up one unit at a time then eventually 2 units etc etc.
get second you pig
Ibeatyouraces
Ibeatyouraces
  • Threads: 68
  • Posts: 11933
Joined: Jan 12, 2010
January 17th, 2014 at 7:21:59 PM permalink
deleted
DUHHIIIIIIIII HEARD THAT!
AxiomOfChoice
AxiomOfChoice
  • Threads: 32
  • Posts: 5761
Joined: Sep 12, 2012
January 17th, 2014 at 7:23:29 PM permalink
Quote: ontariodealer

he had a progression, I had seen a similar one years ago (larry edell maybe)....it goes up one unit at a time then eventually 2 units etc etc.



Any idea how many rolls to get to $800? Not that it matters, but I am curious to see how unlikely of a scenario getting to $800 twice in a row without winning is?
sodawater
sodawater
  • Threads: 64
  • Posts: 3321
Joined: May 14, 2012
January 17th, 2014 at 7:24:36 PM permalink
Quote: ontariodealer

no you don't understand, stick to serving fries. He gets rated for his a % of his expected loss which in this case is minimal.




Expected loss of a player who bets $60 pass only: $60 * 1.41% = $0.85 per bet made

Expected loss of a player who bets $60 don't pass only: $60 * 1.36% = $0.82 per bet made

Expected loss of a player who bets $30 pass and $30 don't pass simultaneously : $30 * 1.41% + $30 * 1.36% = $0.83 combined per bet made


Care to apologize? Care to admit that you've worked in a casino for several years and STILL don't understand the grade-school math that pays your salary?
Twirdman
Twirdman
  • Threads: 0
  • Posts: 1004
Joined: Jun 5, 2013
January 17th, 2014 at 7:26:39 PM permalink
Quote: ontariodealer

no you don't understand, stick to serving fries. He gets rated for his a % of his expected loss which in this case is minimal.



What do you mean his theo remains unchanged. On a roll of 12 he loses the pass bet and push the don't pass. That means 1/36 rolls he will lose 1/2 of his bet or 1.39% which is the average of the expected loss from a pass and don't pass. Any other scenario he gets 0 dollars so yeah his expected loss is hardly minimal it is exactly what it would be expected to be. He doesn't change theo all he did is change variance.
ontariodealer
ontariodealer
  • Threads: 7
  • Posts: 999
Joined: Aug 5, 2013
January 17th, 2014 at 7:27:10 PM permalink
Quote: AxiomOfChoice

Any idea how many rolls to get to $800? Not that it matters, but I am curious to see how unlikely of a scenario getting to $800 twice in a row without winning is?



I don't count the rolls but he was there 4 to 5 hours, the second day all by himself.
get second you pig
  • Jump to: