DrOakland
DrOakland
  • Threads: 3
  • Posts: 12
Joined: Dec 14, 2011
Thanked by
acesidesmoothgrh
November 29th, 2025 at 1:51:36 PM permalink
This thread should take some down a memory lane. Bear with me...

Back in the day, Vegas World offered "vacation packages". Among other things, these included "table action chips" which were the core value of the package. These chips were good for one even money play, and were then removed, win or lose. Basically that meant the chips were worth about half their face value.

The challenge was to determine the most profitable way to play out these chips. As Blackjack Forum informed us, the blackjack at Vegas World was "Weird, Not Good!" A main problem was that table action chip bettors were only paid even money on blackjacks, which would give the house about a 3% edge... not good, indeed. But Vegas World was the original home of Double Exposure, and according to Stanford Wong the house edge there was much better. I used to sit at the table with a photocopy of Wong's basic strategy chart... no one seemed to mind. And on Double Exposure, blackjacks paid even money anyway, so table action chips were not being penalized. But it got better...

Back then I met an Asian card counter, who pointed out that table action chips had a big advantage in play over real chips. When doubling down on table action, you were allowed to put up real casino chips to complete the double. This effectively tripled the value of your bet. I figured that should wipe out the house advantage completely, maybe pushing it to the player's side by 1% or more.

This advantage was almost enough to make me consider offering to buy table action from strangers (but not quite). Turned out my favorite play was to "triple down" on a blackjack against a dealer stiff. Wong's basic strategy for Double Exposure did recommend doubling on soft 20 versus dealer 13 thru 16, though not on a blackjack. I thought the extra value of a triple down made it the right play. In any case, it often worked nicely for me, and I enjoyed the ruckus it would cause when the dealer would call out, "Doubling on blackjack!".

Comments? And I'm curious, any other old timers remember doing this kind of thing?
Last edited by: DrOakland on Nov 29, 2025
billryan
billryan
  • Threads: 297
  • Posts: 19888
Joined: Nov 2, 2009
November 29th, 2025 at 5:51:25 PM permalink
I read about the Vegas World Vacation packages, but never participated. By the time I made my first pilgrimage, the Strat was already open.
I appreciate stories like that. Thanks.
The older I get, the better I recall things that never happened
aceside
aceside
  • Threads: 2
  • Posts: 849
Joined: May 14, 2021
November 29th, 2025 at 7:33:30 PM permalink
I’m experienced in these actions. There are a few tricks there. Basically, you want to use these chips when you are more likely to lose and when you are more likely to win a higher odds.
ChumpChange
ChumpChange
  • Threads: 168
  • Posts: 5745
Joined: Jun 15, 2018
November 30th, 2025 at 2:46:25 AM permalink
Looks similar to Match Plays. I've tried Match Plays on Black Jack (some casinos don't allow them on Spanish 21, some do), and the problem is when it comes to splitting or doubling down at a higher denomination, I may need up to 6-7 more green chips to cover all the possible bets for one hand with one or two $25 MPs. If I don't have 8 green chips lying around in my pocket including the MPs, I'm just way over-betting. I prefer to put the MP on the Pass Line at the Craps table, or on Red or Black on the Roulette table.
aceside
aceside
  • Threads: 2
  • Posts: 849
Joined: May 14, 2021
November 30th, 2025 at 5:31:07 AM permalink
Quote OP “Turned out my favorite play was to "triple down" on a blackjack against a dealer stiff.”

I like this part, but I’ve never made this play myself. Firstly, the casino rules have that player is paid with 3:2 immediately upon a player Natural, so no hit card is allowed for player anymore in this situation . Secondly, just assume that player is allowed to triple down and is paid even money after tripling, is it correct to triple upon a dealer upcard of 4, 5, or 6? Can somebody calculate this part?
DrOakland
DrOakland
  • Threads: 3
  • Posts: 12
Joined: Dec 14, 2011
November 30th, 2025 at 9:15:46 AM permalink
Quote: aceside

I’m experienced in these actions. There are a few tricks there. Basically, you want to use these chips when you are more likely to lose and when you are more likely to win a higher odds.
link to original post



Yes, that would be good if you could get it. But Vegas World always required these chips be used for even money bets only.
DrOakland
DrOakland
  • Threads: 3
  • Posts: 12
Joined: Dec 14, 2011
November 30th, 2025 at 9:30:37 AM permalink
Quote: aceside


I like this part, but I’ve never made this play myself. Firstly, the casino rules have that player is paid with 3:2 immediately upon a player Natural, so no hit card is allowed for player anymore in this situation .
link to original post



I was making the triple down play only at the Double Exposure game, which paid only even money for a blackjack. Getting 3:2 immediately would likely make the triple down play dubious, even if allowed.
Last edited by: DrOakland on Nov 30, 2025
aceside
aceside
  • Threads: 2
  • Posts: 849
Joined: May 14, 2021
November 30th, 2025 at 1:15:17 PM permalink
In the blackjack game I play, a player natural pays 3:2 on promotional chips. In this situation, what is the strategy for doubling down with money chips on a player natural? Another thing, if player is allowed to triple down, then player will triple a lot more aggressively, like triple these borderline hands: 9vs2, 9vs7, 9vs8, 8vs6, 8vs5, and 7vs6.

I thought about this part again, so the triple EV is just 1.5 times of the double EV.
The triple EV of a player natural is just 1.5 time of the double EV of a player hard 11vs any dealer upcard. Based on this calculation, player should not triple a natural under any circumstances.

Is this right?
Last edited by: aceside on Nov 30, 2025
DrOakland
DrOakland
  • Threads: 3
  • Posts: 12
Joined: Dec 14, 2011
November 30th, 2025 at 6:25:45 PM permalink
Again, in Double Exposure the natural pays only even money. Trying to improve on that makes sense, especially against a dealer stiff. It's not 9vs2, it would be 9vs12, 13, etc.
aceside
aceside
  • Threads: 2
  • Posts: 849
Joined: May 14, 2021
November 30th, 2025 at 7:27:25 PM permalink
Double Exposure probably is a good old days history. I’ve never seen it anywhere. I just looked up Wizard’s EV components and found tripling down will bring up player’s EV by +1.64%. This is significant for regular blackjack games.
Last edited by: aceside on Nov 30, 2025
AutomaticMonkey
AutomaticMonkey
  • Threads: 20
  • Posts: 1281
Joined: Sep 30, 2024
Thanked by
DrOakland
November 30th, 2025 at 8:07:12 PM permalink
Quote: aceside

Double Exposure probably is a good old days history. I’ve never seen it anywhere. I just looked up Wizard’s EV components and found tripling down will bring up player’s EV by +1.64%. This is significant for regular blackjack games.
link to original post



The last time I played Double Exposure was well over 10 years ago, at the Tropicana in AC where they had a lot of odd and one-off games for a long time.

Funniest thing though- they had the table right next to a table of Multi-Action Blackjack, which is much like regular blackjack except you are playing multiple hands. And the dealer went from the DE table to the MA table and started dealing the MA game with the dealer's cards face up!

I had a lot of fun that day, until a pit boss came running over waving his arms and screaming!
billryan
billryan
  • Threads: 297
  • Posts: 19888
Joined: Nov 2, 2009
December 1st, 2025 at 8:26:47 AM permalink
I had a similar experience in Laughlin, twice in the same weekend. A relief dealer joined a non-standard BJ game and dealt about a half dozen hands before realizing it. It could have been lucrative, but I believe I won two extra hands
The older I get, the better I recall things that never happened
DrOakland
DrOakland
  • Threads: 3
  • Posts: 12
Joined: Dec 14, 2011
December 2nd, 2025 at 5:52:19 AM permalink
Thanks for the replies. Some may be wondering why I'm bringing this up 30 years later.

I wrote an article back then, "A Requiem for Vegas World" just after the place had closed. It was partially published in the Las Vegas Advisor. I happened to find it again on my old computer.

Guess I was hoping Michael Shackleford might see my post here, and comment about my triple down strategy for Double Exposure. Does he still read these threads?
billryan
billryan
  • Threads: 297
  • Posts: 19888
Joined: Nov 2, 2009
December 2nd, 2025 at 6:52:49 AM permalink
He drops by occasionally, often to suspend someone. You might pm him.
The older I get, the better I recall things that never happened
Hunterhill
Hunterhill
  • Threads: 54
  • Posts: 2284
Joined: Aug 1, 2011
December 2nd, 2025 at 8:57:26 AM permalink
Quote: DrOakland

Thanks for the replies. Some may be wondering why I'm bringing this up 30 years later.

I wrote an article back then, "A Requiem for Vegas World" just after the place had closed. It was partially published in the Las Vegas Advisor. I happened to find it again on my old computer.

Guess I was hoping Michael Shackleford might see my post here, and comment about my triple down strategy for Double Exposure. Does he still read these threads?
link to original post

I think I remember seeing your name Dr Oakland. Did you post on bj21 or in blackjack forum?
Happy days are here again
DrOakland
DrOakland
  • Threads: 3
  • Posts: 12
Joined: Dec 14, 2011
December 2nd, 2025 at 9:32:21 AM permalink
Quote: Hunterhill

think I remember seeing your name Dr Oakland. Did you post on bj21 or in blackjack forum?



Yes I posted in Blackjack Forum back in the 90s and did the Reno/Tahoe Insider for a few issues. I met Bishop Snyder when he lived in Oakland.
aceside
aceside
  • Threads: 2
  • Posts: 849
Joined: May 14, 2021
December 2nd, 2025 at 9:59:39 AM permalink
Apparently you have shifted your interest off blackjack, because you rarely posted here or elsewhere. What new interests have you found?
DrOakland
DrOakland
  • Threads: 3
  • Posts: 12
Joined: Dec 14, 2011
Thanked by
aceside
December 2nd, 2025 at 10:12:59 AM permalink
Quote: aceside

Apparently you have shifted your interest off blackjack, because you rarely posted here or elsewhere. What new interests have you found?
link to original post



I was into poker for awhile, then bonus hunting in the online casinos back when that was hot. Mostly retired now..
Hunterhill
Hunterhill
  • Threads: 54
  • Posts: 2284
Joined: Aug 1, 2011
December 2nd, 2025 at 8:23:23 PM permalink
Quote: DrOakland

Quote: Hunterhill

think I remember seeing your name Dr Oakland. Did you post on bj21 or in blackjack forum?



Yes I posted in Blackjack Forum back in the 90s and did the Reno/Tahoe Insider for a few issues. I met Bishop Snyder when he lived in Oakland.
link to original post


Good to see you posting again. I met Arnold a few times he was a really nice guy.
Happy days are here again
  • Jump to: