Best blackjack bonuses

railer
railer
railer
  • Threads: 11
  • Posts: 49
Joined: Mar 2, 2012
February 6th, 2019 at 10:24:15 AM permalink
I assume that the Wizard's composite dependent strategy tables only include the first hand dealt. So, would there be an added edge to playing composite strategy after splits as well?
BigJer
BigJer
BigJer
  • Threads: 46
  • Posts: 306
Joined: Sep 16, 2012
February 8th, 2019 at 9:39:25 AM permalink
Quote: railer

I assume that the Wizard's composite dependent strategy tables only include the first hand dealt. So, would there be an added edge to playing composite strategy after splits as well?



It seems like it would be the same as with splits, doubles and so forth. But other might know more.
The Terror of Casinos.
jackmagic777
jackmagic777
jackmagic777
  • Threads: 1
  • Posts: 161
Joined: Jan 11, 2019
February 8th, 2019 at 10:49:59 AM permalink
Unfortunately i have been unable to find a strategy chart that compensates for the idiot at 3rd base taking the dealer's break card. SIGH
BigJer
BigJer
BigJer
  • Threads: 46
  • Posts: 306
Joined: Sep 16, 2012
February 8th, 2019 at 10:51:28 AM permalink
Quote: jackmagic777

Unfortunately i have been unable to find a strategy chart that compensates for the idiot at 3rd base taking the dealer's break card. SIGH



Tell me you're kidding.............. Please?
The Terror of Casinos.
Wizard
Administrator
Wizard 
Wizard
  • Threads: 1519
  • Posts: 27053
Joined: Oct 14, 2009
February 8th, 2019 at 5:04:11 PM permalink
Quote: railer

I assume that the Wizard's composite dependent strategy tables only include the first hand dealt. So, would there be an added edge to playing composite strategy after splits as well?



That's correct.
"For with much wisdom comes much sorrow." -- Ecclesiastes 1:18 (NIV)
aceofspades
aceofspades
aceofspades
  • Threads: 366
  • Posts: 6506
Joined: Apr 4, 2012
February 8th, 2019 at 5:59:32 PM permalink
I have always used the following composite based strategy:

Hit multi-card 16 v dealer 10 and Ace
Hit 10,2 v dealer 4


Thoughts...?
BigJer
BigJer
BigJer
  • Threads: 46
  • Posts: 306
Joined: Sep 16, 2012
February 24th, 2019 at 8:57:50 AM permalink
Quote: aceofspades

I have always used the following composite based strategy:

Hit multi-card 16 v dealer 10 and Ace
Hit 10,2 v dealer 4


Thoughts...?



The first one you would stand on a multi-card 16 vs. 10. The second, I'm not sure if it's always hit a 10, 2 vs. 4, depending on the count, but yes, you can go with the hit.
The Terror of Casinos.
aceofspades
aceofspades
aceofspades
  • Threads: 366
  • Posts: 6506
Joined: Apr 4, 2012
February 24th, 2019 at 9:14:57 AM permalink
Quote: BigJer

The first one you would stand on a multi-card 16 vs. 10. The second, I'm not sure if it's always hit a 10, 2 vs. 4, depending on the count, but yes, you can go with the hit.



Yes you are right - I tried going back to edit it but the edit function is not available
unJon
unJon
unJon
  • Threads: 16
  • Posts: 4768
Joined: Jul 1, 2018
February 24th, 2019 at 3:08:13 PM permalink
Quote: aceofspades

Yes you are right - I tried going back to edit it but the edit function is not available



I think the composite dependent rule is hit 16 into a T or A unless your hand contains a 4 or 5.
The race is not always to the swift, nor the battle to the strong; but that is the way to bet.
RSS Feed
  • Jump to: