railer
railer
Joined: Mar 2, 2012
  • Threads: 8
  • Posts: 17
February 6th, 2019 at 10:24:15 AM permalink
I assume that the Wizard's composite dependent strategy tables only include the first hand dealt. So, would there be an added edge to playing composite strategy after splits as well?
BigJer
BigJer
Joined: Sep 16, 2012
  • Threads: 46
  • Posts: 306
February 8th, 2019 at 9:39:25 AM permalink
Quote: railer

I assume that the Wizard's composite dependent strategy tables only include the first hand dealt. So, would there be an added edge to playing composite strategy after splits as well?



It seems like it would be the same as with splits, doubles and so forth. But other might know more.
The Terror of Casinos.
jackmagic777
jackmagic777
Joined: Jan 11, 2019
  • Threads: 1
  • Posts: 161
February 8th, 2019 at 10:49:59 AM permalink
Unfortunately i have been unable to find a strategy chart that compensates for the idiot at 3rd base taking the dealer's break card. SIGH
BigJer
BigJer
Joined: Sep 16, 2012
  • Threads: 46
  • Posts: 306
February 8th, 2019 at 10:51:28 AM permalink
Quote: jackmagic777

Unfortunately i have been unable to find a strategy chart that compensates for the idiot at 3rd base taking the dealer's break card. SIGH



Tell me you're kidding.............. Please?
The Terror of Casinos.
Wizard
Administrator
Wizard
Joined: Oct 14, 2009
  • Threads: 1332
  • Posts: 21942
February 8th, 2019 at 5:04:11 PM permalink
Quote: railer

I assume that the Wizard's composite dependent strategy tables only include the first hand dealt. So, would there be an added edge to playing composite strategy after splits as well?



That's correct.
It's not whether you win or lose; it's whether or not you had a good bet.
aceofspades
aceofspades
Joined: Apr 4, 2012
  • Threads: 366
  • Posts: 6506
February 8th, 2019 at 5:59:32 PM permalink
I have always used the following composite based strategy:

Hit multi-card 16 v dealer 10 and Ace
Hit 10,2 v dealer 4


Thoughts...?
BigJer
BigJer
Joined: Sep 16, 2012
  • Threads: 46
  • Posts: 306
February 24th, 2019 at 8:57:50 AM permalink
Quote: aceofspades

I have always used the following composite based strategy:

Hit multi-card 16 v dealer 10 and Ace
Hit 10,2 v dealer 4


Thoughts...?



The first one you would stand on a multi-card 16 vs. 10. The second, I'm not sure if it's always hit a 10, 2 vs. 4, depending on the count, but yes, you can go with the hit.
The Terror of Casinos.
aceofspades
aceofspades
Joined: Apr 4, 2012
  • Threads: 366
  • Posts: 6506
February 24th, 2019 at 9:14:57 AM permalink
Quote: BigJer

The first one you would stand on a multi-card 16 vs. 10. The second, I'm not sure if it's always hit a 10, 2 vs. 4, depending on the count, but yes, you can go with the hit.



Yes you are right - I tried going back to edit it but the edit function is not available
unJon
unJon
Joined: Jul 1, 2018
  • Threads: 13
  • Posts: 1814
February 24th, 2019 at 3:08:13 PM permalink
Quote: aceofspades

Yes you are right - I tried going back to edit it but the edit function is not available



I think the composite dependent rule is hit 16 into a T or A unless your hand contains a 4 or 5.
The race is not always to the swift, nor the battle to the strong; but that is the way to bet.

  • Jump to: