Quote: RomesOf people who call themselves card counters, yes, sadly I do believe that. I've taught dozens of counters, and maybe one of them had a "winning game" albeit rough understandings of RoR/Kelly/etc. And of those people I've taught most came from one forums or another where they'd already been exposed to these concepts, let alone the random friend/family/etc... And I've run in to other "counters" at the tables and in convo they show they don't know these other things at allllllll.
I seriously think the casino should do this: You're allowed to card count if you spread 1-100. 99.9999999999% of people won't have ANY concept or RoR/Kelly and they will go broke even if they count PERFECTLY and play PERFECT deviations just because they don't understand those core concepts. Never mind that the true professionals (1% of 1%) would have a field day... the others would lose more than they would make due to the shier number of losing counters.
How would that benefit the casino? RoR/Kelly doesn't matter for their bottom line, only HE does, and with a 1-100 spread it's pretty huge. Sure many will go broke and many will do pretty damn well... Am I missing something? The only advantage this would have is in killing a bunch of counters who are below the SD, hunger games style, but it'd cost a lot for the casino. Or if you mean the average HE of people who believe they are counters and use spreads is -EV (or at least the group who doesn't know RoR/Kelly and will spread to 100 overbetting their bankroll), then yeah the increase in average bet would bring more money, but although I agree the advanced concepts are not commonly applied, like bankroll management and perfect deviations, I don't think it is that hard to have a +EV game...