April 10th, 2013 at 6:02:36 AM
                    permalink
                
Wiz,
On the Woodds site, there are various appendices for long-term returns based on plays.
I might be wrong, or missing something, and apologies if this has been covered elsewhere (I have trawled through a fair amount of content though, and found nothing so far), but I was expecting the probability column in the tables to add up to 1, however the ones I've looked at add only to ~0.952.
In addition, I was expecting the expected rtn to be the probability x optimal decision, however (likely because the proby doesn't add to 1), I'm not getting this. Can you advise?
See:
for an example.
thanks,
Hay
On the Woodds site, there are various appendices for long-term returns based on plays.
I might be wrong, or missing something, and apologies if this has been covered elsewhere (I have trawled through a fair amount of content though, and found nothing so far), but I was expecting the probability column in the tables to add up to 1, however the ones I've looked at add only to ~0.952.
In addition, I was expecting the expected rtn to be the probability x optimal decision, however (likely because the proby doesn't add to 1), I'm not getting this. Can you advise?
See:
for an example.
thanks,
Hay
                    April 10th, 2013 at 6:12:00 AM
                    permalink
                
The total probability doesn't add up to one because the player cannot hit, stand, double, etc. when the dealer has blackjack, which has a probability of 0.0474513 in an 8 deck game.  So the probabilities in App. 9 should add up to ~0.9525
                    April 10th, 2013 at 6:24:12 AM
                    permalink
                
Quote: tringlomaneThe total probability doesn't add up to one because the player cannot hit, stand, double, etc. when the dealer has blackjack, which has a probability of 0.0474513 in an 8 deck game.
This is absolutely correct.
"For with much wisdom comes much sorrow."  -- Ecclesiastes 1:18 (NIV)
 
                    April 24th, 2013 at 5:28:13 PM
                    permalink
                
I have been told by others that if the most correct play is made (with all of the possible hands) against an ace up-card the BJ Appendix 9 chart shows that a player is expected to win only one time out of three.  That would always make the player a 33.33% underdog.  Is this correct.  Thank you.
                    April 24th, 2013 at 10:42:47 PM
                    permalink
                
Quote: boblueredI have been told by others that if the most correct play is made (with all of the possible hands) against an ace up-card ..
Are you asking what the probability is after the dealer has checked for blackjack or before? Appendix 9 is calculated after the dealer has checked for blackjack and it is NOT a blackjack.
                    April 26th, 2013 at 8:11:07 PM
                    permalink
                
I saw in the info provided that it was after BJ check.  Now my question......Does Appendiz 9 show that a player has, on average, only has one chance out of three to win?
                    April 26th, 2013 at 9:13:33 PM
                    permalink
                
deleted
DUHHIIIIIIIII HEARD THAT!
 

 
                         
                                                             
                                                             
                                                             
                                                             
                                                             
                                                             
  
 