Best blackjack bonuses

100xOdds
100xOdds
100xOdds
  • Threads: 661
  • Posts: 4540
Joined: Feb 5, 2012
February 26th, 2013 at 6:42:21 PM permalink
With all this modern tech in casinos, it could be all automated.

the camera does the count, and when it's hugely unfavorable the computer signals the pit boss who in turn tells the blackjack dealer to shuffle.

So why isnt this done?

and dont say noone will go to that casino to play once news is leaked.
look at 6:5 blackjack and how popular it is...
Craps is paradise (Pair of dice). Lets hear it for the SpeedCount Mathletes :)
Ibeatyouraces
Ibeatyouraces
Ibeatyouraces
  • Threads: 68
  • Posts: 11933
Joined: Jan 12, 2010
February 26th, 2013 at 6:51:09 PM permalink
deleted
DUHHIIIIIIIII HEARD THAT!
bigfoot66
bigfoot66
bigfoot66
  • Threads: 54
  • Posts: 1582
Joined: Feb 5, 2010
February 26th, 2013 at 7:02:47 PM permalink
I think the main reason is probably that it smells like cheating to the casual casino patron and would be a major turn off to even most squares. People are far more likely to tolerate CSM's which would have a similar effect on the game as what you propose.
Vote for Nobody 2020!
21Revolution
21Revolution
21Revolution
  • Threads: 8
  • Posts: 71
Joined: Dec 27, 2012
February 26th, 2013 at 7:04:41 PM permalink
I think stopping play would really make people wonder, and upset if they were on a run. To your point, if they need to keep things favorable, they can make rule adjustments like 6:5. But at least then it doesn't change on you mid-shoe.
fulkgl
fulkgl
fulkgl
  • Threads: 2
  • Posts: 20
Joined: Apr 24, 2011
February 26th, 2013 at 7:30:56 PM permalink
I have only first hand witnessed this behavior once. El Cortez, about 8 years ago on a $5 single deck table. Nobody was betting more that $25. An oriental pit woman was standing beside the table. After every hand the dealer gave her a glance. Every time the shoe went positive, she had the dealer shuffle up. Even if that was only after one hand. If the deck was negative she had the dealer keep dealing deep into the deck.
hagen49
hagen49
hagen49
  • Threads: 9
  • Posts: 43
Joined: Feb 24, 2013
February 26th, 2013 at 9:46:09 PM permalink
At that point I would walk away. The only thing you could even do to hope for help is to play one hand right after the shuffle, and then walk away. far far away. like to the casino next door
DAMN YOU 2ND 12!!!
sunrise089
sunrise089
sunrise089
  • Threads: 6
  • Posts: 209
Joined: Jul 12, 2010
February 26th, 2013 at 9:56:24 PM permalink
@the OP - when players stand on hard 9s and hit hard 19s the casino needs to be careful not to slow the game down, which early shuffling does substantially.
onenickelmiracle
onenickelmiracle
onenickelmiracle
  • Threads: 212
  • Posts: 8277
Joined: Jan 26, 2012
February 27th, 2013 at 12:55:41 AM permalink
Shuffling no matter the reason is a good way to get people to quit for not wanting to wait, so I'm not sure it is a good play for the casino if people leave.
I am a robot.
1BB
1BB
1BB
  • Threads: 18
  • Posts: 5339
Joined: Oct 10, 2011
February 27th, 2013 at 3:20:43 AM permalink
Quote: 100xOdds

With all this modern tech in casinos, it could be all automated.

the camera does the count, and when it's hugely unfavorable the computer signals the pit boss who in turn tells the blackjack dealer to shuffle.

So why isnt this done?

and dont say noone will go to that casino to play once news is leaked.
look at 6:5 blackjack and how popular it is...



Decreasing hands per hour by shuffling early reduces profits faster than a counter who may or may not win no matter how positive the shoe is. Counters can always be dealt with individually. I have been shuffled up on and half shoed many times in Atlantic City where they can't ban counters. Even they will try flat betting before sacrificing hands per hour.
Many people, especially ignorant people, want to punish you for speaking the truth. - Mahatma Ghandi
Kellynbnf
Kellynbnf
Kellynbnf
  • Threads: 15
  • Posts: 199
Joined: May 5, 2010
February 27th, 2013 at 9:27:04 AM permalink
If you search the Internet for "preferential shuffling" you'll learn that the practice you mentioned does have some history. The problem is that it's like removing good cards from the deck or shoe; it hurts the odds of everyone who plays (and not just counters), which makes it a borderline case of cheating on the part of the casino.
Ibeatyouraces
Ibeatyouraces
Ibeatyouraces
  • Threads: 68
  • Posts: 11933
Joined: Jan 12, 2010
February 27th, 2013 at 10:19:35 AM permalink
deleted
DUHHIIIIIIIII HEARD THAT!
AcesAndEights
AcesAndEights
AcesAndEights
  • Threads: 67
  • Posts: 4300
Joined: Jan 5, 2012
February 27th, 2013 at 10:21:13 AM permalink
Quote: Kellynbnf

If you search the Internet for "preferential shuffling" you'll learn that the practice you mentioned does have some history. The problem is that it's like removing good cards from the deck or shoe; it hurts the odds of everyone who plays (and not just counters), which makes it a borderline case of cheating on the part of the casino.


Wasn't there a lawsuit about this practice?
"So drink gamble eat f***, because one day you will be dust." -ontariodealer
FleaStiff
FleaStiff
FleaStiff
  • Threads: 265
  • Posts: 14484
Joined: Oct 19, 2009
February 27th, 2013 at 12:35:40 PM permalink
I seem to recall some administrative action taken against the use of a device then marketed as "Smart Table" which had a light that indicated the dealer should shuffle. It was basically a table that automatically counted being used in a casino that threw out players who did the same thing.
MathExtremist
MathExtremist
MathExtremist
  • Threads: 88
  • Posts: 6526
Joined: Aug 31, 2010
February 27th, 2013 at 12:57:41 PM permalink
Quote: FleaStiff

I seem to recall some administrative action taken against the use of a device then marketed as "Smart Table" which had a light that indicated the dealer should shuffle. It was basically a table that automatically counted being used in a casino that threw out players who did the same thing.


This system doesn't actually recommend that the dealer shuffle, though I suppose it could -- but it does tell the pit when the count goes positive so they can watch for any players who increase their bets:
http://www.casinoenterprisemanagement.com/newswire/econnect-showcase-blackjack-card-counting-technology-world-game-protection
"In my own case, when it seemed to me after a long illness that death was close at hand, I found no little solace in playing constantly at dice." -- Girolamo Cardano, 1563
Gabes22
Gabes22
Gabes22
  • Threads: 15
  • Posts: 1427
Joined: Jul 19, 2011
February 27th, 2013 at 1:00:56 PM permalink
Quote: MathExtremist

This system doesn't actually recommend that the dealer shuffle, though I suppose it could -- but it does tell the pit when the count goes positive so they can watch for any players who increase their bets:
http://www.casinoenterprisemanagement.com/newswire/econnect-showcase-blackjack-card-counting-technology-world-game-protection


That might be the intended purpose of the inventor and developer of the product, but I would suggest that a casino owning it would probably use that information to no longer deal hands with a deck that is stacked against the house. Law of unintended consequences I suppose.
A flute with no holes is not a flute, a donut with no holes is a danish
1BB
1BB
1BB
  • Threads: 18
  • Posts: 5339
Joined: Oct 10, 2011
February 27th, 2013 at 1:19:59 PM permalink
Quote: bigfoot66

I think the main reason is probably that it smells like cheating to the casual casino patron and would be a major turn off to even most squares. People are far more likely to tolerate CSM's which would have a similar effect on the game as what you propose.



Our own Wizard has concluded that the house edge is slightly lower with CSMs. That is negated by the increase in hands per hour.
Many people, especially ignorant people, want to punish you for speaking the truth. - Mahatma Ghandi
RSS Feed
  • Jump to: