FakeIt
FakeIt
  • Threads: 2
  • Posts: 2
Joined: Oct 27, 2012
November 13th, 2012 at 3:25:17 PM permalink
So I play at a 6 Deck, S17, No RSA, DAS, split up to 3 hands and no surrender. I was looking at the Wizard's appendices, and I saw that you're supposed to stand with a 3+ card 16 as well as a 4+ card soft 18. I was also digging around in the appendices and saw that you only surrender a 15 if it's composed of 10+5 or 9+6 but not on an 8+7. Can anyone tell me the +/- EV or these plays? They're probably negligible, but I'm really interested in why it is so. I'm guessing for the 10+5 and 9+6 that in the hand, you already possess one of the cards that you need to improve your hand, so it makes it a less valuable play.

Thoughts?
MangoJ
MangoJ
  • Threads: 10
  • Posts: 905
Joined: Mar 12, 2011
November 13th, 2012 at 3:40:17 PM permalink
Yes thats the basic idea of the card removal from your hand. As the game is 6 deck however, the change in EV must be pretty small.
BigJer
BigJer
  • Threads: 46
  • Posts: 306
Joined: Sep 16, 2012
November 13th, 2012 at 3:43:40 PM permalink
My feeling on it is it makes minimal difference. But now that you know it use it.
The Terror of Casinos.
BigJer
BigJer
  • Threads: 46
  • Posts: 306
Joined: Sep 16, 2012
November 13th, 2012 at 4:49:44 PM permalink
BTW is that a 3 card 16 against any card? I couldn't find the info in the appendices.
The Terror of Casinos.
AxiomOfChoice
AxiomOfChoice
  • Threads: 32
  • Posts: 5761
Joined: Sep 12, 2012
November 13th, 2012 at 5:19:53 PM permalink
Quote: FakeIt

So I play at a 6 Deck, S17, No RSA, DAS, split up to 3 hands and no surrender. I was looking at the Wizard's appendices, and I saw that you're supposed to stand with a 3+ card 16 as well as a 4+ card soft 18. I was also digging around in the appendices and saw that you only surrender a 15 if it's composed of 10+5 or 9+6 but not on an 8+7. Can anyone tell me the +/- EV or these plays? They're probably negligible, but I'm really interested in why it is so. I'm guessing for the 10+5 and 9+6 that in the hand, you already possess one of the cards that you need to improve your hand, so it makes it a less valuable play.

Thoughts?



You are right, it's fairly negligible.

I think that the reasons for it are, you're basically card counting those card only. a 3-card 16 vs a 10 is a hit, but the index is 0 (meaning that if the count is 0 or above you should stand). In a 3-card 16 vs a 10, those 4 cards have a count of 0 or above, so, if you're not counting the other cards, standing does slightly better than hitting. If you are counting all the other cards, then stand on 0 or + counts, and hit on - counts.

Even if you're not counting, you could at least look at the cards that the other players have exposed for that hand and make an informed decision accordingly.
Ibeatyouraces
Ibeatyouraces
  • Threads: 68
  • Posts: 11933
Joined: Jan 12, 2010
November 13th, 2012 at 7:28:36 PM permalink
deleted
DUHHIIIIIIIII HEARD THAT!
BigJer
BigJer
  • Threads: 46
  • Posts: 306
Joined: Sep 16, 2012
November 13th, 2012 at 7:38:54 PM permalink
Quote: Ibeatyouraces

Stand 3+ card 16 vs 10 and stand 4+ card soft 18 vs A.



Thank you.
The Terror of Casinos.
Ibeatyouraces
Ibeatyouraces
  • Threads: 68
  • Posts: 11933
Joined: Jan 12, 2010
November 13th, 2012 at 7:52:14 PM permalink
deleted
DUHHIIIIIIIII HEARD THAT!
  • Jump to: