blaxius
blaxius
Joined: May 2, 2012
  • Threads: 1
  • Posts: 38
May 9th, 2012 at 1:23:13 PM permalink
Quote: thecesspit

Try it anyways, as you should find it makes zero difference, and coding a "wait until" routine shouldn't be hard, especially as all you'll need is to add an "OR" statement to stop waiting after time/spin X.

I am assuming your RNG is working as expected. I've fallen into traps before with bad seeding of the RNG so multiple runs ended up looking the same.



You are right, I'll code it. And actually, I'm using a software that reseeds automatically every new "session" I start, so I should not worry about that.
blaxius
blaxius
Joined: May 2, 2012
  • Threads: 1
  • Posts: 38
May 27th, 2012 at 8:16:28 PM permalink
Guys, I have been waiting for an answer from Bluejay, buy he did not answer, so I will tell you one of my theories and I would like you to tell me what you think about it:

One of my original ideas was betting only on one number. The chances for that number to show up is 1/37. But, having a bankroll of 5000 and making the minimum bet to cover the previous loses, you could bet 150 times to the same number. having a minimum winning. The chances of a number not showing up after 150 times is {1-((36/(36+1))^H150)}, about 98,3133858935548%. As you win, your bankroll increases and you can bet more than 150 times to the same number, up to 278 times (any further would be betting more than $5000, which cannot be done in this challenge).

So, if I were allowed to wait as many spins as wanted, then I would wait until any number does not show up after X times, which would greatly reduce that 98,3133858935548%. And here I am talking about the chances of seeing an event happen in X spins. After each win, I would increase the spins in which any number does not show up, and I would be able to increase the number of times I can bet to the same number, making the chances of losing smaller.

I have not tried this 100 times as I usually do because this is a lot longer, but I did try it a few times and I have been successful.

Do you understand my idea? If you do, how incorrect is it?

Thanks guys!
treetopbuddy
treetopbuddy
Joined: Jan 12, 2013
  • Threads: 34
  • Posts: 1739
February 21st, 2013 at 3:38:57 PM permalink
Quote: buzzpaff

" I wonder what games the casinos will use as replacements for roulette now that it has been beaten? "

That is exactly why I always limit my daily winning sessions to $10,000 or less. However, due to poor health, I am retiring.
as a special favor to forum members I will sell my system for only $49.47. PM me for details and YES I do accept PayPal.

will you take personal check?
Each day is better than the next
Lexinger
Lexinger
Joined: Feb 21, 2013
  • Threads: 0
  • Posts: 47
February 21st, 2013 at 4:53:48 PM permalink
Quote: rainman

What is this 30k challenge?


Go to a casino near you, and walk out with a few millions. That's the real world challenge.
Those who can, do; those who can't, teach. But those who confuse the two... they wind up on the internet.

  • Jump to: