The Adventures of MDawg

Mdawg you say it the best amigo!

muy bien

you tell them bring the money or callate!

Quote: MDawg

He's just talking nonsense. I'm nowhere near that age. I am sure I am younger than DarkO. And while we are at it, based on his 1/3 of 75 age for his gf, my wife is just a tad younger than his gf.

He needs to catch the bus now, so he probably mistyped...twice, while stumbling up the bus steps. ☺️

He's doing well though if he is 50 and his gf is 25, I am not putting him down except for his nonsense talk about "75."

I cant find it so perhaps I got confused with another poster saying they were 75.

MDawg claims he and his wife were hoping his markers would go away from Y2K issues 20 years ago so MDawg is not more than a few years younger than me at best if that.

https://wizardofvegas.com/forum/off-topic/off-topic/18435-miscellaneous-discussion-thread/1250/#post752180

Quote: MDawg

Here is the nature of the challenge with Michael99000 which he knows EXACTLY what the wager is but he just keeps talking smack to try and defuse that he whiffed on it. Essentially, I handed him a pussy ticket and he walked.

He will need to come and deposit $50K at the cage. He may play whatever he wants to play BJ roulette craps Baccarat I don't care. No sports betting tho. So may I play whatever I want to play, but it has to be play at the same casino. At the end of two weeks I will be in the plus and I will have won more than he. It is a simple challenge, there is no side bet.

I mean, this is the nature of what I am DOING right now! I am playing with $50K per property and I am leaving Las Vegas ahead at the end of each trip. So for me, it's just business as usual.

Obviously he will have to cover his expenses for those two weeks but if he is playing with $50K and he knows so much about comps as he claims with his repeated smart aleck posts, all his expenses will be covered by the casino.

But...I don't think he even has $50K to gamble with. Just a big mouth.

If I had claimed I was better at baccarat than you are, then your challenge would make sense. However, claiming to be better than someone at a game with a mathematical house edge, in which the results are completely determined by luck, makes no sense.

You claim to be a consistent lifetime baccarat winner , coming out ahead session after session, and you claim to do this by riding current bank/player streaks, and knowing what the upcoming hands will be based on “the flow of the cards”. This is the ONLY thing you have posted about that I challenge to be untrue. And every post or reply I’ve typed in any thread is completely related to just this claim.

Everything else you talk about I find to be uninteresting, unimpressive, and not unusual or noteworthy. I guess some people here are amazed by a photo of $4000 and a razor. I’m not. It’s actually amazing to me that someone with your gambling beliefs can have earned money in any aspect of life. But who knows, maybe you had a rich aunt.

If you’d like to make a wager regarding your claim to have methods to beat the house in baccarat , count me in.

Quote: MDawg

He will need to come and deposit $50K at the cage. He may play whatever he wants to play BJ roulette craps Baccarat I don't care. No sports betting tho. So may I play whatever I want to play, but it has to be play at the same casino. At the end of two weeks I will be in the plus and I will have won more than he.

Is there any minimum play required?

If he may play whatever he wants, does that mean he doesn't have to play anything, just watch you play and hope you lose so he can collect $50K from you?

Quote: darkoz

I cant find it so perhaps I got confused with another poster saying they were 75.

MDawg claims he and his wife were hoping his markers would go away from Y2K issues 20 years ago so MDawg is not more than a few years younger than me at best if that.

https://wizardofvegas.com/forum/off-topic/off-topic/18435-miscellaneous-discussion-thread/1250/#post752180

Making some basic assumptions that he wasn’t getting markers at 21 years old....and assuming he’s being honest when he says he is no where near 75...my guess is his age could be anywhere from 45 to 55. I’m leaning 50+.

A bit old to be playing these type of immature games, challenges, et al....but whatever.

He would probably be better served simply making it a daily diary instead of being so concerned about people believing or not believing.

Enjoy the content if you want. Nothing is getting proven or disproven here, imo....beyond the idea that baccarat cannot be played at +EV.

He could be a long term winner. Simulations have shown that in craps, based on the lowest house edge bets a small percentage of players could be overall net positive after a long playing career. Net positive....of course that could be as small as $1.

I had my first markers at 22. I was playing during a ski trip and the casino in Tahoe pulled me aside into their little VIP office, it was downstairs at that time, in Harrah's Tahoe, and next thing you know I had $5K lines all around Tahoe. That was the beginning.


This comment of Michael 99000 reminds me of low grade attorneys who seize upon an immaterial point in the moving papers to file their opposition. No, let's not talk about a video of a half million in watches let's point to a picture of a razor, to try and red herring the issue.

Obviously everything about me impresses you Michael99000 else why would you post so much about it. I occupy all your waking thoughts, it is your mission in life to comment on anything MDawg says. Thank you. Of course I am being facetious, but sadly, you are not. But, if I were you instead of spending time commenting on my posts, I'd figure out a way to come up with fifty grand, because I'd wager further that if you had to do it today to save your life, you couldn't, and you would die.

Quote: Mendoza

Mdawg you say it the best amigo!

muy bien

you tell them bring the money or callate!

Does it take someone who can barely speak English to say it best?

Ok, so if they were giving you markers at 22 you already had money at a young age. In one of your posts didnt you mention a rich uncle who could have flown you in his private jet?

I am the complete antithesis in that I grew up dirt poor and was even homeless for a few years before making a living as an AP.

BTW - if you are 43 or so years old, thats not that much younger than me. I just turned 51. Its not a huge age difference. You will be 51 before you know it, lol!

Oh okay right, yes my uncle had a plane. But that doesn't mean he was giving me money!

Quote: MDawg

Oh okay right, yes my uncle had a plane. But that doesn't mean he was giving me money!

Hmmm, thats not quite a denial

Quote: MDawg

Obviously everything about me impresses you Michael99000 else why would you post so much about it.

I don't think I have chimed in at all in this thread but this one comment tells me everything I need to know about MDawg.

Isn't there a rule against quoting only part of what someone says if it mischaracterizes the post? Or does DRich not know what the word facetious means?

Quote: DRich

I don't think I have chimed in at all in this thread but this one comment tells me everything I need to know about MDawg.

MDawg is the best thing to happen to this forum in months for some people... they can't get enough of him! Haha...

Quote: MDawg

We're number 1! We're number 1!
https://media.giphy.com/media/3s8UjFq4cIabXR9PD3/giphy.gif

Markers at 22?

Seems a bit early before even starting a career out of college making money.

Could be a Dan Bilzerian trust fund baby type situation.

No harm.

I understand that Bilzerian is more, supported by "backers" no? doesn't really have anything himself? Plus he didn't go to college and grad school and pass multiple professional licensing exams.

Anyway...I said I wouldn't today but I ended up caught up in this forum again. Gotta go meet my Vegas partner to work on closing this escrow.

GOOD LUCK TO ALL!

Quote: MDawg

I understand that Bilzerian is more, supported by "backers" no? doesn't really have anything himself? Plus he didn't go to college and grad school and pass multiple professional licensing exams.

Anyway...I said I wouldn't today but I ended up caught up in this forum again. Gotta go meet my Vegas partner to work on closing this escrow.

GOOD LUCK TO ALL!

Ok...so you didn't even start a career at 22. You went to grad school which adds at least another 2 years...more if law school. A professional career actually earning money would not have started until 25+.

Getting casino markers at 21-22 has all the indications of trust fund baby, family money...IOW's, not self earned.

No harm....just noting. It's quite possible you have had a long professional career in law or business. No question. Getting markers at 21-22 raises some questions.

Paul Bilzerian, a corporate raider, set up trust funds for both his sons. They all have admitted to that. His "backer" was Dad...and when I say "backer", I mean he gave them money. Nothing necessarily wrong with that....other than what is noted. Dad also went to jail over his business practices which raises a question about the money "earned".

Quote: coachbelly

I get the sense that there IS a question of whether or not he HAS won.

How's Boz's tense here? He's talking about the past, right?

Actually, this is not an example of past tense, coach. I haven't edited papers in awhile, so please forgive my indecision as to whether the Boz quote you used is:

1) Present continuous tense, which is used to describe an action going on, goes on and will go on, or
2) Present perfect continuous tense, which is used to describe an action started earlier and still going.

You're welcome.

Quote: MDawg

Hey so then Soopoo has millions in the bank too. But no one's giving him a hard time. Why? because he didn't spend a million of it on watches, or put double digits of it into the stock market? All I'm gambling with is fifty grand at a time, how is that so controversial?

Not controversial to be gambling that much. You know the controversy, if you want to call it that, is that the great majority here do not believe that you are winning at baccarat. My disbelief was that someone purports to have millions tied up in one stock play. Unless worth a hundred times that. Or really foolish.
I’ve been an anesthesiologist for 30 years. It would be more shocking if I wasn’t worth 7 figures. I think the only claim I would make here that others would doubt me on are my basketball shooting abilities. Personal bests... 67 free throws in a row. 25 college 3’s in a row. 11 NBA 3’s in a row. All after the age of 50.

Quote: SOOPOO

Not controversial to be gambling that much. You know the controversy, if you want to call it that, is that the great majority here do not believe that you are winning at baccarat. My disbelief was that someone purports to have millions tied up in one stock play. Unless worth a hundred times that. Or really foolish.
I’ve been an anesthesiologist for 30 years. It would be more shocking if I wasn’t worth 7 figures. I think the only claim I would make here that others would doubt me on are my basketball shooting abilities. Personal bests... 67 free throws in a row. 25 college 3’s in a row. 11 NBA 3’s in a row. All after the age of 50.

If I pay $50,000, can I come to buffalo and watch you shoot baskets.

Quote: SOOPOO

Not controversial to be gambling that much. You know the controversy, if you want to call it that, is that the great majority here do not believe that you are winning at baccarat. My disbelief was that someone purports to have millions tied up in one stock play. Unless worth a hundred times that. Or really foolish.
I’ve been an anesthesiologist for 30 years. It would be more shocking if I wasn’t worth 7 figures. I think the only claim I would make here that others would doubt me on are my basketball shooting abilities. Personal bests... 67 free throws in a row. 25 college 3’s in a row. 11 NBA 3’s in a row. All after the age of 50.

Sportswise, I have a gold medal in running.. to catch my bus

Wow, SOOPOO that's cookin'! I made 80-some free throws in a row a couple of times, but I can't even make an NBA three. And 25 consecutive college threes is awesome.

To the task at hand -- look, ladies and gentlemen, the math is the math. Baccarat, like blackjack, is a solved game. If people have accrued winnings at a negative game due to variance or God's blessing -- more power to them. Saying that one HAS WON is one thing. Saying that one will win going forward or that one can teach others is something else entirely.

Think about a lottery winner who might decide to entertain people with high roller pics and stories and slightly braggadocio narratives. No real math issues there. But if that same person were to introduce the "flow of numbers" as the reason they won the lottery, and suggested they would win going forward and could mentor others, then questions would arise. And doubts. And challenges.

Quote: redietz

please forgive my indecision as to whether the Boz quote you used is:

1) Present continuous tense, which is used to describe an action going on, goes on and will go on, or
2) Present perfect continuous tense, which is used to describe an action started earlier and still going.

You are forgiven. Here's the quote...

Quote: Boz

Everyone of us on here understands he isn’t beating the casinos and getting comped trip after trip.

I'm going with #2...present perfect continuous tense.

Boz is describing an action started earlier (beating the casinos and getting comped) and still going on.

Quote: redietz

The questions regarding MDawg have very little to do with whether he HAS (past tense) won

It's clear that Boz is talking about both the past and present.

Boz suggests that beating the casinos and getting comped are mutually exclusive, it can be one or the other but not both.

He understands that MDawg has not both beaten the casinos and gotten comped, so if MDawg is getting comped then Boz is questioning whether MDawg HAS won.

Here's another member whose opinion on the question of whether or not MDawg has won is more straightforward...

Quote: PokerGrinder

I don’t believe he is a long term winner

Quote: SOOPOO

Not controversial to be gambling that much. You know the controversy, if you want to call it that, is that the great majority here do not believe that you are winning at baccarat. My disbelief was that someone purports to have millions tied up in one stock play. Unless worth a hundred times that. Or really foolish.
I’ve been an anesthesiologist for 30 years. It would be more shocking if I wasn’t worth 7 figures. I think the only claim I would make here that others would doubt me on are my basketball shooting abilities. Personal bests... 67 free throws in a row. 25 college 3’s in a row. 11 NBA 3’s in a row. All after the age of 50.

That’s damn impressive!

Quote: MDawg

Isn't there a rule against quoting only part of what someone says if it mischaracterizes the post? Or does DRich not know what the word facetious means?

From my understanding you're supposed to quote a complete sentence and that's it. I think it depends on the situation,(context matters). If you short quote someone in order to shame, insult or offend them then that's where there's a problem.

If you were to say, "Axel do you have any crack, I really need to get my fix on?"

I don't believe there would be an issue if I just quoted "Axel do you have any crack"
And just simply replied, "NO, I don't do crack!"

Quote: TDVegas

Getting markers at 21-22 raises some questions.

Just add that to the long list.

Quote: AxelWolf

Just add that to the long list.

It’s possible that the casino could see, even at the young age of 22, that they had a baccarat prodigy on their hands. Perhaps he was already adept at reading card flow.

Loaning him money via markers was therefore not a risk, since he wasn’t going to ever lose it.

Thought Id check in to see whats good back in the forum.... I see it is much of the same.

Hit and run folks... its the only way!

As far as sports goes.... well, been ABSOLUTELY killing it! Here is a little jingle for your pockets tonight. Take the Thunder / and over. GL

Hello! WMW.


Michael99000 is this you and your posts?
[link deleted by MDawg]
If so, that might explain the negativity of your posts here.

Quote: MDawg

Hello! WMW.


Michael99000 is this you and your posts?
[link redacted by mod]
If so, that might explain the negativity of your posts here.

MDawg.

This looks to me like

1. Michael99000 is the one living rent free in your head.

2. This is an attempt at doxxing, which we suspend for, but I'm going to leave at a warning, because you checked his forum name, and the account links to a non-existent or inactive account.

3. Which likely means it got taken offline due to your action, given the timing (in the last 15 minutes). So probably an unwelcome attack.

Just chill, for crying out loud.

Okay, you are right. Thank you. I guess all of us are equally entitled to our anonymity here.

Man is it that hard to obey the rules, or do I just not know them?

For example earlier didn't Soopoo call me "foolish"? I don't have a problem with his post and am not requesting any action, if any is even warranted. All in a day's work as far as I am concerned.

Quote: SOOPOO

Not controversial to be gambling that much. You know the controversy, if you want to call it that, is that the great majority here do not believe that you are winning at baccarat. My disbelief was that someone purports to have millions tied up in one stock play. Unless worth a hundred times that. Or really foolish.
I’ve been an anesthesiologist for 30 years. It would be more shocking if I wasn’t worth 7 figures. I think the only claim I would make here that others would doubt me on are my basketball shooting abilities. Personal bests... 67 free throws in a row. 25 college 3’s in a row. 11 NBA 3’s in a row. All after the age of 50.

Quote: MDawg

Okay, you are right. Thank you. I guess all of us are equally entitled to our anonymity here.

Man is it that hard to obey the rules, or do I just not know them?

For example earlier didn't Soopoo call me "foolish"? I don't have a problem with his post and am not requesting any action, if any is even warranted. All in a day's work as far as I am concerned.

No intent to call you foolish. My post stated someone tying up millions in one stock play would be foolish unless they were worth a large multiple of the amount tied up. For all I know you are worth a billion and the 4 or 5 million tied up was not a big deal to you. I'm pretty conservative, so, I wouldn't have that much tied up in a single stock deal unless worth in the hundreds of millions. I"M NOT!
Good luck at the tables.

Quote: MDawg

Okay, you are right. Thank you. I guess all of us are equally entitled to our anonymity here.

Man is it that hard to obey the rules, or do I just not know them?

For example earlier didn't Soopoo call me "foolish"? I don't have a problem with his post and am not requesting any action, if any is even warranted. All in a day's work as far as I am concerned.

You jumped in here almost like you knew the place well. You even seem to know everything about everybody for being a new poster and all.

I have a good feeling you know all 79 rules well.

I also saw something that you posted earlier what was against the rules. I don't have time to look for it right now.

Why don't you go back to your slots thread? You see how I contributed something worthwhile and relevant there? No snide remarks, no silliness.

If you can't do the same here, why keep posting.

Quote: Wizard

To those who don't like it, let me make a radical suggestion -- don't read it.

Quote: AxelWolf

You jumped in here almost like you knew the place well. You even seem to know everything about everybody for being a new poster and all.

I have a good feeling you know all 79 rules well.

I also saw something that you posted earlier what was against the rules. I don't have time to look for it right now.

What about rule B?

MD, if you buy me dinner I would love to come meet you. Can't play along side unless you will play $5 craps.

Somebody's twitter account went totally unhinged.

Quote: MDawg

Why don't you go back to your slots thread? You see how I contributed something worthwhile and relevant there? No snide remarks, no silliness.

If you can't do the same here, why keep posting.

What fun would that be?

Hi GWAE. You know what? that is a very polite nice introduction. Send me a private message let's talk about it.

Any of you guys know him in person?

I pulled only a five tonight there were two guys at the 100 min DD BJ hit 17. It pretty much went nowhere and then they changed the cards. Before they did the count wasn't really any good other than for about two or three hands on one shuffle and I jacked the bet some for two of those, hit a BJ on one, busted on the other when she got a ten up. The one player went completely bust and the other was barely holding his own. All three of us were playing perfect basic strategy, and the guy at the end seemed to increase his bet whenever I did, so maybe he was counting too. But it's only a double deck, the count only gets you so far. Lack of luck may negate all else.

Either I am constantly showing up just when they change the BJ cards or have just changed them, or because it is a game where we are allowed to touch the cards, they change them frequently. Anyway, I don't usually like playing with a brand new deck so I went over to the 300 min. Bacc table. One other player there a big one with stacks of yellow and purple chips.

The Bacc. shoe was near the end on not a very easy shoe, pretty random. Then I cut a new shoe and I started to lose I actually got down to just a grand, because I made the mistake of playing somewhat big into what looked like a pattern early in the shoe when in fact there was no pattern yet. Then I hit a sequence of 2 bank 2 player 2 bank 2 player and got them all for five hundred a hand. I read the shoe as two two two because it hadn't passed two yet, the entire shoe. That sequence got me basically even again. I putzed around a bit more, lost some of it back, and then hit a seven bank run but I entered it late I think on the fourth one? but I got four out of five on that run, and I pressed a little tossing a hundred on each win, 300, 400, 500, 600, 700, but I lost the 700 and won 1800 to make it 1100 minus commission on that run. Anyway, after that run ended I decided to quit and pay off the marker,

and after I paid commission this is what I walked to the cage with to cash. As I was leaving one the dealers was smiling broadly.

"I watch you play. You win, you go!" She made a chopping sweeping motion gesturing outside the pit. "That good!"

I just laughed and said, "Yes. It adds up."

HOWEVER, I am actually not liking the risk to reward benefit some of these days. Down almost four grand, then rally to walk with about five hunny ahead? That's no way to be.

But, it still remains - a win. And it adds up. But not really worth my time spent in Vegas honestly if I had nothing else to do here I'd be feeling like I was wasting my time here. I need a big run, but my mentality right now is small time hit and run, and I will not get a big hit unless I step it up. Sometimes though your big bet and the runs coincide and that is when you really take home the chips.

As I was standing at the cage, I was thinking, do I have some method to win at Baccarat some - special technique that is teachable? No, I do not, nor have I ever claimed to. I can teach general principles that apply to all gambling. But for whatever reason, I do tend to win at both BJ and Baccarat, and I have my ideas as to why, which I have expounded on many times here, but what difference does it make WHY I win, why change what isn't broken.

SOOPOO THANKS FOR WISHING ME LUCK I WAS THINKING ABOUT THAT ACTUALLY AS I WALKED TOWARDS THE PIT.

Quote: WatchMeWin

Thought Id check in to see whats good back in the forum.... I see it is much of the same.

Hit and run folks... its the only way!

As far as sports goes.... well, been ABSOLUTELY killing it! Here is a little jingle for your pockets tonight. Take the Thunder / and over. GL

Back to where i left off... 2-0 in nba tonight! Its real folks. Free pucks wont last long.

Noticed these videos yesterday in both high limit and regular pit, that include both this

and this animation.

Yeah...SOUNDS GOOD, in theory anyway. But you also may lose more, lose big by following this advice.

There is also a debit card terminal right at the high limit table to allow withdrawals of up to $2500. is what the pit boss said. That is pretty evil! I suppose the only thing more evil would be a credit card cash advance machine right at the tables.

I've never seen Baccarat played, so here's a live casino video to help me learn. There's a Banker/Player Pair Bet there.

BACCARAT PREMIERE STREAM!! $100/HAND! AWESOME RUN!! - YouTube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NxisM2JRJ08


I've never seen these side bets in Blackjack before: Flush Plus / Super Shot, Any Pair Pays 3 to 1.

BLACKJACK PREMIERE STREAM! INSANE SESSION!! CRUSHING THE SIDE BETS!! - YouTube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tt63Azxd_10


Superchat livestream that ended a few hours ago at a live casino Blackjack table.

Live Blackjack!! EPIC RUN!! $200 HANDS!! CRUSHING THE SIDE BETS!! - YouTube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N_OOJRnxdwk

Quote: MDawg

Okay, you are right. Thank you. I guess all of us are equally entitled to our anonymity here.

Man is it that hard to obey the rules, or do I just not know them?

It can be hard, even with the best of intentions.
I'm pretty shocked that a member saw fit to close down his twitter account though I don't see Mdawg's publicising it as doxxing.
How would Mdawg feel about publication of a route or link to his content on certain external sites.
Would he see it as good publicity or as stalking or doxxing?

Quote: MDawg

Noticed these videos yesterday in both high limit and regular pit, that include both this

and this animation.

Yeah...SOUNDS GOOD, in theory anyway. But you also may lose more, lose big by following this advice.

There is also a debit card terminal right at the high limit table to allow withdrawals of up to $2500. is what the pit boss said. That is pretty evil! I suppose the only thing more evil would be a credit card cash advance machine right at the tables.

In PA new law last year said ATMs and CC terminals are not allowed on the gaming floor at all. So they moved them all into the food areas right next to the gaming floor.

That’s a start. If the industry, politicians, regulators actually cared at all about curbing problem gambling instead of just putting on a face credit card advances in casinos would not be legal. Incredibly easy to prevent that sort of irresponsibility until someone’s off the floor and has a chance to think off floor if they wanted to. Yeah yeah personal responsibility I get it.

OnceDear: I deferred to BBB's judgment and deleted the link, but yes I didn't think it was doxxing either. To me doxxing is more like...someone doesn't pay for your online auction and you publicize his name address etc. to out him as a deadbeat, and even there some people would say that this is okay, some would say not. In any case, there was no such malicious "outing" intent here, and besides, a twitter account or at least that twitter account was pretty anonymous anyway in that it did not reveal the guy's name address personal identifying information, etc. Posting personal identifying information at this WOV forum would be wrong.

As far as posting the link to the other forum where I have my gambling corner, I do not own that forum but I imagine that the owner would not mind the publicity. I certainly would not mind it!

Quote: MDawg

OnceDear: I deferred to BBB's judgment and deleted the link, but yes I didn't think it was doxxing either. To me doxxing is more like...someone doesn't pay for your online auction and you publicize his name address etc. to out him as a deadbeat, and even there some people would say that this is okay, some would say not. In any case, there was no such malicious "outing" intent here, and besides, a twitter account or at least that twitter account was pretty anonymous anyway in that it did not reveal the guy's name address personal identifying information, etc. Posting personal identifying information at this WOV forum would be wrong.

As far as posting the link to the other forum where I have my gambling corner, I do not own that forum but I imagine that the owner would not mind the publicity. I certainly would not mind it!

MDawg,
I was told you are a lawyer, and you seem successful in your trade. So I'm surprised how you fail to interpret the rules and precedents here. Unlike maybe a court of law, we obviously don't appreciate the use of technicalities as an excuse for flouting the spirit of the rules.

With hindsight, I was inclined to suspend you for the linking: Not a Marty, but more than a warning. But BBB had already dealt with the issue.

Michael and all of us are entitled to use whatever identities we wish on multiple platforms. That, and google renders us a bit 'out there' in the public domain. C'st la vie. But posting derived data is at best discourteous and in this case, invasive.
You knew that by posting that link, you were adding a photo (probably) of a member. His facial likeness, and his interests unrelated to that forum should not have been posted here. I expect you'd be at least a bit bothered if your photo, or maybe some other off topic personal data was posted or liked to by members here.

And I wasn't referring to that other 'corner' of yours. I was referring to the platform with 5 items.

Yesterday's paper, right?

I don't have anything else planned today, no gym either since it is an off day and we just ate breakfast so...I'll probably go down and play early today.

I actually had to go back to the table last night to retrieve something I had left behind, which luckily the pit boss had put aside for me, and when I went back there the lady with all the yellow and purple chips had lost half of them. She made a face when I asked her how the shoe had been. I played alongside her two days ago briefly at the lower limit table too; she is a pretty big player I'd say average bet at least a couple thousand. But see that's the thing, many high rollers just play until they have lost it all, on each trip.

MD said to me:

Quote: MDawg

And this is more of the reason why I'd have no interest in meeting you.

I might give certain select groups a hard time on the forums(and that's where I keep it). I think it's painfully obvious, for the most part, the type of posters I give a hard time. No doubt, there have been times I veered off a little. At least I don't resort to malicious doxxing(or whatever you want to call it). It's clear your intentions were of a pernicious nature.

And this is now the reason why I'd have no interest in meeting you.

I certainly hope we didn't lose Michael over this.

Quote: MDawg

<snip>As I was standing at the cage, I was thinking, do I have some method to win at Baccarat some - special technique that is teachable? No, I do not<snip>

WHAT??? I've followed this thread for 84 tortuous pages only to find that MDawg is NOT going to teach me how to beat baccarat?

Well that's it... I'm through with this thread! ;-)

Dog Hand

Quote: DogHand

WHAT??? I've followed this thread for 84 tortuous pages only to find that MDawg is NOT going to teach me how to beat baccarat?

Well that's it... I'm through with this thread! ;-)

Dog Hand

Post of the day sir! ⭐️ ⭐️⭐️

It was a long session. I pulled 5K, lost it, more or less PROMPTLY, at DD hit 17 BJ. Just wasn't happening.

Then I pulled a ten and it took me HOURS of Bacc. play to win it all back, which actually, I had a shoe like this

where I was just CREAMING them on the bank runs, but...I was having such a good time I was barely betting more than four hundred a hand. That's the thing, I gotta step it up when I am winning.

Took a break to go to lunch with the lady who plays pretty big, and she is a local who plays pretty much daily. Very nice lady. We were discussing hit and run and she was saying that she had given up entirely on hit and run, because she found that it would lend to her winning say a few grand a day and stopping, and then losing MASS in one session where she gave back a week's worth of hit and run winnings, and then some. So now, she says she tries to win as much as possible each session. Anyway, she seems to have limitless funds because I've seen her playing here daily with around fifty grand each day, and she says she is in the hole for the week, trying to play catch up.

Not long after we resumed play, she left and I kept playing. This guy showed up and put 2200 in chips on player, on a brand new shoe, lost. Before he bet he said that this was all the money he had, but then he pulled out 2500 cash, converted it to chips, and put it all on one player hand, won, kept playing, ended up walking with about eight grand. He went to the bathroom for a while when I kept hitting players; it was a player's shoe. If he had stuck around for that portion of the shoe he could have won a lot more, because he bet player only, but still turning 2500 into eight grand in just a few hands was not bad. This last shoe I played was a player's shoe.

Anyway, I got just a hundred above even, quit. I paid the ten, and held on to the five K chip for tomorrow without paying off that first marker. Look at that five K chip, it looks phony I mean no substance to it. Do you agree?

I really do have a hard time not leaving when I come back from a loss to even.


After I stopped, I spent a long time talking with one of the pit bosses who used to work at one of the casinos I used play at big time in the old days. We exchanged a lot of "what happened to so and so" stories, and talked about the recent fate of Kaos at the Palms. Great guy, we really connected, warm talk.

During the session I glanced at my phone to check out the AH (after hours) and noticed AMZN down -43. Since we don't discuss politics we won't discuss why that is. Not good.

Nice day, lot of work, I did earn a lot of comps. Out of curiosity on the way back to the room, I stopped and asked their player's club how many points I earned today - they said a little above 32,000. Not bad for just one session. With Palms player's club all points start over January 1st, and I have about 76K now is what they said. 100K needed for President's level, which I am already President's anyway from last year, but 300K points needed for Chairman's level, which is their top level. All points must be earned by the end of June.