Thread Rating:

ziggynagy
ziggynagy
  • Threads: 1
  • Posts: 2
Joined: Dec 17, 2013
December 17th, 2013 at 12:52:05 PM permalink
Was up late last night thinking about craps and per roll probabilities after the come out roll when specific points are made. Found an interesting scenario for 5's. Didn't see this elsewhere and wanted your thoughts on the math. Also let me know if this is in the wrong section.

Assumptions: 2 pays 2x and 12 pays 3x in Field, 3x/4x/5x max odds, rolls that result in no win/loss are ignored

Strategy 1 (baseline)
Bet $5 Pass, point of 5 is made
*Max odds bet of 4x ($20)
House edge after the point is made: (((4/10)*35)+((6/10)*-25)))/25 = -4%

Strategy 2 (proposed strategy)
Bet $5 Pass, point of 5 is made
*Max odds bet of 4x ($20)
*Place bet on 6 for $12
*Place bet on 8 for $12
*Field bet for $5 (anytime this bet loses on a 6 or 8, replenish with earnings)
House edge after the point is made: (((1/36)*10)+((2/36)*5)+((3/36)*5)+((4/36)*(35-5))+((5/36)*(14-5))+((6/36)*-54)+((5/36)*(14-5))+((4/36)*5)+((3/36)*5)+((2/36)*5)+((1/36)*15))/54 = -0.977%

Was originally thinking of a cheap way to be invested in every roll and was surprised when I did out the math. I know systems are junk, so what's my mathematical error in Strategy 2 that gives a lower house edge?
sodawater
sodawater
  • Threads: 64
  • Posts: 3321
Joined: May 14, 2012
December 17th, 2013 at 1:14:27 PM permalink
OK, here is your error.

Your strategy 2 is the same as strategy 1, except with several negative-expectation bets added on. Therefore your strategy 2 must perform worse than strategy 1.
ziggynagy
ziggynagy
  • Threads: 1
  • Posts: 2
Joined: Dec 17, 2013
December 17th, 2013 at 1:21:59 PM permalink
Quote: sodawater

OK, here is your error.

Your strategy 2 is the same as strategy 1, except with several negative-expectation bets added on. Therefore your strategy 2 must perform worse than strategy 1.



So why when I worked out the values did I end up with a lower house edge in Strategy 2? Looking to see if there's an error in the math when I calculated the probability.
ChampagneFireball
ChampagneFireball
  • Threads: 16
  • Posts: 118
Joined: May 2, 2010
December 17th, 2013 at 1:27:24 PM permalink
Quote: ziggynagy

So why when I worked out the values did I end up with a lower house edge in Strategy 2? Looking to see if there's an error in the math when I calculated the probability.



Because your first calculation is per resolution, and your second calculation is per roll. If you only resolve the bet on a 5 or a 7, the house edge per roll will be less.
98Clubs
98Clubs
  • Threads: 52
  • Posts: 1728
Joined: Jun 3, 2010
December 17th, 2013 at 9:46:51 PM permalink
That and 5-6-8 lose on the field-bet. Never hedge a (presumed) winner. No faith, no $$$$.
Some people need to reimagine their thinking.
dwheatley
dwheatley
  • Threads: 25
  • Posts: 1246
Joined: Nov 16, 2009
December 18th, 2013 at 7:01:38 AM permalink
Quote: ChampagneFireball

Because your first calculation is per resolution, and your second calculation is per roll. If you only resolve the bet on a 5 or a 7, the house edge per roll will be less.



This, plus other problems. You are comparing apples to oranges, because the house edge you are measuring is calculated against different values, over different length of times. You should just look at the expectation and be done with it. Expectation in the 1st case: -$1 per resolution. Expectation in the 2nd case: worse.
Wisdom is the quality that keeps you out of situations where you would otherwise need it
debitncredit
debitncredit
  • Threads: 53
  • Posts: 156
Joined: Jul 4, 2012
December 18th, 2013 at 12:46:45 PM permalink
Quote: ChampagneFireball

Because your first calculation is per resolution, and your second calculation is per roll. If you only resolve the bet on a 5 or a 7, the house edge per roll will be less.



Oh, SNAP!
MathExtremist
MathExtremist
  • Threads: 88
  • Posts: 6526
Joined: Aug 31, 2010
December 18th, 2013 at 3:56:22 PM permalink
Quote: ziggynagy

Was up late last night thinking about craps and per roll probabilities after the come out roll when specific points are made. Found an interesting scenario for 5's. Didn't see this elsewhere and wanted your thoughts on the math. Also let me know if this is in the wrong section.

Assumptions: 2 pays 2x and 12 pays 3x in Field, 3x/4x/5x max odds, rolls that result in no win/loss are ignored

Strategy 1 (baseline)
Bet $5 Pass, point of 5 is made
*Max odds bet of 4x ($20)
House edge after the point is made: (((4/10)*35)+((6/10)*-25)))/25 = -4%

Strategy 2 (proposed strategy)
Bet $5 Pass, point of 5 is made
*Max odds bet of 4x ($20)
*Place bet on 6 for $12
*Place bet on 8 for $12
*Field bet for $5 (anytime this bet loses on a 6 or 8, replenish with earnings)
House edge after the point is made: (((1/36)*10)+((2/36)*5)+((3/36)*5)+((4/36)*(35-5))+((5/36)*(14-5))+((6/36)*-54)+((5/36)*(14-5))+((4/36)*5)+((3/36)*5)+((2/36)*5)+((1/36)*15))/54 = -0.977%

Was originally thinking of a cheap way to be invested in every roll and was surprised when I did out the math. I know systems are junk, so what's my mathematical error in Strategy 2 that gives a lower house edge?



You're dividing by too much. If the point is 5, you make your extra bets, and then you roll a 6, you're only resolving the field and place 6 bets. That's not 54 in action, just 11.

To test this, ignore the line and field bets and just repeat your calculations for the place 6 bet alone, then just the place 6 + 8 bets. You know the edge is the same for both of them, but what do your calculations show?
"In my own case, when it seemed to me after a long illness that death was close at hand, I found no little solace in playing constantly at dice." -- Girolamo Cardano, 1563
7craps
7craps
  • Threads: 18
  • Posts: 1977
Joined: Jan 23, 2010
December 19th, 2013 at 1:22:49 PM permalink
Quote: ziggynagy

Was up late last night thinking about craps and per roll probabilities after the come out roll when specific points are made. Found an interesting scenario for 5's.

cool, thinking about craps and per roll probabilities. Ziggy played guitar
Quote: ziggynagy

Was originally thinking of a cheap way to be invested in every roll and was surprised when I did out the math.

you are a lucky one. I am never surprised by the math any more. Ziggy really sang
Quote: ziggynagy

I know systems are junk...

"One man's junk is another man's treasure"

here be my results

per roll for P5
ev: -$0.277777778
edge: -0.011111111
avg bet: $25

your S2 Iron Cross
ev: -$0.527777778
edge: -0.027377522
avg bet: $19.27777778
you may want to check my math

When one considers the average resolved bet at $54,
it sure does have a smaller edge but the ev is still the same as the avg resolved bet value.
edge = ev / avg bet

Good Luck in your late night thinking sessions
winsome johnny (not Win some johnny)
  • Jump to: