Thread Rating:
(hits 'Flag Post')
Maybe Phil Ivey would be interested.Quote: winloseI only plan on selling 20 of these systems and ask that the buyer does not share it
Does this sound legitimate to you ? Please be honest as $1,000 is a lot of money for me !
Quote: BuzzardPlease do not flag this post. I am negotiating with PM's . I am retired and this seems like a great way to suppliment my Social Security check.
Buzzard, I'm not sure what "do not flag this post" even means, but, I implore you, please reconsider your stated intentions.
I have been playing Baccarat for many years, and this much I can state as fact: There exists no winning "system" for this game.
The player's edges at this game come mostly subjectively, from within each personal player.
No one can give you any set bet selection process and/or money management process that will consistently win at this game.
Again I implore you....please rethink your intentions before you find yourself in an untenable position.
Quote: gr8playerBuzzard, I'm not sure what "do not flag this post" even means, but, I implore you, please reconsider your stated intentions.
Geez, he was joking. Good grief..
Quote: gr8playerI have been playing Baccarat for many years, and this much I can state as fact: There exists no winning "system" for this game.
[snip]
No one can give you any set bet selection process and/or money management process that will consistently win at this game.
Ah, so now the truth comes out!.....Good for you!
Quote: EvenBobGeez, he was joking. Good grief..
I apologize gr8player. No offense taken, I hope. Just wanted to see how far the OP would go to get my $1,000.
Once again EvenBob is the voice of reason !
Its like a poker hand. When something just doesnt add up its most likely a bluff.
This obviously is a bluff 100%
Good luck beating the math sir.
Quote: BuzzardBut I thought you had posted " By way of introduction, I'm a confirmed Baccarat "trender" .
Yes, I did. And, I am.
But it is a mistake to confuse trending with any pre-set "system".
I trend the current prevalent characteristics of each particular shoe, or portion thereof.
Nothing "pre-set" nor "systematic" 'bout that.
I utilize certain statistics (both variance- and streak-related) of each of my preferred trend plays.
Nothing "pre-set" nor "systematic" 'bout that.
I bet when I deem it advantageous to do so.
Nothing "pre-set" nor "systematic" 'bout that.
I bet where I deem it advantageous to do so.
Nothing "pre-set" nor "systematic" 'bout that.
I bet the amount that I deem advantageous for myself.
Nothing "pre-set" nor "systematic" 'bout that.
I terminate a session as I deem it advantageous to do so.
Nothing "pre-set" nor "systematic" 'bout that.
I choose to control that which I can and do have control over, always in my best interests.
Absolutely nothing "pre-set" nor "systematic" 'bout that.
Yes, Buzzard, I surely am a confirmed trender. Quite good at it, too.......
Quote: nezbitThis obviously is a bluff 100%
Duh!
Quote: Beethoven9thI deem that you're scared to death of rdw4potus' challenge.
He'll never accept it. Gr8 was on Gamblers Glen for years
spouting the same unbacked up flooey, and here he is still
at it. People got so frustrated they would scream at him,
it was fairly entertaining. He's that character in Catch 22
that drives Yossarian nuts because he never gets mad or
catches on, no matter what you say to him.
Quote: EvenBobHe'll never accept it. Gr8 was on Gamblers Glen for years
spouting the same unbacked up flooey, and here he is still
at it. People got so frustrated they would scream at him,
it was fairly entertaining. He's that character in Catch 22
that drives Yossarian nuts because he never gets mad or
catches on, no matter what you say to him.
Hello, EvenBob. I trust all with well with you.
There is no challenge to accept. Never was. And it simply isn't "fair game" to judge anyone negatively over any non-existant happenstance. I'm not exactly sure why Beethoven9th insists on constantly bringing this non-existant happenstance to the forefront in his latest posts, but I do have my suspicions.
As to my "still being at it" all these years, I happen to enjoy engaging in Bac-related conversation, as I am a devout follower of the game.
Yes, I have my idio-syncracies, my likes and dislikes regarding the game, and I relate them willingly in this forum. Might I have selected a better-suited forum fto espouse my sort of thinking/methodology as it relates to long-term Baccarat play? Probably so.
But, here I am. And, generally speaking, I enjoy my time spent here.
Quote: gr8player
As to my "still being at it" all these years, I happen to enjoy engaging in Bac-related conversation,.
If you can't play and win, you can at least talk
about it, right? Whatever.
Quote: gr8playerYes, I did. And, I am.
But it is a mistake to confuse trending with any pre-set "system".
I trend the current prevalent characteristics of each particular shoe, or portion thereof.
Nothing "pre-set" nor "systematic" 'bout that.
I utilize certain statistics (both variance- and streak-related) of each of my preferred trend plays.
Nothing "pre-set" nor "systematic" 'bout that.
I bet when I deem it advantageous to do so.
Nothing "pre-set" nor "systematic" 'bout that.
I bet where I deem it advantageous to do so.
Nothing "pre-set" nor "systematic" 'bout that.
I bet the amount that I deem advantageous for myself.
Nothing "pre-set" nor "systematic" 'bout that.
I terminate a session as I deem it advantageous to do so.
Nothing "pre-set" nor "systematic" 'bout that.
I choose to control that which I can and do have control over, always in my best interests.
Absolutely nothing "pre-set" nor "systematic" 'bout that.
Yes, Buzzard, I surely am a confirmed trender. Quite good at it, too.......
I have someone for you to meet. I think you guys would really hit it off. His name is Ahigh (forum name). I feel like you guys could become best friends.
ZCore13
Quote: EvenBobHe'll never accept it. Gr8 was on Gamblers Glen for years
spouting the same unbacked up flooey, and here he is still
at it. People got so frustrated they would scream at him,
it was fairly entertaining. He's that character in Catch 22
that drives Yossarian nuts because he never gets mad or
catches on, no matter what you say to him.
So he's been spouting this stuff for years? *facepalm*
Quote: gr8playerThere is no challenge to accept. Never was. And it simply isn't "fair game" to judge anyone negatively over any non-existant happenstance. I'm not exactly sure why Beethoven9th insists on constantly bringing this non-existant happenstance to the forefront in his latest posts, but I do have my suspicions.
Guess you don't have much faith in your "thinking/methodology", either.
Quote: Beethoven9thSo he's been spouting this stuff for years? *facepalm*
Since 2007, that I know of. Over 1500 posts on one board alone.
OK, I'll take 12 copies.Quote: winloseI only plan on selling 20 of these systems and ask that the buyer does not share it
Quote: winloseI have figured out a system for baccarat that works. But I am not giving it away. It took me to many hours of time and money to figure it out. But will sell it.
I can guess it for free.
Let's see...
It's a system....
It took many hours...
It took lots of money...
Hours and money...
I got it!
Don't play Baccarat!!!
LOL A guy with a baccarat system that apparently is close to broke because 1k is a lot to him PRICELESSQuote: winloseI have figured out a system for baccarat that works. But I am not giving it away. It took me to many hours of time and money to figure it out. But will sell it.
Please be honest as $1,000 is a lot of money for me
Quote: 24BingoI've got to say, I've seen some pretty strange defenses of systems betting before, but gr8player is just through the rabbit hole. "Players' edge"? "Subjective edge"? "Cannot judge nonexistent happenstance"? What?
Hello, 24Bingo. I trust all is well with you.
So now it's a matter of my "pretty strange defenses", 24Bingo? Really? I think not. I think that people choose to understand that which they want to understand, and disregard all else. That makes that last "What?" at the very end of your post rather more your problem then mine, for methinks that you (and others 'round here that think/believe similarly) have no compunction whatsoever to understand my personal Bac theories/methodologies. Hence, the rather casual dismissal, in your minds, of same.
I get it. Really, I do. It's OK. The math is on your side. I get it, and I'm fine with it.
But while I concede that math (read: the house edge) is both real and formidable, that does not preclude me from believing in "my math" (read: my personal variances and bet selection statistics) and "my player's edges" (read: controlling that which I can control....betting when, where, how much, and effective/efficient win/loss points). Mine are as real to me as the casino's math is to you.
There's no "rabbit hole", no "hocus pocus"......just a well-planned Bac game that, cumulatively, affords me the very best possible position for long-term success.
And, yet again, I wish it for all of you.
Quote: gr8playerThere's no "rabbit hole", no "hocus pocus"......just a well-planned Bac game that, cumulatively, affords me the very best possible position for long-term success.
Yeah, until someone challenges you. Then you backtrack.
(I'm still waiting for you to accept rdw4potus' challenge)
Quote: gr8playerHello, 24Bingo. I trust all is well with you.
So now it's a matter of my "pretty strange defenses", 24Bingo? Really? I think not. I think that people choose to understand that which they want to understand, and disregard all else. That makes that last "What?" at the very end of your post rather more your problem then mine, for methinks that you (and others 'round here that think/believe similarly) have no compunction whatsoever to understand my personal Bac theories/methodologies. Hence, the rather casual dismissal, in your minds, of same.
I get it. Really, I do. It's OK. The math is on your side. I get it, and I'm fine with it.
But while I concede that math (read: the house edge) is both real and formidable, that does not preclude me from believing in "my math" (read: my personal variances and bet selection statistics) and "my player's edges" (read: controlling that which I can control....betting when, where, how much, and effective/efficient win/loss points). Mine are as real to me as the casino's math is to you.
There's no "rabbit hole", no "hocus pocus"......just a well-planned Bac game that, cumulatively, affords me the very best possible position for long-term success.
And, yet again, I wish it for all of you.
C'mon... April Fools? This is Ahigh isn't it? Different name for a different game, but the same fable??
ZCore13
Quote: Zcore13C'mon... April Fools? This is Ahigh isn't it? Different name for a different game, but the same fable??
gr8player posts whenever he gets done watering his magic beans in the backyard.
Quote: gr8playerBut while I concede that math (read: the house edge) is both real and formidable, that does not preclude me from believing in "my math" (read: my personal variances and bet selection statistics) and "my player's edges" (read: controlling that which I can control....betting when, where, how much, and effective/efficient win/loss points). Mine are as real to me as the casino's math is to you.
No - no, no, no - there is no "your math" and "my math." There is only "math." I don't think we can get much deeper down that rabbit hole than thinking math can be subjective. That's pretty much Wonderland right there. In fact, some would argue that was sort of the joke.
Because then They would get him for sure! You know... ban him, beat him in the alley, see that he had to pay taxes, deport him. So its a deal man... go for it but be warned, they will try to kill you.Quote: nezbitOMFG... people are u serious? Do you really think he would sell info on a game (and believe me there is none) when he could just go sit high stakes and make millions? why the F*$* would he care about selling the info?