November 16th, 2020 at 4:14:45 PM
permalink

Greetings

I have a roulette bet that has been tested on 30 sessions of 100 spins and shows flat staking earnings of +0.723 units per spin over 3000 spins. This is on a single zero roulette that features 37 numbers.

Please advise what is the winning edge I have over the house casino playing live.

Cheers

R.

I have a roulette bet that has been tested on 30 sessions of 100 spins and shows flat staking earnings of +0.723 units per spin over 3000 spins. This is on a single zero roulette that features 37 numbers.

Please advise what is the winning edge I have over the house casino playing live.

Cheers

R.

November 17th, 2020 at 3:16:28 AM
permalink

You don't.Quote:XXVVGreetings

I have a roulette bet that has been tested on 30 sessions of 100 spins and shows flat staking earnings of +0.723 units per spin over 3000 spins. This is on a single zero roulette that features 37 numbers.

Please advise what is the winning edge I have over the house casino playing live.

Cheers

R.

The house has a winning edge of 1/37=2.7%

Beware. The earth is NOT flat.
Hit and run is not a winning strategy:
Pressing into trends IS not a winning strategy:
Progressives are not a winning strategy:
Don't Buy It! .Don't even take it for free.

November 17th, 2020 at 8:16:42 AM
permalink

this is a completely inadequate sample sizeQuote:XXVV3000 spins

the next time Dame Fortune toys with your heart, your soul and your wallet, raise your glass and praise her thus: “Thanks for nothing, you cold-hearted, evil, damnable, nefarious, low-life, malicious monster from Hell!” She is, after all, stone deaf. ... Arnold Snyder

November 17th, 2020 at 8:30:24 AM
permalink

If I did this right, this would be a 25.9 standard deviation event betting even money or a 6.6 standard deviation event betting one number per spin.

The race is not always to the swift, nor the battle to the strong; but that is the way to bet.

November 17th, 2020 at 12:05:23 PM
permalink

Quote:XXVVGreetings

I have a roulette bet that has been tested on 30 sessions of 100 spins and shows flat staking earnings of +0.723 units per spin over 3000 spins. This is on a single zero roulette that features 37 numbers.

Please advise what is the winning edge I have over the house casino playing live.

As already answered, your "winning edge" is -2.7% if all even-money bets lose the entire bet on a zero (or -1.35% if you lose only half).

Questions:

1. You say you earn 0.723 units per spin; how many units are you betting per spin?

2. You say "flat staking"; does this mean every bet is the same, or at least the total amount bet is the same (but possibly on different numbers), on every spin?

November 17th, 2020 at 11:02:50 PM
permalink

Where do I purchases the system?

♪♪Now you swear and kick and beg us That you're not a gamblin' man Then you find you're back in Vegas With a handle in your hand♪♪ Your black cards can make you money So you hide them when you're able In the land of casinos and money You must put them on the table♪♪ You go back Jack do it again roulette wheels turinin' 'round and 'round♪♪ You go back Jack do it again♪♪

November 17th, 2020 at 11:40:50 PM
permalink

If you have a $10 bet per spin, and 100 spins per session, your bet total would be $1,000. With a +0.723 unit win per spin, you'll be up $723 per 100 spins. After 30 sessions, you'll be up $21,690 out of $30,000 bet.

$51,690/$30,000 = 172.3% payback

$51,690/$30,000 = 172.3% payback

November 21st, 2020 at 9:53:47 PM
permalink

Thanks for reply..

1. 1 unit per spin per target bet

2. Yes every bet is the same on 9 numbers as targets (per set).

3. I play multiple sets of up to five featuring wheel sections for example or finales ( number ending) - always in 4 divisions.

1. 1 unit per spin per target bet

2. Yes every bet is the same on 9 numbers as targets (per set).

3. I play multiple sets of up to five featuring wheel sections for example or finales ( number ending) - always in 4 divisions.

November 21st, 2020 at 9:55:44 PM
permalink

Ha

You need me to prove this works by providing a set of outcomes you have witnessed and I will send my results to you - 100 spin sample.

You need me to prove this works by providing a set of outcomes you have witnessed and I will send my results to you - 100 spin sample.

November 21st, 2020 at 10:07:18 PM
permalink

Thank you for reply.

My data is based on no progression, just level/ flat staking.

I have 9 numbers to target on a French Wheel ( single zero) playing 1 set.

In professional play I often use 3 sets ad other overlapping techniques but I completed my study on 30 independent sets of 100 spins.

Whether I play one set or three the rate of earning is + 0.723 ( average) per spin per set.

The reason my bet wins is that I use 'Cluster Analysis' identifying clustering tendencies into 4 groups of 9 numbers ( with one number excluded).

I was trying to establish what is the 'edge' in my favor.

I guess your answer above states that.

My sample is 30 sessions of 100 spins and taking it session by session I had been advised 30 sessions was a suitable statistical sample.

27 of the sessions won, and two were small losses, one a little more- arrived at by testing 5 sets (ie 5x100 spins) x 30 sessions.

Thanks.

I am totally sincere.

I live in New Zealand.

Kind Regards

R.

My data is based on no progression, just level/ flat staking.

I have 9 numbers to target on a French Wheel ( single zero) playing 1 set.

In professional play I often use 3 sets ad other overlapping techniques but I completed my study on 30 independent sets of 100 spins.

Whether I play one set or three the rate of earning is + 0.723 ( average) per spin per set.

The reason my bet wins is that I use 'Cluster Analysis' identifying clustering tendencies into 4 groups of 9 numbers ( with one number excluded).

I was trying to establish what is the 'edge' in my favor.

I guess your answer above states that.

My sample is 30 sessions of 100 spins and taking it session by session I had been advised 30 sessions was a suitable statistical sample.

27 of the sessions won, and two were small losses, one a little more- arrived at by testing 5 sets (ie 5x100 spins) x 30 sessions.

Thanks.

I am totally sincere.

I live in New Zealand.

Kind Regards

R.