Thread Rating:

Poll

25 votes (49.01%)
16 votes (31.37%)
7 votes (13.72%)
4 votes (7.84%)
12 votes (23.52%)
3 votes (5.88%)
6 votes (11.76%)
5 votes (9.8%)
12 votes (23.52%)
10 votes (19.6%)

51 members have voted

Ace2
Ace2 
  • Threads: 33
  • Posts: 2881
Joined: Oct 2, 2017
March 27th, 2026 at 9:43:41 AM permalink
To determine the width of the tank from a single point, no measured angles, I think you’d need to know the distance to the tank. Then you could do it by measuring how much of a fixed object (at a fixed distance) it blocks from sight
It’s all about making that GTA
AutomaticMonkey
AutomaticMonkey
  • Threads: 21
  • Posts: 1595
Joined: Sep 30, 2024
March 27th, 2026 at 11:04:40 AM permalink
Quote: Ace2

To determine the width of the tank from a single point, no measured angles, I think you’d need to know the distance to the tank. Then you could do it by measuring how much of a fixed object (at a fixed distance) it blocks from sight
link to original post



I don't think you could do it without measuring angles, being you can only see the endpoints of a perpendicular diameter across the tank at infinity.

There are ways to measure radii of curvature optically, like the way you would inspect a lens or curved mirror. If I had a lens bench and some sample lenses I could do it. Might even be able to do it with a surveyor's transit, see what I have to do to keep the telescope in focus when looking at a different point on the tank.

The surface of the tank makes a difference too. If there were markings or gradations on the tank that would help, even if it was just a chip in the paint. If it was a perfectly uniform Lambertian surface all around there would be no visual distinction between any two points on the tank, not sure what you would do.
  • Jump to: