callme4furniture
callme4furniture
  • Threads: 1
  • Posts: 3
Joined: Aug 11, 2010
August 11th, 2010 at 4:54:11 PM permalink
If you deal out 13 cards to 4 stacks, is it easier to 6 pairs and an extra card or no face cards? (10s included in the no face card)
mkl654321
mkl654321
  • Threads: 65
  • Posts: 3412
Joined: Aug 8, 2010
August 11th, 2010 at 9:18:08 PM permalink
If I deal them face up, it will be equally easy to do either.
The fact that a believer is happier than a skeptic is no more to the point than the fact that a drunken man is happier than a sober one. The happiness of credulity is a cheap and dangerous quality.---George Bernard Shaw
weaselman
weaselman
  • Threads: 20
  • Posts: 2349
Joined: Jul 11, 2010
August 12th, 2010 at 4:48:45 AM permalink
the probability of not getting any face cards in 13 drawn out of a single deck is
36/52*35/51*34/50 ... * 23/39 = (36!*38!)/(22!*52!) = 0.002146

I am a little confused about the other condition. Why are we drawing to 4 stacks? Does it mean that we can only pair up the top cards in the stacks? For example if the first four cards are 2 3 4 5, and the next for are 5 4 3 2, is this four pairs or none?
"When two people always agree one of them is unnecessary"
miplet
miplet
  • Threads: 5
  • Posts: 2142
Joined: Dec 1, 2009
August 12th, 2010 at 5:46:52 PM permalink
Quote: weaselman

the probability of not getting any face cards in 13 drawn out of a single deck is
36/52*35/51*34/50 ... * 23/39 = (36!*38!)/(22!*52!) = 0.002146

I am a little confused about the other condition. Why are we drawing to 4 stacks? Does it mean that we can only pair up the top cards in the stacks? For example if the first four cards are 2 3 4 5, and the next for are 5 4 3 2, is this four pairs or none?


Your formula is for 14 cards not 13. 36 to 23 is 14 cards.
I assume your are delt 13 cards from a 52 card deck for both:
there are combin(36,13)ways to get no faces 2310789600
there are combin(13,6)*pow(6,6)*28 ways to get 6 pairs and a single card 2241727488
If you are counting quads as 2 pair and/or trips as a pair and the single card, there are more ways. I'll calculate tem if you need them.
“Man Babes” #AxelFabulous
weaselman
weaselman
  • Threads: 20
  • Posts: 2349
Joined: Jul 11, 2010
August 12th, 2010 at 6:33:53 PM permalink
Quote: miplet

Your formula is for 14 cards not 13. 36 to 23 is 14 cards.


Indeed. Today must be one of my "off by one" days :) For 13 cards, I get 0.00364.
"When two people always agree one of them is unnecessary"
callme4furniture
callme4furniture
  • Threads: 1
  • Posts: 3
Joined: Aug 11, 2010
August 13th, 2010 at 12:41:53 PM permalink
basically this is for 13 card poker or commonly called 13 card chinese poker, im a little confused on some bonus bets that are given. It seems like with 13 cards its easier to get no face cards than it is to get 6 pairs with an extra card.
Wizard
Administrator
Wizard
  • Threads: 1518
  • Posts: 27033
Joined: Oct 14, 2009
August 13th, 2010 at 12:54:07 PM permalink
For six pairs and a singleton:

Combinations = COMBIN(13,6)*7*6^6*4 = 2241727488
Probability = 0.003530204.

No face cards:

Combinations = COMBIN(40,13) = 12033222880
Probability = 0.018949553.
"For with much wisdom comes much sorrow." -- Ecclesiastes 1:18 (NIV)
weaselman
weaselman
  • Threads: 20
  • Posts: 2349
Joined: Jul 11, 2010
August 13th, 2010 at 6:38:05 PM permalink
Why 40? Aren't there 36 non-face cards, counting 10s?
"When two people always agree one of them is unnecessary"
Doc
Doc
  • Threads: 46
  • Posts: 7287
Joined: Feb 27, 2010
August 13th, 2010 at 7:09:16 PM permalink
I suppose it depends on whether you consider the ace a "face" card.
Wizard
Administrator
Wizard
  • Threads: 1518
  • Posts: 27033
Joined: Oct 14, 2009
August 13th, 2010 at 8:27:19 PM permalink
Quote: weaselman

Why 40? Aren't there 36 non-face cards, counting 10s?



I didn't count 10s or aces. There aren't faces on either of them.
"For with much wisdom comes much sorrow." -- Ecclesiastes 1:18 (NIV)
weaselman
weaselman
  • Threads: 20
  • Posts: 2349
Joined: Jul 11, 2010
August 13th, 2010 at 8:55:22 PM permalink
If there aren't faces on them, they are non-face cards, aren't they? I take it, that you meant to say you DID count them (or else, you should have gotten even fewer non-faces). I am also guessing, that, like Doc said, you also counted aces as non-face - that would explain the discrepancy I am after.
"When two people always agree one of them is unnecessary"
Wizard
Administrator
Wizard
  • Threads: 1518
  • Posts: 27033
Joined: Oct 14, 2009
August 13th, 2010 at 9:55:55 PM permalink
Correct, I don't count aces as face cards either. Only jacks, queen, and kings have faces on them. That leaves 40 cards without faces.
"For with much wisdom comes much sorrow." -- Ecclesiastes 1:18 (NIV)
callme4furniture
callme4furniture
  • Threads: 1
  • Posts: 3
Joined: Aug 11, 2010
August 16th, 2010 at 11:46:26 AM permalink
thank you wizard! I didn't want you to add the aces or 10's
  • Jump to: