danepeterson
danepeterson
  • Threads: 11
  • Posts: 43
Joined: Apr 23, 2012
May 5th, 2012 at 5:25:23 PM permalink
Assume I'm playing on a single 0 roulette wheel. My total bankroll is $100,000. Minimum straight up bet is $5 and Max is $100. If I follow this progressive betting pattern below it allows me to place 5 straight up bets each spin and if I win one of them I will make a 20% ROI or more no matter what round of betting I hit one of my 5 numbers in (except the last round at 14%.) I have 30 chances to hit one of my 5 chosen numbers.

Betting
Sequence
Amount Per
Straight Up
Position
Total
Wagered
Investment Win Net Gain Profit ROI
1 $1 $5 -$5 +$35 $31 $31 620.00%
2 $1 $5 -$10 +$35 $31 $27 270.00%
3 $1 $5 -$15 +$35 $31 $22 146.67%
4 $1 $5 -$20 +$35 $31 $17 85.00%
5 $1 $5 -$25 +$35 $31 $12 48.00%
6 $1 $5 -$30 +$35 $31 $7 23.33%
7 $2 $10 -$40 +$70 $62 $33 82.50%
8 $2 $10 -$50 +$70 $62 $24 48.00%
9 $2 $10 -$60 +$70 $62 $14 23.33%
10 $3 $15 -$75 +$105 $93 $35 46.67%
11 $3 $15 -$90 +$105 $93 $21 23.33%
12 $4 $20 -$110 +$140 $124 $37 33.64%
13 $5 $25 -$135 +$175 $155 $49 36.30%
14 $6 $30 -$165 +$210 $186 $56 33.94%
15 $7 $35 -$200 +$245 $217 $58 29.00%
16 $9 $45 -$245 +$315 $279 $86 35.10%
17 $10 $50 -$295 +$350 $310 $74 25.08%
18 $12 $60 -$355 +$420 $372 $87 24.51%
19 $15 $75 -$430 +$525 $465 $122 28.37%
20 $18 $90 -$520 +$630 $558 $143 27.50%
21 $21 $105 -$625 +$735 $651 $149 23.84%
22 $25 $125 -$750 +$875 $775 $171 22.80%
23 $30 $150 -$900 +$1,050 $930 $205 22.78%
24 $35 $175 -$1,075 +$1,225 $1,085 $215 20.00%
25 $45 $225 -$1,300 +$1,575 $1,395 $355 27.31%
26 $55 $275 -$1,575 +$1,925 $1,705 $450 28.57%
27 $65 $325 -$1,900 +$2,275 $2,015 $495 26.05%
28 $75 $375 -$2,275 +$2,625 $2,325 $490 21.54%
29 $90 $450 -$2,725 +$3,150 $2,790 $590 21.65%
30 $100 $500 -$3,225 +$3,500 $3,100 $465 14.42%


So the odds of me not having one of my 5 numbers come up in the 30 spins is (32/37)^30 = 0.0128 = 1.28% = (1/77.9). Can I assume this means that in 77 rounds of 30 (2,310 spins total), I should expect to lose my entire bankroll of $3,225 once in 77 rounds of 30 spins? If this is true can I say that I'm expected to hit one of my 5 numbers in 30 spins, 76 times out of 77?

If I add up all the profits $4,540 and divide that by 30 to get my average profit per round of 30.

$4,540/30= $151.33

Couldn't I say that if I take my average profit per round of 30 spins $151.33 and multiply that by the 76 rounds of expected wins. Then subtract the 1 time that I am expected to lose my entire bankroll of $3,225

$151.33 * 76 = $11,501.08

$11,501.08 - $3,225 = $8,276.08

I understand that expected results aren't going to be the same as actual results but I'm just curious. I think I'm doing something wrong with my math because this seems way too easy to make money. The casino wouldn't have made it this easy to beat. Can someone tweak my math and show me what I'm doing wrong.

Thanks!!!
Dane Peterson
rdw4potus
rdw4potus
  • Threads: 80
  • Posts: 7237
Joined: Mar 11, 2010
May 5th, 2012 at 5:44:45 PM permalink
I'm not sure I understand your system well enough to find an error. But, since nothing you're doing changes the odds of the game, the expected loss from your system should be 1/37th of the total amount of money wagered.
"So as the clock ticked and the day passed, opportunity met preparation, and luck happened." - Maurice Clarett
mustangsally
mustangsally
  • Threads: 25
  • Posts: 2463
Joined: Mar 29, 2011
May 5th, 2012 at 5:56:01 PM permalink
your table makes no sense.

You bet $5 straight up and only win $35 for a net of $31???

Is this the new metric system?

I get $175 for a $5 wager on a win.

Time to party on a Saturday night!
I Heart Vi Hart
SOOPOO
SOOPOO
  • Threads: 123
  • Posts: 11465
Joined: Aug 8, 2010
May 5th, 2012 at 5:56:22 PM permalink
Quote: danepeterson


If I add up all the profits $4,540 and divide that by 30 to get my average profit per round of 30.

$4,540/30= $151.33

Couldn't I say that if I take my average profit per round of 30 spins $151.33 Can someone tweak my math and show me what I'm doing wrong.



Your average profit per completed round will be far less than $151.33. You hardly ever will make it to the final rounds where you start getting triple digit profits. The majority of your profits will fall into the less than $40 per round figure.

The previous poster said it succinctly. You will lose the 2.6% or so times the amount you bet, on average. No system will change that.
SOOPOO
SOOPOO
  • Threads: 123
  • Posts: 11465
Joined: Aug 8, 2010
May 5th, 2012 at 5:58:26 PM permalink
Quote: mustangsally

your table makes no sense.

You bet $5 straight up and only win $35 for a net of $31???

Is this the new metric system?

I get $175 for a $5 wager on a win.

Time to party on a Saturday night!



Sally? He is putting $1 on 5 separate numbers. Only one of those numbers can hit. He will win $35 on that number, and lose $4 on the 4 losers. It is time for you to party on a Saturday night.
rdw4potus
rdw4potus
  • Threads: 80
  • Posts: 7237
Joined: Mar 11, 2010
May 5th, 2012 at 6:07:45 PM permalink
Quote: SOOPOO

Your average profit per completed round will be far less than $151.33. You hardly ever will make it to the final rounds where you start getting triple digit profits. The majority of your profits will fall into the less than $40 per round figure.

The previous poster said it succinctly. You will lose the 2.6% or so times the amount you bet, on average. No system will change that.



I think this is the exact issue with the table. 151.33 is - I think, i haven't verified - the unweighted average of the wins. But the wins aren't equally likely to occur. The higher $$ wins are less likely to happen because the system restarts on a lower $$ win. So what is missing is a weighting of the probability of each win in this system.
"So as the clock ticked and the day passed, opportunity met preparation, and luck happened." - Maurice Clarett
weaselman
weaselman
  • Threads: 20
  • Posts: 2349
Joined: Jul 11, 2010
May 5th, 2012 at 6:39:34 PM permalink
Quote: danepeterson


If I add up all the profits $4,540 and divide that by 30 to get my average profit per round of 30.


Average is not the same as expectation though. Because the probabilities of each outcome are different, you have to weigh each value with its respective probability to compute the expected profit instead of straight, unweighted averaging.
Doing it correctly, expected profit from one round is $40.66

Edit: I gotta learn to check earlier replies before jumping in :) Sorry guys, but, at least, I have also given the actual expected value, not totally worthless :)
"When two people always agree one of them is unnecessary"
danepeterson
danepeterson
  • Threads: 11
  • Posts: 43
Joined: Apr 23, 2012
May 5th, 2012 at 7:55:52 PM permalink
Quote: mustangsally

your table makes no sense.

You bet $5 straight up and only win $35 for a net of $31???

Is this the new metric system?

I get $175 for a $5 wager on a win.

Time to party on a Saturday night!



sorry if i wasnt clear. Im making 5 straight up bets each spin. so with $5 wagered im placing $1 dollar on five different numbers. So if i win $35 on one of the numbers that hit minus the $4 dollars i lost equals $31.
Dane Peterson
danepeterson
danepeterson
  • Threads: 11
  • Posts: 43
Joined: Apr 23, 2012
May 5th, 2012 at 7:57:05 PM permalink
Quote: weaselman

Average is not the same as expectation though. Because the probabilities of each outcome are different, you have to weigh each value with its respective probability to compute the expected profit instead of straight, unweighted averaging.
Doing it correctly, expected profit from one round is $40.66



Hey how did you come up with 40.66??? can you show me the math.

Thanks!!!
Dane Peterson
danepeterson
danepeterson
  • Threads: 11
  • Posts: 43
Joined: Apr 23, 2012
May 5th, 2012 at 7:59:06 PM permalink
Quote: rdw4potus

I think this is the exact issue with the table. 151.33 is - I think, i haven't verified - the unweighted average of the wins. But the wins aren't equally likely to occur. The higher $$ wins are less likely to happen because the system restarts on a lower $$ win. So what is missing is a weighting of the probability of each win in this system.



Perfect how do I calculate the weighting of the probability of each win????
Dane Peterson
rdw4potus
rdw4potus
  • Threads: 80
  • Posts: 7237
Joined: Mar 11, 2010
May 5th, 2012 at 8:04:55 PM permalink
Quote: danepeterson

Perfect how do I calculate the weighting of the probability of each win????



spin 1: 5/37; spin2: 5/37*odds of not winning spin 1; spin 3: 5/37*odds of not winning spin1 or spin2; ...spin n. (I think...)

So the weighting of the higher payouts are extremely low.
"So as the clock ticked and the day passed, opportunity met preparation, and luck happened." - Maurice Clarett
guido111
guido111
  • Threads: 10
  • Posts: 707
Joined: Sep 16, 2010
May 5th, 2012 at 10:18:19 PM permalink
Quote: danepeterson

Hey how did you come up with 40.66??? can you show me the math.

Thanks!!!

expand your table to show these values in another column, as shown in the above post.

spin1 to spin30
0.135135135 multiply this by the profit from spin1
0.11687363 multiply this by the profit from spin2
0.101079897 and so on
0.087420451
0.075606877
0.065389731
0.056553281
0.048910946
0.042301358
0.036584959
0.031641045
0.027365228
0.023667225
0.020468951
0.017702877
0.015310596
0.013241596
0.011452192
0.009904598
0.008566139
0.007408553
0.006407397
0.005541532
0.004792677
0.004145018
0.00358488
0.003100437
0.002681459
0.0023191
0.002005708
then add them all up.
Avg win $40.66
Excel can use the sumproduct function.


98.716347% probability of winning one session.
53 in a row would be 0.504221119 (the median)(98.716347%^53)
or about a 50/50 chance of winning $41*53 before losing the starting bankroll.
weaselman
weaselman
  • Threads: 20
  • Posts: 2349
Joined: Jul 11, 2010
May 6th, 2012 at 5:48:53 AM permalink
Quote: danepeterson

Hey how did you come up with 40.66??? can you show me the math.


First probability is 5/37
Second is 32/37*5/37
Third: (32/37)^2*5/37
Nth: (32/37)^(N-1)*5/37

I used a spreadsheet to weigh your profit numbers at each step with these probabilities.

BTW, your table seems to be wrong. For example, looking at the last row:

30 $100 $500 -$3,225 +$3,500 $3,100 $465 14.42%

Your "net gain" $3100, the amount you have bet so far is $3225. The "profit" should be -$125, not +$465.
"When two people always agree one of them is unnecessary"
vendman1
vendman1
  • Threads: 9
  • Posts: 1034
Joined: Mar 12, 2012
May 6th, 2012 at 6:27:00 AM permalink
This system, is of course bunk...you're working against a HE of 2.63% all the time on a single zero wheel, nothing can change that. Period. End of Discussion. P.T. Barnum was right....one born every minute.
danepeterson
danepeterson
  • Threads: 11
  • Posts: 43
Joined: Apr 23, 2012
May 6th, 2012 at 4:25:50 PM permalink
Quote: weaselman

BTW, your table seems to be wrong. For example, looking at the last row:

30 $100 $500 -$3,225 +$3,500 $3,100 $465 14.42%

Your "net gain" $3100, the amount you have bet so far is $3225. The "profit" should be -$125, not +$465.



Thanks for the reply. Sorry my spreadsheet skills are pretty awful.


Betting
Sequence
Amount Per
Straight
Up Position
Total
Wagered
Investment Win Net Gain Profit ROI
1 $1 $5 -$5 +$35 $31 $31 620.00%
2 $1 $5 -$10 +$35 $31 $27 270.00%
3 $1 $5 -$15 +$35 $31 $22 146.67%
4 $1 $5 -$20 +$35 $31 $17 85.00%
5 $1 $5 -$25 +$35 $31 $12 48.00%
6 $1 $5 -$30 +$35 $31 $7 23.33%
7 $2 $10 -$40 +$70 $62 $34 85.00%
8 $2 $10 -$50 +$70 $62 $24 48.00%
9 $2 $10 -$60 +$70 $62 $14 23.33%
10 $3 $15 -$75 +$105 $93 $36 48.00%
11 $3 $15 -$90 +$105 $93 $21 23.33%
12 $4 $20 -$110 +$140 $124 $38 34.55%
13 $5 $25 -$135 +$175 $155 $50 37.04%
14 $6 $30 -$165 +$210 $186 $57 34.55%
15 $7 $35 -$200 +$245 $217 $59 29.50%
16 $9 $45 -$245 +$315 $279 $88 35.92%
17 $10 $50 -$295 +$350 $310 $75 25.42%
18 $12 $60 -$355 +$420 $372 $89 25.07%
19 $15 $75 -$430 +$525 $465 $125 29.07%
20 $18 $90 -$520 +$630 $558 $146 28.08%
21 $21 $105 -$625 +$735 $651 $152 24.32%
22 $25 $125 -$750 +$875 $775 $175 23.33%
23 $30 $150 -$900 +$1,050 $930 $210 23.33%
24 $35 $175 -$1,075 +$1,225 $1,085 $220 20.47%
25 $45 $225 -$1,300 +$1,575 $1,395 $365 28.08%
26 $55 $275 -$1,575 +$1,925 $1,705 $460 29.21%
27 $65 $325 -$1,900 +$2,275 $2,015 $505 26.58%
28 $75 $375 -$2,275 +$2,625 $2,325 $500 21.98%
29 $90 $450 -$2,725 +$3,150 $2,790 $605 22.20%
30 $100 $500 -$3,225 +$3,500 $3,100 $475 14.73%



What its supposed to say is after the 29th spin and no win i will be down -$2,725. On my 30th spin I invest $500 more dollars for a total investment of -$3,225. If one of my numbers hits on the 30th spin I will win $3,500 and lose $400. Which leave me with a total of $3,100. I had started the 30th round at -$2,725 and I now have $3,100 dollars. A profit of $475.
Dane Peterson
danepeterson
danepeterson
  • Threads: 11
  • Posts: 43
Joined: Apr 23, 2012
May 6th, 2012 at 4:46:23 PM permalink
Quote: guido111

98.716347% probability of winning one session.
53 in a row would be 0.504221119 (the median)(98.716347%^53)
or about a 50/50 chance of winning $41*53 before losing the starting bankroll.



Thanks awesome explanation!
Dane Peterson
buzzpaff
buzzpaff
  • Threads: 112
  • Posts: 5328
Joined: Mar 8, 2011
May 6th, 2012 at 4:49:41 PM permalink
Quote: vendman1

This system, is of course bunk...you're working against a HE of 2.63% all the time on a single zero wheel, nothing can change that. Period. End of Discussion. P.T. Barnum was right....one born every minute.



I agree. Unless he is betting Red. Then I am willing to provide his bankroll for 10% of the profits.
danepeterson
danepeterson
  • Threads: 11
  • Posts: 43
Joined: Apr 23, 2012
May 6th, 2012 at 5:56:48 PM permalink
Ok so If I average $40.66 a round of 30 spins with my betting progression. Each time I sit down and try a new round of 30 spins I have a 1/77 chance of losing my entire stating bankroll.

(32/37)^30 = 1/77

$40.66 * 76 = $3,090.16

$3,090.16 - $3,225 = -$134.84

The house edge is 1/37 = 2.7%

-$134.84 / 0.027 = -$4,989.08

So does this mean in 77 rounds of 30 spins I should expect to invest somewhere around $4,989.08 and have a total profit of -$134.84 because the of the house edge??? Obviously the actual results will differ but if i were able to approach infinite bets I should see this average come out???
Dane Peterson
danepeterson
danepeterson
  • Threads: 11
  • Posts: 43
Joined: Apr 23, 2012
May 6th, 2012 at 6:07:06 PM permalink
Quote: vendman1

This system, is of course bunk...you're working against a HE of 2.63% all the time on a single zero wheel, nothing can change that. Period. End of Discussion. P.T. Barnum was right....one born every minute.



Hey where did you get the 2.63% HE???
I thought the house edge is 1/37 = 0.027027027027 or 2.7%

Can you please show your math.

Thanks!
Dane Peterson
WongBo
WongBo
  • Threads: 62
  • Posts: 2126
Joined: Feb 3, 2012
May 6th, 2012 at 7:31:55 PM permalink
He forgot that it isn't 1/38 it is 1/37.
Common error in discussing roulette.
In a bet, there is a fool and a thief. - Proverb.
  • Jump to: