https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0snXqibsGMU
Quote: SiegfriedRoyYou don't need to count to win. Just watch this video and do exactly what Al Kaufman "The Professor" is doing. His method is MARTY-Proof because he bets more than a marty system!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0snXqibsGMU
LOL. yeah. No need to double or split. It's so damned simple. don't worry if you lose, you still have seven bullets left.
I sincerely hope no-one ever took that idiot seriously.
Quote: OnceDearLOL. yeah. No need to double or split. It's so damned simple. don't worry if you lose, you still have seven bullets left.
I sincerely hope no-one ever took that idiot seriously.
You should go to his youtube channel and watch the rest of his videos. He is so stupid and bold. He literally tells people to give him money to gamble for them and if his methods don't work, you don't have to pay him. What kind of proposition is that? He also says he is funny and entertaining so we should hire him to a next event. His rate is $500. How about all the WoV forum members collect money to hire this clown at a next meet and grill him with questions and math to humiliate him. I also hope nobody falls for his trick. It's worse than martingale.
Quote:It will work until it doesn't. Lots of small wins but they pale beside the frequent inevitable loss.
There, I fixed it for you.
$;o)
That's a winning system .....FOR HIM.Quote: SiegfriedRoyHe literally tells people to give him money to gamble for them and if his methods don't work, you don't have to pay him. What kind of proposit.
In my local, beatable Blackjack via counting is almost dead. 95% of all "blackjack" is CSM. Half of the remaining 5%, the penetration is not playable or has become so recently due to the Casino's counter-paranoia. Therefore, I figure there's only a couple years left for that in my local. On the other hand, in the US, I see more shoe games however a lot more heat in general. In my local, the general public doesn't see a difference between CSM "blackjack' and blackjack dealt from a shoe and so nobody complains over here.
These thoughts usually pop up in my head when there is a thread ranting about 6:5 BJ. If it is true that players have allowed this to grow and take over because they simply so rarely know any better, why haven't the casinos learned that there is also no reason to offer BJ games that can be counted? I can't square these two things: the growth of 6:5 and the felt need to offer countable BJ.
Quote: WinoHi Plopplopfizfiz,
In my local, beatable Blackjack via counting is almost dead. 95% of all "blackjack" is CSM. Half of the remaining 5%, the penetration is not playable or has become so recently due to the Casino's counter-paranoia. Therefore, I figure there's only a couple years left for that in my local. The general public doesn't see a difference between CSM "blackjack' and blackjack dealt from a shoe and so nobody complains over here.
I wouldn't be surprised if the general public prefers continuous shuffle machines (CSMs) because they prevent players from "ruining the order of the cards" by entering mid-shoe. Also, players who walk up to CSM tables don't feel like they have to "wait" for a new shoe and can play right away.
In my opinion, some in the general public feel that card counters are bad for them because:
1. They sometimes "play wrong" and "make the table lose"
2. They have forced casinos to introduce 6:5BJ games
3. If they win money, they are "taking it from other players" by making them lose, forcing casinos to cut back on comps, change the rules, etc.
Just my thoughts. Replies appreciated.
Pennsylvania is all S17 LS, and is continually setting revenue highs. Offering fair games for the recreational player is working out for them, give them half a chance to win and they keep coming back.