adamhubert
adamhubert
  • Threads: 1
  • Posts: 3
Joined: Aug 24, 2010
August 24th, 2010 at 10:23:00 AM permalink
I read the section on wizardofodds.com about the cancellation strategy. I can pick a winning horse about 60% of the time at close to 1/1 odds. What are my chances of losing it all and how much of a return should I be looking for to build the bankroll. I'm starting with $1000 and want to get to $100,000 so that I can just go for say $5000 a week but I don't want to wait for years to build it up.
adamhubert
adamhubert
  • Threads: 1
  • Posts: 3
Joined: Aug 24, 2010
August 24th, 2010 at 11:33:35 AM permalink
nothing? nobody? calling all math geeks. And just to clarify, I can't sit down and look at a tracks 10 races for the day and pick 6 winners, it's way more complex than that. I end up betting on about 70 races a week out of the hundreds that run.
rdw4potus
rdw4potus
  • Threads: 80
  • Posts: 7237
Joined: Mar 11, 2010
August 24th, 2010 at 11:56:30 AM permalink
Quote: adamhubert

I read the section on wizardofodds.com about the cancellation strategy. I can pick a winning horse about 60% of the time at close to 1/1 odds. What are my chances of losing it all and how much of a return should I be looking for to build the bankroll. I'm starting with $1000 and want to get to $100,000 so that I can just go for say $5000 a week but I don't want to wait for years to build it up.



If we assume the payout is really 1:1, then the math is pretty easy. You should wager (PW-L)/P=%-of-bankroll-wagered, where P is the payout (P:1), W is the probability of winning, and L is the probability of losing. So, if you can pick with 60% accuracy and a 1:1 payout, then you should wager ((1*.6)-.4)/1=20% of your bankroll on each race.
"So as the clock ticked and the day passed, opportunity met preparation, and luck happened." - Maurice Clarett
adamhubert
adamhubert
  • Threads: 1
  • Posts: 3
Joined: Aug 24, 2010
August 24th, 2010 at 12:04:44 PM permalink
That sounds interesting but I had a 5 bet loosing streak last week. My strategy then was go for 5% and if i lost - my next bet would be for 5% + what i lost + the 5% I didn't win. As you can imagine it got out of hand quickly and i chickened out. took me like 2 days to recover most of it and still not quite there.
Lote
Lote
  • Threads: 1
  • Posts: 29
Joined: May 20, 2010
August 24th, 2010 at 1:48:39 PM permalink
You recalculate what you bet after each bet. So if you win, your next bet would be at 44% of your original bankroll. If you lost it would be at 16% of your original bankroll. A five loss losing streak has a 1% chance of happening and it would put you at about 33% of your orignal bankroll.

You probably are overestimating your edge on horse racing so its closer to 55%.

This is all explained under the wikipedia article on Kelly Betting.

Edit: Also as a counterpoint, if you truly have a 60% edge, then a 5 win win streak would multiply your bankroll by 2.5 but have a nearly 8%! chance of happening. If you ran equally lucky with regards to those five races, you would have won 9 in a row and increased your bankroll by a factor of 5.1.
thecesspit
thecesspit
  • Threads: 53
  • Posts: 5936
Joined: Apr 19, 2010
August 24th, 2010 at 2:23:36 PM permalink
Quote: adamhubert

That sounds interesting but I had a 5 bet loosing streak last week. My strategy then was go for 5% and if i lost - my next bet would be for 5% + what i lost + the 5% I didn't win. As you can imagine it got out of hand quickly and i chickened out. took me like 2 days to recover most of it and still not quite there.



Your chasing the loss, expecting the next bet to be the one you get right... did you think it was more likely? Probably not, yet your placing more importance on that result than the previous bet. Not a good plan...

If I were you, I'd bet around 5-10% of my current bank roll each time.. if you have the edge you actually do. If you over estimated it, then you might need to drop it lower.

You probably don't need to increase your bet until the roll gets up to $1200, just for ease of calculation. At 5% per WINNING bet you need 14 winners to double your roll. That would be 14 more winners than losers, or about 70 races bet on. 1 weeks work by the sounds of it.
"Then you can admire the real gambler, who has neither eaten, slept, thought nor lived, he has so smarted under the scourge of his martingale, so suffered on the rack of his desire for a coup at trente-et-quarante" - Honore de Balzac, 1829
cclub79
cclub79
  • Threads: 35
  • Posts: 1147
Joined: Dec 16, 2009
August 24th, 2010 at 2:48:49 PM permalink
Quote: thecesspit

Your chasing the loss, expecting the next bet to be the one you get right... did you think it was more likely? Probably not, yet your placing more importance on that result than the previous bet. Not a good plan...

If I were you, I'd bet around 5-10% of my current bank roll each time.. if you have the edge you actually do. If you over estimated it, then you might need to drop it lower.

You probably don't need to increase your bet until the roll gets up to $1200, just for ease of calculation. At 5% per WINNING bet you need 14 winners to double your roll. That would be 14 more winners than losers, or about 70 races bet on. 1 weeks work by the sounds of it.



I don't know what tracks you are betting, but unless it's NYRA or Hollywood/Del Mar/Santa Anita, betting more than a few hundred to win will affect your return, and betting in the thousands will definitely lower your odds. Just to throw it out there.
  • Jump to: