It will help just as much as it will hurt so No. Just because a person took a card that they shouldn't have and messes up your hand doesn't make any difference to your strategy, just the result. The chances that you make or lose your hand is exactly the same whether they took the card or not. The only difference is if you are counting cards.
For example, if you see a 4 up and you have a 12 the normal thing to stand. However, if you see a number of 10s come out as a result of the cards you see on the layout and the person next to you decides to his 15 on a two and draw yet another 10, you might feel better hitting that 12 on a four.
Bottom line: Don't let the stupid players bother you. Even if by chance they won that hand and you lost. It could easily have been the other way around.
Excellent answer!!!Quote: derik999The worst thing a stupid player can do is get you frustrated, and this can lead to....
I guess high stakes poker is one solution to avoiding the newbs, but I can't afford it.
In the long run it may help as much as hurt, but one wonders if those who were upset will leave first and those who were too close to the felt may have already left the table. I think that those who allow themselves to become upset by someone else's poor play or someone else's good luck would be better off to have several free drinks instead. Their play will be just as much impaired by the alcohol as by the emotions but it will be more fun to be drunk than to be pissed off at someone's stupidity.Quote: boymimboIt will help just as much as it will hurt...
I guarantee it would be the emptiest table at the casino, of course. But the dealers would refer those annoyed by other players to that table ;)
Oh, hell. It's early Monday morning and my brain isn't fully functioning yet.
Quote: NareedMaybe there should be an "Expert's Table" for BJ at the casinos. I picture the lousiest house rules imaginable, where the 6:5 would be the least of it, but players would have to pass a basic strategy test before being allowed to play.
I guarantee it would be the emptiest table at the casino, of course. But the dealers would refer those annoyed by other players to that table ;)
Oh, hell. It's early Monday morning and my brain isn't fully functioning yet.
There's one. HL tables.
In my opinion, people that do bother about what other people are doing at the Blackjack table should be playing there. I've had once a very aggressive player on the table, betting around 20 times the minimum stake (which most people at the table were playing) and standing when he had f.e. 12 and the dealer had 7.
This guy was getting more and more frustrated when people hit cards, stating that other people should go play outside, was dumb, etc bla bla. He was quite aggressive.
If he thinks it affects his game in the long run, he's the dumbest at the table.
Quote: FleaStiffOften going against Basic Strategy is a vital, exciting and profitable part of the game sometimes prompting a few congratulatory comments from the table. Sure you are playing a hunch and giving into fears at times but when it turns out to be right, it feels good.
true.
In case of a table without CSM it could even be better than basic strategy if you know what you're doing.
But even if not, it's nobody's business how other people play. People pretending they rule the game, but openly admitting they think other people's actions are affecting their game, in the long run, are jokers.
commiserate when that 20 loses to a dealer's 21.
But this you screwed up the natural order of the universe my taking MY card is just utter nonsense
and never much fun.