Quote: SOOPOOLooked at Mazatlan, Waco, Buffalo. None look clear. Going to be lots of disappointment going around.
link to original post
Very, very lucky here in Indy. High clouds. Just about a perfect day.
In my parking lot it got darker than half an hour after sunset. It was surprising to see the light come back so fast with only a few per cent of a sliver of sun that can't be seen because of clouds. It's supposed to rain soon in the next hour. The news said totality was just over 2 minutes for my town. It was up to 4 minutes in the TV viewing area.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=umFU4VylbSk
Quote: ams288I’m somewhere in the gulf on a cruise. Captain came on and said our coverage is 67.3%. People are passing around glasses on the pool deck to look at it. Pretty cool to look directly at it with the glasses, but if you didn’t know there was an eclipse happening there would be no difference without them.
link to original post
If I was on vacation in the Caribbean or Gulf I would be upset to lose an hour or two of sun.
Quote: DRich
If I was on vacation in the Caribbean or Gulf I would be upset to lose an hour or two of sun.
link to original post
We had over 90% coverage where I live. It was still impossible to look directly at it and the light barely dimmed. I don't think your vacation would be ruined at all. Even at 100% coverage, you'd lose maybe four minutes of sun, tops.
Quote: gordonm888We were supposed to have 23% coverage in Knoxville. Instead we had a total eclipse by the clouds. We saw absolutely nothing.
link to original post
Picture or it didn't happen.
Er, not happen.
Quote: MDawgQuote: gordonm888We were supposed to have 23% coverage in Knoxville. Instead we had a total eclipse by the clouds. We saw absolutely nothing.
link to original post
Picture or it didn't happen.
Er, not happen.
link to original post
I happened to be in the area as well.
The sun was slightly less intense than usual for about an hour, I think.
Quote: gordonm888We were supposed to have 23% coverage in Knoxville. Instead we had a total eclipse by the clouds. We saw absolutely nothing.
link to original post
I like Knoxville, what a great city.
Quote: GialmereI see that those that can afford it are chartering small planes to take them above the clouds.
link to original post
That would be so cool.. fly slowly along the path of totality on a small plane with a glass dome
I think an annular solar eclipse (2017) looks better than a total solar eclipse (2024).
Quote: AitchTheLetterWas north of 80% eclipsed for me. Didn't have glasses but I was out driving while it happened so I wasn't gonna look at the sun. It was noticeably darker but not incredibly darker. I swear it FELT cooler with the less sunlight while outside.
link to original post
i was actually at a store when it happened in my area.
i wasnt planning on see the eclipse at all but i noticed all these people in eclipse glasses looking up.
So i took out my phone and watched the eclipse on the camera app
TDG,Quote: ThatDonGuyQuote: GenoDRPhQuote: 100xOddsWhy is it bad to look directly at an eclipse?
the moon blocks out most of the sun
link to original post
It's bad to look directly at the Sun at all times EXCEPT for the few precious seconds or minutes during totality, when the Moon completely occludes the Sun, leaving only the Sun's corona visible. Even when the Sun is 99% blocked, the direct rays can still damage unshielded eyeballs. So it's dangerous to look at the eclipse while it's in progress, except during totality,
link to original post
A long time ago (I think it was during the 1970 eclipse), I thought I heard that it had more to do with how infrared rays somehow bounce off the moon's surface, which is why you could wear welder's glasses at the time to look at just the sun, but even that was dangerous during a total eclipse.
link to original post
Late, of course, but still good to keep in the brainpan.
Infrared has nothing to do with it. Infrared is by definition on the low-energy end of the spectrum. The reflectivity of the Moon (or albedo) is just 0.136, meaning only 13.6 percent of the light that hits the Moon is reflected; the rest is absorbed or scattered. So it can't be anything coming off the Moons surface that is dangerous to your eyes. If it were so, the Full Moon would melt everyone's eyes.
No, unfiltered light from the surface of the sun is just plain bad news to your retina. Retinal doctors have reported in the past on the damages that peoples' retinas have suffered as a result of looking at partial eclipses. It's very specific and unmistakable: little dark crescents burned into the retina itself from people staring at the Sun. Two reasons make this time particularly dangerous: the time around totality has a marked decrease in the sun's light, which not only opens the pupil of the eye, allowing more light in, and the 'darkness' all around convince people to look at the still-dangerous sun. Thus, they get little crescent blind spots in their visual field for the rest of their lives.
Quote: AitchTheLetterWas north of 80% eclipsed for me. Didn't have glasses but I was out driving while it happened so I wasn't gonna look at the sun. It was noticeably darker but not incredibly darker. I swear it FELT cooler with the less sunlight while outside.
link to original post
Temperature absolute drops during an eclipse. Last time I went to Oregon and experienced the totality. It got dark, birds stopped singing and yes, the temperature dropped. I don't recall exactly how much though recently I've read it can drop up to 10 freedom degrees.
This time it was rather anticlimactic. ~20% eclipse and rainy == no observable change.
Spectacular.
Now, do we have a topic for the Iceland-Spain eclipse in 2026, or the Straits of Messina/Rock of Gibraltar eclipse in 2027?
I just looked at the GOES X-Ray Flux page, and the strongest flare for the afternoon of 8 April was C1.0--far too small for any kind of naked-eye 'flare'. What you and I saw (It was quite orange to me) was a solar prominence. Good article about this at SpaceWeather.com for a higher resolution picture, as well as a great GIF of the shadow of the Moon racing along the eclipse track from a GOES weather satellite.Quote: MentalThere were several prominent solar flares. The flare at 6:30 in the image was extremely bright and easily visible to the naked eye during totality. It appears pink here, but orange to the naked eye. I also caught a soaring bird in this image.
link to original post
Quote: BillHasRetiredTDG,Quote: ThatDonGuyQuote: GenoDRPhQuote: 100xOddsWhy is it bad to look directly at an eclipse?
the moon blocks out most of the sun
link to original post
It's bad to look directly at the Sun at all times EXCEPT for the few precious seconds or minutes during totality, when the Moon completely occludes the Sun, leaving only the Sun's corona visible. Even when the Sun is 99% blocked, the direct rays can still damage unshielded eyeballs. So it's dangerous to look at the eclipse while it's in progress, except during totality,
link to original post
A long time ago (I think it was during the 1970 eclipse), I thought I heard that it had more to do with how infrared rays somehow bounce off the moon's surface, which is why you could wear welder's glasses at the time to look at just the sun, but even that was dangerous during a total eclipse.
link to original post
Late, of course, but still good to keep in the brainpan.
Infrared has nothing to do with it. Infrared is by definition on the low-energy end of the spectrum. The reflectivity of the Moon (or albedo) is just 0.136, meaning only 13.6 percent of the light that hits the Moon is reflected; the rest is absorbed or scattered. So it can't be anything coming off the Moons surface that is dangerous to your eyes. If it were so, the Full Moon would melt everyone's eyes.
No, unfiltered light from the surface of the sun is just plain bad news to your retina. Retinal doctors have reported in the past on the damages that peoples' retinas have suffered as a result of looking at partial eclipses. It's very specific and unmistakable: little dark crescents burned into the retina itself from people staring at the Sun. Two reasons make this time particularly dangerous: the time around totality has a marked decrease in the sun's light, which not only opens the pupil of the eye, allowing more light in, and the 'darkness' all around convince people to look at the still-dangerous sun. Thus, they get little crescent blind spots in their visual field for the rest of their lives.
link to original post
It's extremely rare that anyone looks at the eclipse long enough to get any damage - very few cases each eclipse.
The next day if you're trying to decide if you looked at the sun too long, then you did not. You would know it's not some subtle thing that you would not notice. For most people if they look at the sun directly at all during an eclipse it would be just by accident while setting up whatever it was they were trying to use to view it or take pictures.
Who hasn't looked directly at the sun at some point in his life?
The so-called diamond ring as the sun reemerges is such a fleeting and dramatic phenomena. It is almost impossible to capture with a camera because the exposure changes in an instant, yet the image will stay in my mind for a long time.
Quote: ChumpChangeHow the eclipse looks from a satellite's view.
link to original post
wow.. looks like a black hole opened up in the Earth, about to suck everything into it like in the movies.
Life is stranger than fiction
Nobody has reported seeing the comet, nor am I seeing photos online showing the eclipse and the comet at the same time. I thought that was possible, maybe not.
Quote: ChumpChangeHow the eclipse looks from a satellite's view.
link to original post
That looks like a black hole. Are we sure this isn't where the LHC/CERN once was?
/S
Great image!
Quote: MukkeQuote: ChumpChangeHow the eclipse looks from a satellite's view.
link to original post
That looks like a black hole. Are we sure this isn't where the LHC/CERN once was?
/S
Great image!
link to original post
Once was?
It's still operating.
It re-opened in 2022 after it's near Earth destroying accident that almost released the God particle in 2018 that they managed to keep a secret from everyone except those with /TinFoilHats
Quote: GenoDRPhHad an abolsutely glorious and spectacular view from my cousin's front porch in Stowe, Vermont. Not a cloud in the sky, in the 50, friends and family around and a a front row seat for one of nature's greatest spectacles!
link to original post
Did you visit the von Trapp Lodge? I want to take my family there this summer but probably won't have time on our NE swing.
Quote: smoothgrhQuote: GenoDRPhHad an abolsutely glorious and spectacular view from my cousin's front porch in Stowe, Vermont. Not a cloud in the sky, in the 50, friends and family around and a a front row seat for one of nature's greatest spectacles!
link to original post
Did you visit the von Trapp Lodge? I want to take my family there this summer but probably won't have time on our NE swing.
link to original post
No I didn't. This vist was a hit-and-run for me. But, if you want, I can call my cousin and get a scouting report for you.
I'm damned if that last one doesn't look like it's showing a solar flareQuote: JohnnyQMy brother has a cool, high tech telescope and we got some great ( imho ) pix:
link to original post
And Greenland/Iceland/Spain for the total eclipse in Aug 2026? (Note: It's short at between 1 to 2 min)
My brother called in a "Solar Prominence".Quote: odiousgambitI'm damned if that last one doesn't look like it's showing a solar flare
https://www.nasa.gov/image-article/what-solar-prominence/
Hey, who says this sight is not educational ? Hahaha.
Quote: JohnnyQMy brother called in a "Solar Prominence".Quote: odiousgambitI'm damned if that last one doesn't look like it's showing a solar flare
https://www.nasa.gov/image-article/what-solar-prominence/
Hey, who says this sight is not educational ? Hahaha.
link to original post
Looks like a small person moving a big disc to block out the sun.
Also, amazing pic. Looks like an annular eclipse with the ring of fire around the moon
Quote: 100xOddsSo who's going to visit Antarctica for the annular eclipse in Feb 2026?
link to original post
Well, there certainly won't be any flat earthers there since they don't believe it's legal to travel to Antarctica.
Unless we actually looked at the sun, we really couldn't tell any difference until about 20 minutes before totality. Then, it steadily became darker and noticeably cooler. Once totality hit, we saw bats (and bugs!) emerge and start flying around. I had heard that the birds would stop chirping, but found that the opposite to be true. The birds had been silent up until just before totality, and then started chirping. We listened for crickets, but didn't hear any.
We could see Venus even before totality, and once totality hit, we could also see Jupiter.
Unfortunately, with no equipment other than our phones, neither I nor Mrs. J got any pictures that would rival what has already been posted here.
It may be the fact that it was so far from a big city, or the fact that we arrived on Saturday and left on Tuesday, but we saw NONE of the predicted crowds/traffic/shortages at all.
The was by far the best of my 3 recent eclipse experiences -- the total eclipse we saw from in NC in 2017 (which was hindered by weather), and the annular eclipse last October we viewed from UT, being the other 2.
Finally, I'd like to personally thank the Wizard for his posts (and ubiquitous poll entries) mentioning this eclipse (and the one in 2017). Not only did they keep the eclipse in my consciousness, but posting them them so far in advance, allowed me to plan accordingly. Thanks, Mike! I'll be expecting similar posts in advance of the 2045 eclipse! ;)
Quote: JoemanFinally, I'd like to personally thank the Wizard for his posts (and ubiquitous poll entries) mentioning this eclipse (and the one in 2017). Not only did they keep the eclipse in my consciousness, but posting them them so far in advance, allowed me to plan accordingly. Thanks, Mike! I'll be expecting similar posts in advance of the 2045 eclipse! ;)
link to original post
Speaking of which, where is the Wiz?
I expected him to post on the day of the event.
it's now 2days after and he's still mia.
?
Ditto !Quote: Joeman.....we saw NONE of the predicted crowds/traffic/shortages at all.
The previous day, there were temporary signs on the interstate saying that stopping on the shoulder was not allowed. I'm not sure what it looked like there during the eclipse. Other highway signs said something like "Eclipse on 04/08, Plan Ahead".
Quote: 100xOddsQuote: JoemanFinally, I'd like to personally thank the Wizard for his posts (and ubiquitous poll entries) mentioning this eclipse (and the one in 2017). Not only did they keep the eclipse in my consciousness, but posting them them so far in advance, allowed me to plan accordingly. Thanks, Mike! I'll be expecting similar posts in advance of the 2045 eclipse! ;)
link to original post
Speaking of which, where is the Wiz?
I expected him to post on the day of the event.
it's now 2days after and he's still mia.
?
link to original post
He generally does not post until he returns from his trips.
Quote: 100xOddsSo who's going to visit Antarctica for the annular eclipse in Feb 2026?
And Greenland/Iceland/Spain for the total eclipse in Aug 2026? (Note: It's short at between 1 to 2 min)
link to original post
Pumped for an eclipse party on Ibiza!
Quote: 100xOddsSo who's going to visit Antarctica for the annular eclipse in Feb 2026?
And Greenland/Iceland/Spain for the total eclipse in Aug 2026? (Note: It's short at between 1 to 2 min)
link to original post
Pumped for an eclipse party on Ibiza!