Poll

22 votes (61.11%)
14 votes (38.88%)

36 members have voted

NicksGamingStuff
NicksGamingStuff
  • Threads: 50
  • Posts: 858
Joined: Feb 2, 2010
August 11th, 2010 at 9:20:14 PM permalink
If the cockroach was just chillin next to the painting, sure I would take it outside.
mkl654321
mkl654321
  • Threads: 65
  • Posts: 3412
Joined: Aug 8, 2010
August 11th, 2010 at 9:22:55 PM permalink
Quote: RaleighCraps

life before objects has to draw a line somewhere, might just as well be the cockroach.
Sorry Louis LeBeau (this is too easy of a reference to be called obscure).

Who wants to be first to answer the show, actor, and the character name and actor of the person who used the term?
No responding if you have to look it up!

And for the record, mice and rats would also not merit saving.



Wasn't he the French guy on Hogan's Heroes? LeBeau was the name of the character, but I have no idea who the actor was. LeBeau could keep the camp's German shepherds quiet, and could cook pretty well, and was short, but other than that, I know nothing...nothing...
The fact that a believer is happier than a skeptic is no more to the point than the fact that a drunken man is happier than a sober one. The happiness of credulity is a cheap and dangerous quality.---George Bernard Shaw
Toes14
Toes14
  • Threads: 18
  • Posts: 455
Joined: May 6, 2010
August 11th, 2010 at 9:26:26 PM permalink
Cat's aren't allowed in Museums, so I'd take the painting since the cat is breaking the rules! (FYI - I have 3 cats)
"Bite my Glorious Golden Ass!" - Bender Bending Rodriguez
cclub79
cclub79
  • Threads: 35
  • Posts: 1147
Joined: Dec 16, 2009
August 11th, 2010 at 9:28:37 PM permalink
Quote: RaleighCraps

life before objects has to draw a line somewhere, might just as well be the cockroach.

And for the record, mice and rats would also not merit saving.



Exactly. And there's nothing hypocritical about that. The painting people drew the line at (presumably) human life. We just lowered it to just above rodents. Everyone has the line somewhere.
Wizard
Administrator
Wizard
  • Threads: 1491
  • Posts: 26435
Joined: Oct 14, 2009
August 11th, 2010 at 11:30:17 PM permalink
Quote: cclub79

Exactly. And there's nothing hypocritical about that. The painting people drew the line at (presumably) human life. We just lowered it to just above rodents. Everyone has the line somewhere.



Maybe it is art itself that helps us to draw the line between cat and rodent. You see a lot more of the former in paintings than the latter.
"For with much wisdom comes much sorrow." -- Ecclesiastes 1:18 (NIV)
rxwine
rxwine
  • Threads: 209
  • Posts: 12166
Joined: Feb 28, 2010
August 12th, 2010 at 12:27:37 AM permalink
Okay, here's my answer.

Rescue the painting.

If anyone asked me about the cat, I'd tell them, "I told him to run for it."
There's no secret. Just know what you're talking about before you open your mouth.
FleaStiff
FleaStiff
  • Threads: 265
  • Posts: 14484
Joined: Oct 19, 2009
August 12th, 2010 at 2:45:32 AM permalink
In all seriousness:

I am a mass murderer who happens to be a lifelong cat lover and would indeed attempt to rescue the cat despite its desires to run, hide or scratch and bite a rescuer. I'm not particularly fond of dogs but would probably try to rescue one anyway. I would definitely make no attempt to rescue a mouse, rat, cockroach, etc.

I am not particularly appreciative of art and have mostly lived amidst barren walls but have attended various gallery openings or other art shows and derived some enjoyment from such events. I would probably try to rescue the art as well but would surely rescue the cat first.

I would never be a fireman probably because I lack sufficient altruism but also because I could never tolerate the regimentation or the co-workers.

We all draw lines and most of them are indeed somewhat arbitrary and capricious and often do not withstand close examination even in hypothetical scenarios.
DJTeddyBear
DJTeddyBear
  • Threads: 207
  • Posts: 10992
Joined: Nov 2, 2009
August 12th, 2010 at 4:52:46 AM permalink
Quote: cclub79

Quote: DJTeddyBear

That's all well and good, but it's also the result of all those countless hours of training.

The original question was posed to ordinary people. The same type of people would would be running out of the burning building while the firefighter is running in.

But he said suppose you are a firefighter. That's what I did. I never had countless hours of training as a firefighter, yet I know how they prioritize.



I completely missed the part in the original question, "Suppose you are a firefighter."

Thanks for pointing that out.

Can I change my vote?

CAT. No doubt about it.
I invented a few casino games. Info: http://www.DaveMillerGaming.com/ ————————————————————————————————————— Superstitions are silly, childish, irrational rituals, born out of fear of the unknown. But how much does it cost to knock on wood? 😁
FinsRule
FinsRule
  • Threads: 128
  • Posts: 3914
Joined: Dec 23, 2009
August 12th, 2010 at 4:57:02 AM permalink
Quote: FleaStiff

In all seriousness:

I am a mass murderer who happens to be a lifelong cat lover and would indeed attempt to rescue the cat despite its desires to run, hide or scratch and bite a rescuer. I'm not particularly fond of dogs but would probably try to rescue one anyway. I would definitely make no attempt to rescue a mouse, rat, cockroach, etc.

I am not particularly appreciative of art and have mostly lived amidst barren walls but have attended various gallery openings or other art shows and derived some enjoyment from such events. I would probably try to rescue the art as well but would surely rescue the cat first.

I would never be a fireman probably because I lack sufficient altruism but also because I could never tolerate the regimentation or the co-workers.

We all draw lines and most of them are indeed somewhat arbitrary and capricious and often do not withstand close examination even in hypothetical scenarios.




You're a mass murderer?
cclub79
cclub79
  • Threads: 35
  • Posts: 1147
Joined: Dec 16, 2009
August 12th, 2010 at 5:06:25 AM permalink
Quote: FinsRule

You're a mass murderer?



+1 on being a little weirded out when I read that line.
Doc
Doc
  • Threads: 46
  • Posts: 7287
Joined: Feb 27, 2010
August 12th, 2010 at 6:55:43 AM permalink
Quote: FinsRule

You're a mass murderer?

Yeah, and how do you murder a Catholic service anyway? By fumbling the Latin?

As for the original question, I think my action would likely be to get myself killed chasing after that stupid cat.
mkl654321
mkl654321
  • Threads: 65
  • Posts: 3412
Joined: Aug 8, 2010
August 12th, 2010 at 12:15:06 PM permalink
Quote: cclub79

+1 on being a little weirded out when I read that line.



He works for Orkin. Remember, this thread devolved into a debate over which kinds of life were worth saving. It's probable that he has the blood of millions of cockroaches on his hands.
The fact that a believer is happier than a skeptic is no more to the point than the fact that a drunken man is happier than a sober one. The happiness of credulity is a cheap and dangerous quality.---George Bernard Shaw
cclub79
cclub79
  • Threads: 35
  • Posts: 1147
Joined: Dec 16, 2009
August 12th, 2010 at 3:42:13 PM permalink
From the episode of The Office that was JUST on TBS:

Andy: I'll drop an ethics bomb on you. Would you steal bread to feed your family? ... Boom!
Dwight: It's a trick question. The bread is poisoned. Also, it's not your real family. You've been cuckolded by a stronger, smarter male.
Andy: No that's... not how it works.
Michael: I would not... steal the bread. And I would not let my family go hungry.
Wizard
Administrator
Wizard
  • Threads: 1491
  • Posts: 26435
Joined: Oct 14, 2009
August 12th, 2010 at 4:22:10 PM permalink
Quote: cclub79


Dwight: It's a trick question. The bread is poisoned. Also, it's not your real family. You've been cuckolded by a stronger, smarter male.



Sounds like the kind of comment that has been made here several times already.
"For with much wisdom comes much sorrow." -- Ecclesiastes 1:18 (NIV)
Nareed
Nareed
  • Threads: 373
  • Posts: 11413
Joined: Nov 11, 2009
August 12th, 2010 at 4:32:55 PM permalink
Quote: Wizard

Sounds like the kind of comment that has been made here several times already.



Indeed.

On the other hand, that's the plot of Les Misserables by Victor Hugo.

My beef is that ethical questions are too complicated and requrie much more than a mere rhethorical question. Also ethics do change between normal times and emergencies; therfore these lifeboat/fire/desert scenarios are not a good basis for the discussion of ethics.
Donald Trump is a fucking criminal
98Clubs
98Clubs
  • Threads: 52
  • Posts: 1728
Joined: Jun 3, 2010
August 12th, 2010 at 6:51:13 PM permalink
The painting is an original and cannot be replaced with a duplicate genuine.
However, copies abound that can be hung in place... A lost masterpiece.

Presuming the cat will die if left behind, saving the cat is saving a life.

The age old question of Whats a life worth?... any life.

Spare the cat and spoil the riches sez I. arrrrr.

Besides, the fireman might be sworn to save a life when possible, if possible.
MOOT POLL therefore... the cat is saved by sworn oath alone!

Now about that diamond collar said cat is wearing.....

98Clubs
Some people need to reimagine their thinking.
mkl654321
mkl654321
  • Threads: 65
  • Posts: 3412
Joined: Aug 8, 2010
August 12th, 2010 at 8:11:32 PM permalink
Quote: Nareed


My beef is that ethical questions are too complicated and requrie much more than a mere rhethorical question. Also ethics do change between normal times and emergencies; therfore these lifeboat/fire/desert scenarios are not a good basis for the discussion of ethics.



Actually, such discussions are useful because they uncover people's inclinations, and you need an element of abstraction to get a true reading of those. The very fact that ethical questions ARE murky in real life doesn't make an intellectual exercise invalid. I would very strongly disagree that ethics do change, or should change, in times of emergency--such times are when ethics often prove indispensible. Also, having considered potential ethical dilemmas beforehand, using thought exercises such as we have been discussing, can help us apply ethics to those emergency situations when they do arise--rather than having to come up with the "answers" cold turkey, and under stress to boot.
The fact that a believer is happier than a skeptic is no more to the point than the fact that a drunken man is happier than a sober one. The happiness of credulity is a cheap and dangerous quality.---George Bernard Shaw
Wizard
Administrator
Wizard
  • Threads: 1491
  • Posts: 26435
Joined: Oct 14, 2009
August 12th, 2010 at 8:43:22 PM permalink
Quote: mkl654321

Actually, such discussions are useful because they uncover people's inclinations, and you need an element of abstraction to get a true reading of those. The very fact that ethical questions ARE murky in real life doesn't make an intellectual exercise invalid. I would very strongly disagree that ethics do change, or should change, in times of emergency--such times are when ethics often prove indispensible. Also, having considered potential ethical dilemmas beforehand, using thought exercises such as we have been discussing, can help us apply ethics to those emergency situations when they do arise--rather than having to come up with the "answers" cold turkey, and under stress to boot.



Amen, brother! Very well said. It is hard to have a good discussion about ethics and philosophy without posing a hypothetical question to sink your teeth into. I think it is the easy way out to ridicule the question. Ultimately, this does come down to the question of what a life is worth, as you said. I'm not saying there is a right or wrong answer about whether the life of a cat is worth more than a painting worth in the millions. What I do like to see is an answer on either side, backed up with a good argument.
"For with much wisdom comes much sorrow." -- Ecclesiastes 1:18 (NIV)
bluefire
bluefire
  • Threads: 10
  • Posts: 156
Joined: May 24, 2010
August 12th, 2010 at 9:35:23 PM permalink
Quote: mkl654321

Actually, such discussions are useful because they uncover people's inclinations, and you need an element of abstraction to get a true reading of those. The very fact that ethical questions ARE murky in real life doesn't make an intellectual exercise invalid. I would very strongly disagree that ethics do change, or should change, in times of emergency--such times are when ethics often prove indispensible. Also, having considered potential ethical dilemmas beforehand, using thought exercises such as we have been discussing, can help us apply ethics to those emergency situations when they do arise--rather than having to come up with the "answers" cold turkey, and under stress to boot.



Now that I can get behind! Nice post.
bluefire
bluefire
  • Threads: 10
  • Posts: 156
Joined: May 24, 2010
August 12th, 2010 at 9:36:47 PM permalink
Quote: Wizard

Amen, brother! Very well said. It is hard to have a good discussion about ethics and philosophy without posing a hypothetical question to sink your teeth into. I think it is the easy way out to ridicule the question. Ultimately, this does come down to the question of what a life is worth, as you said. I'm not saying there is a right or wrong answer about whether the life of a cat is worth more than a painting worth in the millions. What I do like to see is an answer on either side, backed up with a good argument.



Does "I'm selfish and generally feel a stronger emotional connection to cats than rembrandt" count? :P
mkl654321
mkl654321
  • Threads: 65
  • Posts: 3412
Joined: Aug 8, 2010
August 12th, 2010 at 9:48:00 PM permalink
Quote: bluefire

Does "I'm selfish and generally feel a stronger emotional connection to cats than rembrandt" count? :P



That's kind of the problem, though, isn't it? Our emotional connections/biases should have, ideally, no influence on our ethical decisions. It's sort of like the ACLU defending Nazis--they feel that free speech is free speech, even if that speech disgusts us. That's one of the reasons I LOVED the movie, "The Dark Knight"--there were so many questions of moral ambiguity. The upshot is that APPLIED ethics is a whole different animal than ethics per se. That concept often gets misrespresented via the term "situational ethics", which is a self-canceling phrase if ever I heard one.

That said, if I was that fireman, and the choice was between the Rembrandt and my ex-wife, not only would I unhesitatingly grab the painting, but I would trip her as she tried to escape. (Too bad this is only another exercise in the hypothetical.)
The fact that a believer is happier than a skeptic is no more to the point than the fact that a drunken man is happier than a sober one. The happiness of credulity is a cheap and dangerous quality.---George Bernard Shaw
bluefire
bluefire
  • Threads: 10
  • Posts: 156
Joined: May 24, 2010
August 12th, 2010 at 10:16:37 PM permalink
Quote: mkl654321

That's kind of the problem, though, isn't it? Our emotional connections/biases should have, ideally, no influence on our ethical decisions. It's sort of like the ACLU defending Nazis--they feel that free speech is free speech, even if that speech disgusts us. That's one of the reasons I LOVED the movie, "The Dark Knight"--there were so many questions of moral ambiguity. The upshot is that APPLIED ethics is a whole different animal than ethics per se. That concept often gets misrespresented via the term "situational ethics", which is a self-canceling phrase if ever I heard one.

That said, if I was that fireman, and the choice was between the Rembrandt and my ex-wife, not only would I unhesitatingly grab the painting, but I would trip her as she tried to escape. (Too bad this is only another exercise in the hypothetical.)



lol @ ex-wife.

Yeah, I agree that my statement was taking the easy way out and shouldn't really play any part in the decision. If I was to be completely unbiased about it, I think I'd have to choose the Rembrandt, as it would have the potential to bring joy to thousands of people whereas the Cat would never have that much of an impact.

Still, I like being selfish. ;)

"Situational Ethics"? Most of my philosophy background is political, and the first thing that comes to mind when you say that is Nietzsche.
mkl654321
mkl654321
  • Threads: 65
  • Posts: 3412
Joined: Aug 8, 2010
August 12th, 2010 at 10:22:33 PM permalink
Quote: bluefire


"Situational Ethics"? Most of my philosophy background is political, and the first thing that comes to mind when you say that is Nietzsche.



And the first thing that comes to mind when you say "Nietzche" is (besides "Gesundheit!") is Otto in "A Fish Called Wanda":

Otto: Don't call me stupid!

Wendy: Why on earth not?

(Otto was a student of Nietzsche.)
The fact that a believer is happier than a skeptic is no more to the point than the fact that a drunken man is happier than a sober one. The happiness of credulity is a cheap and dangerous quality.---George Bernard Shaw
bluefire
bluefire
  • Threads: 10
  • Posts: 156
Joined: May 24, 2010
August 12th, 2010 at 10:45:17 PM permalink
Quote: mkl654321

And the first thing that comes to mind when you say "Nietzche" is (besides "Gesundheit!") is Otto in "A Fish Called Wanda":

Otto: Don't call me stupid!

Wendy: Why on earth not?

(Otto was a student of Nietzsche.)



I've never seen that movie, but after looking it up since that comment, it looks absolutely hilarious. Just added to the netflix queue.
mkl654321
mkl654321
  • Threads: 65
  • Posts: 3412
Joined: Aug 8, 2010
August 13th, 2010 at 12:18:52 AM permalink
IMHO, the three funniest movies ever made:

1. Monty Python and the Holy Grail (no contest)
2. Life of Brian (also Monty Python)
3. A Fish Called Wanda (featuring most of the Monty Python cast)
The fact that a believer is happier than a skeptic is no more to the point than the fact that a drunken man is happier than a sober one. The happiness of credulity is a cheap and dangerous quality.---George Bernard Shaw
  • Jump to: