Quote: wellwellwellAs of 11/3 NTEK had 1.566 billion outstanding.
As simply a general question, what are the reasons a company would issue this many shares?
Quote: WizardAs simply a general question, what are the reasons a company would issue this many shares?
In the Facebook movie they did something similar. It diluted the ownership of the previous majority share holders to make a new majority. I believe that is what happened anyways
Quote: WizardAs simply a general question, what are the reasons a company would issue this many shares?
You must realize these companies aren't audited, regulated by the SEC kind of companies. They can't issue shares like SEC companies.
Over on the NTEK/NTGL thread started by Mr. V, I explained the process and how many shares NTEK has issued in the past 10 months.
To answer your question directly there doesn't appear to be a valid answer, and it appears the company itself is seeing very little of the proceeds from the share issuances.
Quote: WizardAs simply a general question, what are the reasons a company would issue this many shares?
For a small penny stock company they will sell shares to raise cash or pay debts. Generally these companies have very little operating capital and when the bank account gets close to zero they will issue and sell X new shares at a price slightly below market value to give themselves more operating cash. Obviously each time they do this it dilutes current stockholders and there really isn't any recourse. If they don't sell more stock the company goes out of business and the shareholders get nothing.
A lot of people say that penny stock companies sell more stock than they do goods and services. With penny stocks it is easy to sell people dreams.
Quote: DRichFor a small penny stock company they will sell shares to raise cash or pay debts. Generally these companies have very little operating capital and when the bank account gets close to zero they will issue and sell X new shares at a price slightly below market value to give themselves more operating cash. Obviously each time they do this it dilutes current stockholders and there really isn't any recourse. If they don't sell more stock the company goes out of business and the shareholders get nothing.
A lot of people say that penny stock companies sell more stock than they do goods and services. With penny stocks it is easy to sell people dreams.
Not true DRich. To sell stock as you described the company has to file a registration statement outlining all the details of the stock being sold. NTEK is not a SEC reporting company and is unaudited so they could never file a registration statement.
NTEK kind of companies can only issue shares for debt aged one year or older. They can borrow from toxic convertible financiers but those shares are issued at a huge discount to the market price. Google Rule 144.
Quote: wellwellwellNot true DRich. To sell stock as you described the company has to file a registration statement outlining all the details of the stock being sold. NTEK is not a SEC reporting company and is unaudited so they could never file a registration statement.
NTEK kind of companies can only issue shares for debt aged one year or older. They can borrow from toxic convertible financiers but those shares are issued at a huge discount to the market price. Google Rule 144.
First of all, I want to make it clear that I didn't say that NTEK did any of this.
Technically, you are probably correct. The company I used to work for would find an investor to "loan" money that was collateralized by shares of stock. In our case the loans were never repaid and the investor would end up with the stock. I couldn't even try to explain the underlying details of the transactions.
First let me say that I'm embarrassed to have to ask these questions. I studied economics in college but never learned anything practical from it.
So, let me say that I find it totally unethical to current stock holders to issue new stock out of thin air. The old stockholders should either agree to it or be fairly compensated for their smaller share of the company.
Yes, I saw "The Social Network." As I recall, the guy who got diluted did sign something agreeing to it, although he was trusting the advice of a dishonest attorney.
Is my understanding correct? If so, why would anybody buy a share in anything knowing that share could get diluted at the will of the company? Does this happen often? I've played the stock market and don't recall my share values ever dropping precariously overnight due to a dilution.
Quote: WizardIs my understanding correct? If so, why would anybody buy a share in anything knowing that share could get diluted at the will of the company? Does this happen often? I've played the stock market and don't recall my share values ever dropping precariously overnight due to a dilution.
When something like this happens the argument is that the shareholder is not necessarily diluted. They own a smaller percentage of the company but the company has gained an asset so therefore the company is more valuable.
This happens often when companies buy each other. Company 1 will offer X number of shares to the shareholders of Company 2 in lieu of cash. Although the shareholders of Company 1 now own a smaller piece of Company 1, Company 1 is now more valuable because it has all the assets of Company 2.
The theory is that the stock price will fluctuate to match the value of the company.
is often part of a scheme called 'pump
and dump'.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microcap_stock_fraud#Pump_and_dump
Quote: DRichWhen something like this happens the argument is that the shareholder is not necessarily diluted. They own a smaller percentage of the company but the company has gained an asset so therefore the company is more valuable.
Good point. Are there laws to enforce that dilutions are doing for just cause?
Quote: EvenBobDiluting with 10's of millions of shares
is often part of a scheme called 'pump
and dump'.
I'm not saying you're wrong but I thought most pump and dumps were buying into a questionable stock and combining it with a lot of hype about how it is growing, and then those on the inside dumping their shares at a huge profit.
Is it bad that my references come from movies?
They issue stock to raise money. If they are careful with how much they issue, they won't hurt their stock price much. For some companies in high demand, it is almost like a second IPO, with people clammoring to get a piece and the stock price actually rises.
They will also buy back stock in an attempt to raise the stock prices and increase "shareholder value" this can also make investors happy and also increase the price of the stock from that.
While they don't see any money from that kind of move, and really it costs them some cash flow to buy the stock back, it can help "the numbers" which affect your bond rating and how much it costs you to borrow money.
So basically it is to get money and to manipulate the stock price, whichever is more advantageous to them at the time.
Companies issue shares to raise capital to fund their operations. Equity is much cheaper than debt, especially for a microcap company that no one would want to lend to. That said, penny stocks tend to issue a ton of shares because their stock price is so low. A billion shares sounds a lot, but if it trades for for less than 1/10th of a penny, we talking about a mkt cap of a million.
Most penny stocks are she'll companies. Much like most boiler rooms, they have an address, no real employees or customers, utilize boiler room brokers to push their stock price around. Rarely is their real liquidity in the name. When you try to sell with a limit order, it barely executes because a mkt maker will at times voluntarily choose not to execute.
The next part of the typical scam is to hire some famous person to vouch for the company, pump up the price while the smart money gets out, and then either do a reverse split or fail.
God bless capitalism.
Quote: WizardThanks for the above. What I'm wondering now is even if a company were inclined to keep diluting the stock to raise capital, why doesn't it also keep doing reverse splits to keep the stock price looking legitimate. I thought to get off the "pink sheets" the price had to be at least $1.
The exchanges also have a minimum market cap requirement, so a $10m market cap company with a $10 stock price would still be on the "pink sheets".
I guess that is not considered a penny stock.
https://finance.yahoo.com/q/ks?s=BRK-A