You know exactly when you play their $50, and you hit a $200,000 jackpot.
The casino takes $40,000 for taxes (isn't 20% the norm ?), leaving $160,000.
Do you expect your friend to share some of the winnings with you? If so, how much ?
If you were the one who gave the $50, would you share some with the player? If so, how much?
If I was the friend, I would like to think I would give the player $20,000, and would make sure the taxes were completely covered. I hope the greed would not take root on me...............
Quote: RaleighCrapsYou are going to the casino and a friend gives you $50 to put through $5 slots.
You know exactly when you play their $50, and you hit a $200,000 jackpot.
The casino takes $40,000 for taxes (isn't 20% the norm ?), leaving $160,000.
Do you expect your friend to share some of the winnings with you? If so, how much ?
If you were the one who gave the $50, would you share some with the player? If so, how much?
Quite interesting.. I just laid this out for 'gambler' as i am playing his $5 I owe him. The 20% number is a false number. If you are in a top income bracket in New York State you will pay over 40% to our combined friends, the Feds and the State. Just like your employer withholds a certain amount from each check, the final reconcilliation determines your exact tax liability. For me winning $200,000 would be worth around $116,000 or so. I would expect nothing from my friend, but I can't imagine he wouldn't give me something. I am not sure, but I would guess i would give a friend 10% or so if the shoe was on the other foot.
How much did you put into the machine? Unless, the person who gave the $50 specifically said to go to a specific slot and put the $50 in it and play just that machine in that timeframe with only his/her $50, then here is how it should be divided...
You keep everything and tell your friend you lost.... lol just kidding. I would give my friend a direct percentage of what I cumulatively started with...eg, if I had $200 and my friend gave me $50, that would be a total starting kitty of $250. Therefore I would give my friend 20% of winnings minus taxes. I believe that to be fair.
I.E. If I gave someone $5 to play slots for me, or even to put on a Roulette number or pass line or whatever, I kinda expect the response to be, "I think you're gonna lose. Ha ha."
The only exception I would make is for a sports bet where a winner is public knowledge, and a loser will still have proof that the bet was actually placed.
Quote: RaleighCraps
If you were the one who gave the $50, would you share some with the player? If so, how much?
I'd share at least the $50 stake. However, if I were the friend, I wouldn't expect anything further than that, seeing as how the jackpot winner is the one that pulled the handle, and that person deserves the jackpot.
Quote: wschmrdrI'd share at least the $50 stake. However, if I were the friend, I wouldn't expect anything further than that, seeing as how the jackpot winner is the one that pulled the handle, and that person deserves the jackpot.
using that logic if you give someone $50 and tell them to buy you a gizmo, the friend would keep the gizmo!! If you accept the $50 from your friend then the results of the bet are his, not yours. And as far as watch me win's analysis... If you just add the $50 to your bankroll and don't make a separate "this bet is for my friend' play, then, yes, you can give him a percentage of your total bankroll. If someone asks me to do this, I keep their bet separate from mine, and make their bet first....
Hence it is only fair, that you won't win anything if you hit the jackpot. Anyway, it is not your $50 at stake, and hence it is not your win.
You should expect tax expences fully covered, and I would not expect more than 10% of winnings.
Quote: RaleighCrapsYou are going to the casino and a friend gives you $50 to put through $5 slots.
You know exactly when you play their $50, and you hit a $200,000 jackpot.
The casino takes $40,000 for taxes (isn't 20% the norm ?), leaving $160,000.
Do you expect your friend to share some of the winnings with you? If so, how much?
If you were the one who gave the $50, would you share some with the player? If so, how much?
And I get the taxes in my name with none of the bennies? Yeah right! I tell them to forget about it! Guys (or gals) that do this must enjoy flushing money down to toilet.
What if you, on your own, win the $200,000. Then your buddy will always wonder if you screwed him or not. I'd tell them to go buy some lottery tickets and let me enjoy myself!
I live in NY and about 20 years ago, when lotteries were growing, the PA lottery got to $125,000,000. I had to go to PA on business. Friends of mine asked me to buy a total of $150 worth of tickets. So I have to go back to NY with the winning ticket and give it away for $1. I'm glad no one won!
Quote: SOOPOOQuite interesting.. I just laid this out for 'gambler' as i am playing his $5 I owe him. The 20% number is a false number. If you are in a top income bracket in New York State you will pay over 40% to our combined friends, the Feds and the State.....
Yeah, your response to gambler was what prompted this thread. I was trying to factor in the tax issue with my response, but did not portray it correctly, since I used % based on jackpot won, not on the take home amount after taxes. I believe the take home amount from the casino would be 160,000, but as you noted, real taxes would likely be double the $40,000. So real win amount would be somewhere around 120k. 10% or $12k to the player, leaving the $50 friend with a net of $108k, is probably closer to what I proposed. In any event, I would make sure the player had all taxes covered first, then we would parcel out the win.
The wide range of answers so far has been interesting.
I do find it interesting that this forum has such a huge range of what the bettor's commission should be. Some feel that it isn't your money to begin with and therefore no commission is necessary, though it would be nice. Others seem to demand as high as 50% of the profits as a finders fee or action fee.
When I plan a trip to Las Vegas, I normally get approached by friends and family to make a few bets for them. Some give me $20 to play the quarter slots, while others ask for specific craps or roulette bets. It's never for a ton of money, and mostly just for kicks and giggles. In the event that they do win something, I gladly give them their winnings and expect nothing in return. Now, I have never hit a huge life changing jackpot, but after I subtract the money to pay for taxes, I would give them the rest.
Now SooPoo, please wear your luckiest socks on the day that you go to the casino! I would love for us to have the problem of splitting a $1,000,000 jackpot!
Quote: RaleighCrapsYeah, your response to gambler was what prompted this thread. I was trying to factor in the tax issue with my response, but did not portray it correctly, since I used % based on jackpot won, not on the take home amount after taxes. I believe the take home amount from the casino would be 160,000, but as you noted, real taxes would likely be double the $40,000. So real win amount would be somewhere around 120k. 10% or $12k to the player, leaving the $50 friend with a net of $108k, is probably closer to what I proposed. In any event, I would make sure the player had all taxes covered first, then we would parcel out the win.
The wide range of answers so far has been interesting.
Whoever pushes the button/pulls the handle is the person who is credited with the jackpot and therefore is stuck with the taxes. The law is set up this way to prevent the claiming of the jackpot from being made by an individual who would pay the least amount of taxes (should there be more than one person involved in the play.)
Since the jackpot is legally the property of "gambler" and not "loaner", "gambler" can set the terms. Since no terms were set beforehand, I think that a 50-50 split of the jackpot is reasonable. After all, the "loaner" has no real claim on the jackpot. If the net after taxes is 120K...60K each.
If I was the firend, I would, of course expect the full amount - it is MY 50 bucks! After all, if I ask you to buy a gizmo, like somebody mentioned, you would not expect a commission from me would you?
Nobody likes disappointments. And what fun is it to have someone else spin the stupid wheel anyway?
The problem, of course, is what happens if this is actually what happened? Would the friend believe it? Probably not.Quote: weaselmanIf I was the player, I would keep everything, and just tell the "friend" that I lost his $50, and then - can you believe it? - hit the jackpot on the very next spin!
This is why the only "friend" bet I would involve mysef in is a sports bet.
Quote: DJTeddyBearThe problem, of course, is what happens if this is actually what happened? Would the friend believe it? Probably not.
Why would he ask me to bet for him in the first place if he did not trust me? :)
Well, my favorite casino game is craps, and I don't know whether I ever got around to making a specific wager that I identified in advance as "her" $5. Instead, when I got home, I spun a drawn-out and dramatic tale about how I had bet the $5 on the pass line for her, rolled 11 to double her money, decided to keep her in play for another $5 pass bet, set a point of 10, tossed her $5 winnings on a hard 10, rolled half a dozen numbers and finally the double-5. She squealed, and I turned "her" $50 over to her. It was well worth the $45 it cost me, just to watch her thrill in the vicarious winning trip to a casino.
And no, I won't handle a similar wager for you in the same manner.
Seriously, that was a very nice thing for you to do to your friend. The $45 seems worth it to make her smile.
I am a little saddened to hear that some people on this site would cheat their friends out of their money if they did hit a big jackpot with the money that they were given to gamble with. While I understand that legally the person who pulls the slot machine handle when the jackpot is hit has every right to all of the money, it still makes sad that the gentleman's agreement and trust is broken. If they are truly your friend, why are you cheating them?
I would personally have a hard time sleeping at night if I took someone's $5 bet, hit a $20,000 jackpot, and then "claimed" that it was my $5 bet in the first place. Then again, I believe in karma, and I know a lot of people don't.
Even if I promose to be your best friend?Quote: DocAnd no, I won't handle a similar wager for you in the same manner.
---
Ditto what Gambler said.
Then again, since we attribute gambling as an entertainment expense, I'm sure you got your money's worth when fabricating that story.
Ok. My brother did ask me last time to place a bet on some sporting event, but I told him it would be easier for him to try the local sports book. He agreed.
Quote: DJTeddyBearEven if I promose to be your best friend?Quote: DocAnd no, I won't handle a similar wager for you in the same manner.
I've seen your photo, DJ, and you're no where near so cute as she is.
Quote: DJTeddyBearThen again, since we attribute gambling as an entertainment expense, I'm sure you got your money's worth when fabricating that story.
That I did. After making my post above, I remembered that I had teased her just a bit before giving her the $50. I continued the tale by saying her luck seemed to be running so good that I put it all on Aces straight up for the next roll. If it won, she would have had $1,600, but it lost, and the stick man just scooped up the chips. She looked absolutely crushed and shocked for the two seconds that I waited before saying I was kidding about that part.
IIRC, I came out a little ahead at the tables that trip, and I was adding to my fun by sharing a bit of the winnings and spinning yarns. I think she bought it all.
To answer the question, I would give them the full amount minus 40% for taxes. Once I did my taxes I'd calculate a more accurate figure and rebate them the rest. I would expect them to buy my a beer, and if they offered more I'd stick to just wanting a beer. I would, however, take full advantage of writing off my looses for the year and keep that that additional benefit for myself in return for the additional effort of filing the taxes.
Now, if a jackpot of $200,000 came up (or actually anything over $1,200), I would call the friend and tell them that they won, immediately. I would explain to them that I would have to deduct a portion of taxes (40 percent) and would give them 60 percent of the proceeds immediately with the difference payable once the tax return calculation was done. It would be fairly easy to figure out exactly what the tax liability would be based on projections on your income.
You made the bargain to make the bet on behalf of the person. It would be unethical to lie or to not return winnings to the friend. It's up to the friend to make the offer of an additional split. The same goes in reverse. If you lose the $50 but hit a jackpot later on, you don't have any obligation to give your friend any of those winnings (though I would probably give the person back the original bet and tell the friend to come to Vegas with me, next time).
The IRS thinks I've won a $200K jackpot. Now *I* have to pay taxes on that -- and the actual tax bracket for that amount if single is 35%, not 20%, plus state taxes* and various phaseouts for things such as itemized deductions and Roth IRA contributions.
Is there some way to transfer the tax liability to my friend? I could declare a gift to him (and do it in annual installments of $13K if we're worried about the lifetime gift tax exemption), but the IRS would still consider the $200K to be *my* income. Nevada law at least is pretty definitive about the person pushing the button owning the jackpot (and presumably, incurring the tax liability), so there's no help there.
At the very least, my friend owes me enough to cover the taxes on the additional income, plus any cost of hiring a CPA to work this whole mess out.
(*This may be zero if it is considered "Nevada income" -- usually, you are taxed according to the state you earn the income in. Professional athletes, for example, usually have to fill out tax forms for multiple states.)
The player hits the Jackpot for $436,000. Now the arguments start. Does the player owe his friend half of the Jackpot.....two thirds of the Jackpot.....or just 50 cents?
That's what then movie is about. Unfortunately, I don't remember much more about the movie.
Quote: FatGeezusThe player hits the Jackpot for $436,000. Now the arguments start. Does the player owe his friend half of the Jackpot.....two thirds of the Jackpot.....or just 50 cents?
Strictly speaking, fifty cents.
If you get a loan from a bank to launch a business, and in time you make it worth billions, you don't owe the bank more than the amount borrowed and the interest agreed upon.
The difference is that it takes no skill to hit a jackpot, therefore the borrower cannot claim any skill was involved, just luck. But had the lender not lent him fifty cents, he wouldn't have hit the jackpot, at least not for so much. So the decent thing to do is to share at least a significant part of the jackpot with the lender, say no less than 1/3 after taxes.
Quote: FatGeezus"Sour Grapes" was made in 1998. In the movie, two friends are sitting next to each other at the slots. One turns to the other and says "loan me two quarters so I can play all three wheels".
The player hits the Jackpot for $436,000. Now the arguments start. Does the player owe his friend half of the Jackpot.....two thirds of the Jackpot.....or just 50 cents?
That's what then movie is about. Unfortunately, I don't remember much more about the movie.
I think the alternate ending involved a shovel, the trunk of a Lincoln towncar, and a whole lot of desert... hehe