Challenge to AxelWolf the Daddy of All Wagers
Quote: lilredroosternow everybody understands EB - why you're able to beat roulette so easily
you have math abilities that are far beyond those of mortal men
Or the math doesn't matter. I choose
that.
Quote: TomGit is that people who claim to have an advantage when playing all seem to lack the capacity to describe the advantage.
More like lack the willingness,
not lack the capacity.
Quote: odiousgambitHe gave the secret away a long time ago
Quote: EvenBob
All roulette systems work part of the time.
Only play when it's working!!
That's actually good advice
Good on me..
actually this author also released this secret
and believe me it's true
I've walked onto a casino floor with this book in my hand and I saw the Pit Bosses trembling with fear
Quote: lilredrooster
Psycho-biological principals? Is that
like crapping your pants before
you go in so the pit won't come
anywhere near you?
Quote: lilredroosteractually this author also released this secret
and believe me it's true
I've walked onto a casino floor with this book in my hand and I saw the Pit Bosses trembling with fear
This is tangential, but the worst I have ever felt about losing a competition was when I entered the World Cup of Handicapping at Caesars Palace in the 80's. One weekend contest, football handicapping, 1K entrance fee. I needed to go 16-4 ATS, I think, to cash in the college bracket. Went 15-5. Anyway, that wasn't why I felt bad. The overall winner was a guy named Edmund Slick, who claimed he handicapped via astrology. That was his thing. He went to the cocktail parties and awards banquet wearing a tux with stars and planets all over it, including on the lapels. Had a big frizzy afro and meteors on his lapels.
"Psycho-biological" seems high brow in comparison.
Quote: AxelWolfMost of the time the person who the post was directed at must make a complaint to Mike via PM.Quote: fantomI have never argued or disagreed with the idea that this forum is run under the form of a dictatorship. Not a benign one, in the least.
Mike has the right to suspend anyone he wants, for any reason. In fact, he has the right to use any word, phrase, comment, insult or obscenity he wants, even those which HIS rules prohibit. It's his "property" and we post here, totally and exclusively, at his pleasure.
rex non potest peccare
I do take exception to the hypocrisy inherent in the arbitrary, uneven, selective and inconsistent way in which these supposed hard and fast rules are applied, and the varying penalties handed dowm from on high. All of this is done on a whim and depends on the mood of he (or they) who are the judges, juries and executioners.
There is but one rule here. The Wizard Rules. Even if He Who Must Be Obeyed insists that we all pretend that there are other rules, we all now how it is. He may be the Wizard of Las Vegas, but here he's the Tyrant as well.
Axel, question. Why is it you seem to spar with so many members here?
I hate to answer a question with a question, but I think it's appropriate in this case. How many is many?Quote: Marcusclark66Quote: AxelWolfMost of the time the person who the post was directed at must make a complaint to Mike via PM.Quote: fantomI have never argued or disagreed with the idea that this forum is run under the form of a dictatorship. Not a benign one, in the least.
Mike has the right to suspend anyone he wants, for any reason. In fact, he has the right to use any word, phrase, comment, insult or obscenity he wants, even those which HIS rules prohibit. It's his "property" and we post here, totally and exclusively, at his pleasure.
rex non potest peccare
I do take exception to the hypocrisy inherent in the arbitrary, uneven, selective and inconsistent way in which these supposed hard and fast rules are applied, and the varying penalties handed dowm from on high. All of this is done on a whim and depends on the mood of he (or they) who are the judges, juries and executioners.
There is but one rule here. The Wizard Rules. Even if He Who Must Be Obeyed insists that we all pretend that there are other rules, we all now how it is. He may be the Wizard of Las Vegas, but here he's the Tyrant as well.
Axel, question. Why is it you seem to spar with so many members here?
Quote: AxelWolfI hate to answer a question with a question, but I think it's appropriate in this case. How many is many?Quote: Marcusclark66Quote: AxelWolfMost of the time the person who the post was directed at must make a complaint to Mike via PM.Quote: fantomI have never argued or disagreed with the idea that this forum is run under the form of a dictatorship. Not a benign one, in the least.
Mike has the right to suspend anyone he wants, for any reason. In fact, he has the right to use any word, phrase, comment, insult or obscenity he wants, even those which HIS rules prohibit. It's his "property" and we post here, totally and exclusively, at his pleasure.
rex non potest peccare
I do take exception to the hypocrisy inherent in the arbitrary, uneven, selective and inconsistent way in which these supposed hard and fast rules are applied, and the varying penalties handed dowm from on high. All of this is done on a whim and depends on the mood of he (or they) who are the judges, juries and executioners.
There is but one rule here. The Wizard Rules. Even if He Who Must Be Obeyed insists that we all pretend that there are other rules, we all now how it is. He may be the Wizard of Las Vegas, but here he's the Tyrant as well.
Axel, question. Why is it you seem to spar with so many members here?
Many
Quote: unJonQuote: AxelWolfI hate to answer a question with a question, but I think it's appropriate in this case. How many is many?Quote: Marcusclark66Quote: AxelWolfMost of the time the person who the post was directed at must make a complaint to Mike via PM.Quote: fantomI have never argued or disagreed with the idea that this forum is run under the form of a dictatorship. Not a benign one, in the least.
Mike has the right to suspend anyone he wants, for any reason. In fact, he has the right to use any word, phrase, comment, insult or obscenity he wants, even those which HIS rules prohibit. It's his "property" and we post here, totally and exclusively, at his pleasure.
rex non potest peccare
I do take exception to the hypocrisy inherent in the arbitrary, uneven, selective and inconsistent way in which these supposed hard and fast rules are applied, and the varying penalties handed dowm from on high. All of this is done on a whim and depends on the mood of he (or they) who are the judges, juries and executioners.
There is but one rule here. The Wizard Rules. Even if He Who Must Be Obeyed insists that we all pretend that there are other rules, we all now how it is. He may be the Wizard of Las Vegas, but here he's the Tyrant as well.
Axel, question. Why is it you seem to spar with so many members here?
Many
"Pat" on the back, thanks.
Quote: EvenBobMore like lack the willingness, not lack the capacity.
In every other game, anytime someone has been able to find a player advantage in some way, someone is willing and able to articulate some of the details, even if only one or two words. For example anyone who has an edge at blackjack would just say "counting" or "hole carding". For machines, it could be "point multipliers", or "best payables", or "variable state" or whatever.
Why does that not happen with baccarat? It does for something like "edge sorting" or "loss rebate". Is that how you have found a player advantage at the game? Or is it something else? Why are advantages at baccarat so much more special than every other casino game?
