AxiomOfChoice
AxiomOfChoice
Joined: Sep 12, 2012
  • Threads: 32
  • Posts: 5761
February 7th, 2014 at 4:25:34 PM permalink
Quote: boymimbo

He owes the casino player $10K.
He owes the casino $12K.

He stole 22K.



I don't understand this logic. Why does he owe the casino $12k? If he pays the other player $10k, everyone has been made whole. The casino has not lost anything (the actual results of the gambling are irrelevant)

Is the issue here that he gambled with someone else's freeplay, which is not allowed (since freeplay is non-transferrable?)
strictlyAP
strictlyAP
Joined: Jun 20, 2012
  • Threads: 116
  • Posts: 983
February 7th, 2014 at 4:28:57 PM permalink
google scott rothstein case to see, that in fact they can go after people that profited such as reclaiming money that was given to a charity,
also by the way math extremist- what was the result in that instance?
The bet will not be paid- not now not ever

  • Jump to: