Recommended online casinos

Thread Rating:

Poll

15 votes (20%)
22 votes (29.33%)
17 votes (22.66%)
41 votes (54.66%)

75 members have voted

FleaStiff
FleaStiff
FleaStiff
Joined: Oct 19, 2009
  • Threads: 265
  • Posts: 14484
June 26th, 2013 at 11:49:27 AM permalink
Does it mean I no longer have to agree with someone that I am happily married? Or does it mean that if the dice roll "seven" I no longer can blame it on events depicted in some Hollywood movie?
thecesspit
thecesspit
thecesspit
Joined: Apr 19, 2010
  • Threads: 53
  • Posts: 5936
June 26th, 2013 at 11:49:33 AM permalink
Quote: Nareed

The US Supreme Court pretty much struck down DOMA (the full name of that law is so nonsensical I won't repeat it).

So the poll is: how do you feel about it?



None of the above, and your choices mean there's little point in debating this with you.
"Then you can admire the real gambler, who has neither eaten, slept, thought nor lived, he has so smarted under the scourge of his martingale, so suffered on the rack of his desire for a coup at trente-et-quarante" - Honore de Balzac, 1829
HotBlonde
HotBlonde
HotBlonde
Joined: Feb 8, 2011
  • Threads: 114
  • Posts: 1723
June 26th, 2013 at 11:53:12 AM permalink
I voted that I am delighted. My cousin is gay and I'm very, very happy for her and her partner.

Does this have any affect on you being a resident in Mexico, Nareed?
OFFICIALLY and justifiably reclaimed my title as SuperHotBlonde!
EvenBob
EvenBob
EvenBob
Joined: Jul 18, 2010
  • Threads: 434
  • Posts: 25333
June 26th, 2013 at 11:53:40 AM permalink
Quote: FleaStiff

Does it mean I no longer have to agree with someone that I am happily married?



Happily married, is that the original oxymoron?


ox·y·mo·ron (ks-môrn, -mr-)
n. pl. ox·y·mo·ra (-môr, -mr) or ox·y·mo·rons

A rhetorical figure in which contradictory terms are combined, as in a 'deafening silence' and a 'mournful optimist'.
"It's not enough to succeed, your friends must fail." Gore Vidal
Nareed
Nareed
Nareed
Joined: Nov 11, 2009
  • Threads: 373
  • Posts: 11413
June 26th, 2013 at 11:55:28 AM permalink
Quote: HotBlonde

Does this have any affect on you being a resident in Mexico, Nareed?



Well, it's complicated. Short answer is no. Long answer is it might.

But extending the recognition of rights to any people is always cause for celebration.
Donald Trump is a fucking criminal
HotBlonde
HotBlonde
HotBlonde
Joined: Feb 8, 2011
  • Threads: 114
  • Posts: 1723
June 26th, 2013 at 11:58:27 AM permalink
Quote: Nareed

Well, it's complicated. Short answer is no. Long answer is it might.

But extending the recognition of rights to any people is always cause for celebration.

Absolutely! Great attitude! (And is it effect or affect? I often get those two words confused.)
OFFICIALLY and justifiably reclaimed my title as SuperHotBlonde!
Nareed
Nareed
Nareed
Joined: Nov 11, 2009
  • Threads: 373
  • Posts: 11413
June 26th, 2013 at 12:08:53 PM permalink
Quote: HotBlonde

Absolutely! Great attitude! (And is it effect or affect? I often get those two words confused.)



Thanks :)

In this case, it's "effect."
Donald Trump is a fucking criminal
pew
pew
pew
Joined: Oct 6, 2012
  • Threads: 0
  • Posts: 221
June 26th, 2013 at 12:43:13 PM permalink
Quote: Nareed

Well, it's complicated. Short answer is no. Long answer is it might.

But extending the recognition of rights to any people is always cause for celebration.

Not rights, license.
Nareed
Nareed
Nareed
Joined: Nov 11, 2009
  • Threads: 373
  • Posts: 11413
June 26th, 2013 at 12:47:28 PM permalink
Quote: thecesspit

None of the above, and your choices mean there's little point in debating this with you.



You can always debate.

I admit the choices were designed to tee certain people off.
Donald Trump is a fucking criminal
AZDuffman
AZDuffman
AZDuffman
Joined: Nov 2, 2009
  • Threads: 231
  • Posts: 12762
June 26th, 2013 at 12:51:04 PM permalink
Quote: Boz

I usually stay out of these debates on here, but I just want to know why I cant have 2 wives now? Or three or whatever I want. Why is it limited to just 2 people? So it is OK to be between a man and woman, or man and man or woman and woman, but not 3? Please explain the logic of that to me.

If we care about equal opportunity, why not allow everyone to be happy if the 3 parties are OK with it?



The way I read it is the Feds must recognize any marriage but the states do not have to. So as of today you may indeed go to a country that will allow you to marry more than one woman and the Feds will have to recognize that marriage. Or most any other limitation.

May be a way to dodge the inheritance tax. Think about it, mom and dad are married. Son and his wife are married. Son's daughter marries dad and inherits the estate, then her and son have it tax-free when both parents die! I mean, as of today whoever wants to get married can, otherwise it is discriminatory!

The possibilities are endless!
All animals are equal, but some are more equal than others
RSS Feed

  • Jump to: