1. Wizard of Oz slot machine. I know it's not a new machine, but it was new to me and I couldn't get enough. The effects were a blast, and the people playing next to me were always cheering me on as well. I almost peed my pants the first time the flying monkeys showed up.
2. Blackjack (6:5) at Bally's Party Pit. I know, I know - I shouldn't have - but I was with an insistent friend. Drinks came fast and strong and the dealers I met were some of the nicest I came across all week. Too bad my chips didn't pile up as fast as the decks of cards they kept giving me.
I am not a shill for Harrah's properties either, that is just about the only way I'll play at one of their hotels.
Table games: Three card poker.
I guess I play Blackjack to finance the other games, LOL.
Quote: dlevinelaw...the 6:5 poolside at the Flamingo is awesome...
This sentence has never been uttered before by humanity, in any language, in over a million years of talking and writing.
--Dorothy
----------------------------------------
DGs Minimally Offensive Signature
Quote: NareedIf you enjoy a game that has a really bad house edge, and you know what your likely loss is, that's fine and there shouldn't be any guilt involved.
Most 6:5 blackjack has a house edge ~1.5% (according to the survey on this site). Thats not too bad... compares favorably to placing the 6 or 8 in craps, and is much better then Roulette. So if its the only 'blackjack' game at limits you are comfortable with, hey, I am not going to fault you for playing! Especially if there are other 'bonuses' to playing (pretty dealers, freely flowing booze, whatever!) However, I don't play 6:5 because usually there are 3:2 shoe games at the same limit available at the same casino or nearby. Also, I don't want to support in any way the encroachment of 6:5. But again, to each his own!
Quote: DrEntropyMost 6:5 blackjack has a house edge ~1.5% (according to the survey on this site). Thats not too bad... compares favorably to placing the 6 or 8 in craps, and is much better then Roulette. So if its the only 'blackjack' game at limits you are comfortable with, hey, I am not going to fault you for playing! Especially if there are other 'bonuses' to playing (pretty dealers, freely flowing booze, whatever!) However, I don't play 6:5 because usually there are 3:2 shoe games at the same limit available at the same casino or nearby. Also, I don't want to support in any way the encroachment of 6:5. But again, to each his own!
I understand. In that case you should decide which is of more value to you: playing any kind of available BJ you enjoy, or making every effort to stamp out 6:5 twenty one. Guilt is not necessary.
Keno has about the worst house edge of any game. I don't play it. Partly because of the house edge, partly because I don't enjoy it. But I smile when I pass the Keno area and see lots of, usually, older people enjoying the game.
I'm about to say something odd: pleasure is too important not to be enjoyed. I mean if something brings you pelasure without hurting you in any significant way, or in any way you're unwilling to accept, then forget about whether it's proper or not and just enjoy it. Be it Keno, or 6:5, or a silly song, or anything.
Regarding 6:5, I understand the casino offering it if it includes a frill benefit - like poolside, or pleasure pits etc. What bothers me is when they offer it alongside regular tables. Here nobody gains anything by playing it - its certainly not any more fun than 3:2. But, I blame the players more than anything. You don't need to go to the Wizard of Odds to realize that your blackjack was short payed and you should go to another table. The fact that there are still players making this mistake years after its introduction is a telling tale about the sheer stupidity of some gamblers.