Hope this doesn't sound very crazy : )
Almost 10 years ago, I(for personal understanding) searched different programs for predicting roulette. I've watched about ~50 different programs, and find some programs that actually worked. If in training room, you can get-up-EV to ~+250%, But in a real casino it is very difficult to use it. But working with programs you begin to understand the basic of roulette predicting.
A. One soft works like manual clocker
B. The second soft works like fixed position video camera predictor
It is salable?!
Quote: Dobrij
It is salable?!
No.
Have you tested it in an online casino with live dealer?Quote: DobrijHello to all !
Hope this doesn't sound very crazy : )
Almost 10 years ago, I(for personal understanding) searched different programs for predicting roulette. I've watched about ~50 different programs, and find some programs that actually worked. If in training room, you can get-up-EV to ~+250%, But in a real casino it is very difficult to use it. But working with programs you begin to understand the basic of roulette predicting.
A. One soft works like manual clocker
B. The second soft works like fixed position video camera predictor
It is salable?!
I’m not sure if betting has to happen before the ball is released in those games or not.
Quote: billryanIf we throw it in a lake, will it float?
I don’t think you understand what the OP meant.
Quote: unJonHave you tested it in an online casino with live dealer?
I’m not sure if betting has to happen before the ball is released in those games or not.
Have not tried it. The fact is that now the program works in a video camera, or with a video. This program is ideal to use if you yourself hang the camera over the wheel. Prog now not work with the screen, there is no such function, but I have an open source code, can try to write.
But most online casinos close their bets before the spin or too early to get a forecast and place a bet. And online casinos use wheels with RSS (like this: https://www.cammegh.com/our-products/roulette-wheels/mercury-360-rrs/). with RSS predict imposible
https://www.theguardian.com/science/2004/mar/23/sciencenews.crime
In that case the gang got away with it and got to keep the 1.3 million pounds they had won.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk/4069629.stm
Unclear whether this was because whatever they did was not technically illegal in the U.K. or if the casino just wanted to avoid having the method revealed in court.
Laser scam' gamblers to keep £1m
Roulette wheel
A laser scanner was allegedly used by the gamblers
A group of gamblers who won more than £1m at the Ritz Casino in London by using laser technology have been told by police they can keep their winnings.
The trio - a Hungarian woman and two Serbian men - were arrested in March but police have apparently decided that they did not break the law.
A laser scanner linked to a computer was allegedly used to gauge numbers likely to come up on the roulette wheel.
But police said the case had now been closed, with no charges brought.
The gamblers managed to earn £1.3m in winnings thanks to the alleged "sting".
On the first night they won £100,000 and on the second took home another £1.2 m, the Sunday Times reported.
Funds frozen
They allegedly used the scanner to judge the speed of the ball on the roulette wheel and hence the number most likely to come up.
The paper reports the gamblers were able to do the calculations swiftly enough to place their bets as required before the roulette wheel has gone round three times.
The three were arrested after the casino launched inquiries and initially their funds were frozen.
The newspaper said casinos throughout the country were examining security as a result of the case.
A spokeswoman for the Ritz Casino said they had "no comment" to make on the case.
Quote: billryanIf we throw it in a lake, will it float?
Is it, or is it not, a witch?
Quote: MDawg
Unclear whether this was because whatever they did was not technically illegal in the U.K. or if the casino just wanted to avoid having the method revealed in court.
in my time here i have learned that most of the successful scams are never actually prosecuted because there was not laws in place to actually make it illegal.
so yes what you said about this particuar scam is true, in the sense that it wasnt illegal to use a computer at the time
somewhere i have a paper that describes that scam in detail and i am almost sure it says they werent prosecuted because of the lack of laws
Quote: billryanIf we throw it in a lake, will it float?
Ha ha ha! Yes, I asked myself this question to : )
In most cases soft like this will how do you say “float”, because it all depends on …
Quote: unJonI don’t think you understand what the OP meant.
link to original post
Some people get it. Evidently, some don't.