Trump's Final 100 days
IT'S GREAT STUFF!!!
In the book:
He calls Donald Trump Jr. treasonous.
He calls Ivanka Trump dumb as a brick.
The book asserts that those close to him call Trump Senior an "idiot" a "dope" and "dumb as dirt."
I'M LOVING EVERY MINUTE OF IT!!!!!
this is how some in DC are planning to boot the pathetic dotard out of office
via the 25th amendment to the Constitution Section 4: (the gun lovers will love this. they love the Constitution)
Whenever the Vice President and a majority of either the principal officers of the executive departments or of such other body as Congress may by law provide, transmit to the President pro tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives their written declaration that the President is unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office, the Vice President shall immediately assume the powers and duties of the office as Acting President.
Thereafter, when the President transmits to the President pro tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives his written declaration that no inability exists, he shall resume the powers and duties of his office unless the Vice President and a majority of either the principal officers of the executive department or of such other body as Congress may by law provide, transmit within four days to the President pro tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives their written declaration that the President is unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office. Thereupon Congress shall decide the issue, assembling within forty-eight hours for that purpose if not in session. If the Congress, within twenty-one days after receipt of the latter written declaration, or, if Congress is not in session, within twenty-one days after Congress is required to assemble, determines by two-thirds vote of both Houses that the President is unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office, the Vice President shall continue to discharge the same as Acting President; otherwise, the President shall resume the powers and duties of his office.[3]onstitution section 4:
I'm not trying to cover up for a child molester, so don't go there. I find that very offensive and over the line. I think he's probably guilty of some inappropriate conduct with minors. I wish the statute of limitations had not run out so charges could be filed and there could be a trial. I WAS ONLY SAYING THERE IS NO PROOF HE WAS BANNED FROM A THE MALL. I am talking about this mall incident only.Quote: ams288Quote: AxelWolfThat's your proof?? No wonder many innocent people go to jail. Please do the country a favor.... excuse yourself from jury duty if you get called.Quote: ams288
https://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/politics/item/27413-manager-disputes-claim-that-roy-moore-was-banned-from-mall
"In this case, the mall manager from 1981-1998, Barnes Boyle, told local TV station WBRC late last week that Moore was never banned from the mall."
And your proof involves a mall manager who worked there years after the incident in question who "can't recall" him being banned.
I believe the women.
Feel free to keep trying to cover for the child molester though, it's a good look for you.
Can you post up a link where he said he "can't recall"? I believe he said, "not to my knowledge." The manager also said he would have seen it in the written reports if he had been banned. No one can come up with anything other than hearsay that he was banned. She said a manager told her he was banned. That's hearsay in my book.
Years before? she worked there until about 1983. The manager also worked there in 1981. How do you know when this incident happened? She herself didn't even know how old she was at the time("I was PROBABLY in my 20's), so I'm not sure how she knew what year it happened. It could have happened in 1982 that wouldn't have been years before the manager worked there.
The cashier was in her 20's at the time and he was in his 30's. She worked in a MEN'S clothing store. I don't find it unusual for a man to be in a men's clothing store. I don't find it that unusual for an unmarried man(he got married to his wife in 1985) in his 30's to ask out a girl in her 20's. She never said he did anything inappropriate. She said, He asked her for her phone number and asked her out. She said, "He would stop by and chitchat."
She said she didn't want him hanging around her counter to get her in trouble or get her fired. She asked her manager what could be done. The manager came back though and said he had him banned. She never said she wanted him banned, she never said there was anything related to sexual harassment or anything inappropriate.
Quote: AxelWolfI'm not trying to cover up for a child molester, so don't go there. I find that very offensive and over the line.
Cue the violins.
Quote:I think he's probably guilty of some inappropriate conduct with minors. I wish the statute of limitations had not run out so charges could be filed and there could be a trial. I WAS ONLY SAYING THERE IS NO PROOF HE WAS BANNED FROM A THE MALL. I am talking about this mall incident only.
There is plenty of evidence that he is a child molester. There are plenty of people who remember him being banned from the mall. And there is one manager who kinda-sorta doesn't think he was banned.
You say you think Moore is probably guilty of some inappropriate behavior with minors, but appear to take great offense in regards to these mall allegations. Are you a manager for The Gap or something? Why choose this hill to die on?
Quote:Can you post up a link where he said he "can't recall"? I believe he said, "not to my knowledge."
Nope. That was my mistake... I conflated "can't recall" with "not to my knowledge." I just knew his statement that all the Moore-defenders constantly cite was wishy washy and not the definitive denial that they make it out to be.
Quote: BozQuote: beachbumbabsQuote: KeyserQuote: Romes
In all seriousness this has been shown now more than ever to be the awful truth. Republicans absolutely put party over the country. Hell, Roy Moore was banned from malls for hitting on underage girls, and the republican response was "Better than a democrat!"
So what. Dems elected Bill Clinton. And in case you forget he used his power to unload a grievous amount glutinous viscous gelatin like suspension of dna and lively organic lubricants on an intern's dress, raped at least one woman and sexually harassed several others.
And his wife...let's not forget about the Russian uranium deal, gross negligence handling state secrets and emails....and..................................it goes on forever. LOL.
MAGA!
Speaking of "so what". Deflect much?
With all due respect, and you know I like you Babs, you are what’s wrong with the old guard of the Republican Party. To coin an old phrase, With Republicans like you, who needs enemies?
Hey, Boz, you know I like you, too, but "my way or the highway"? When did either party start requiring Borg-like assimilation? That's one of the biggest problems in the GOP. It's narrowed its vision to one dystopian jackbooted loyalty test after another.
"Who do you believe, me or your lyin eyes?" I believe my eyes. And ears. And upbringing to respect and revere the office of the Presidency as representing and serving us all. Trump is completely undeserving, both in who he is, and what he's done in office.
And no, the Mueller investigation is a long way from done. We don't yet know all kinds of things. But Papadopoulous and Flynn have been talking for months, and both have enough on higher-ups to have gotten plea bargains. They don't give plea bargains to the top of the pyramid.
Not much room above those two. Most of those who remain are named Trump or married Trump.
Mueller is a long-time Republican, too. But perhaps his first loyalty is to his country, as it should be, and as mine is.
Quote:It was Hicks who, attentive to his lapses and repetitions, urged him to forgo an interview that was set to open the 60 Minutes fall season. Instead, the interview went to Fox News' Sean Hannity who, White House insiders happily explained, was willing to supply the questions beforehand. Indeed, the plan was to have all interviewers going forward provide the questions.
WOW!
Question: who is the last presidential hopeful you know who did NOT carry his home state?
In the most lopsided election of the past 50 years (Reagan vs Mondale) Mondale lost every state except one. Trumpets roll - his HOME state
Donald Trump lost his home state!!!
Think about that for awhile
Not hard to do with a country full of uneducated celebrity gossip queens.Quote: KeyserDonald Trump also won the presidency on his first try as an outsider. Think about that! ...
The one good thing that him winning did was show that yes, ANYONE can be president regardless of qualifications (#SAD). He just opened the door WIDE OPEN for other celebrities with more qualifications than himself, like Bill Nye and Neil DeGrasse Tyson to run. They would easily win if they ran in the next election.
Quote: RomesNot hard to do with a country full of uneducated celebrity gossip queens.Quote: KeyserDonald Trump also won the presidency on his first try as an outsider. Think about that! ...
The one good thing that him winning did was show that yes, ANYONE can be president regardless of qualifications (#SAD). He just opened the door WIDE OPEN for other celebrities with more qualifications than himself, like Bill Nye and Neil DeGrasse Tyson to run. They would easily win if they ran in the next election.
WHO??????????????
Trump threatens to sue “Fire and Fury” publisher to stop the book’s release
Quote:In a letter sent to publisher Henry Holt and Co. and author Michael Wolff, Donald Trump’s lawyer demanded it “immediately cease and desist from any further publication, release or dissemination” of the book Fire and Fury, even though the book is already shipping to stores and has landed in the hands of journalists ahead of its Jan. 9 release date.
Quote: ams288
Feel free to keep trying to cover for the child molester though, it's a good look for you.
I think this is the worst personal insult I have seen on this forum.
Quote: SOOPOOI think this is the worst personal insult I have seen on this forum.
Boo-friggin-hoo.
Quote: ams288Damn, I gotta read this book!!
Trump threatens to sue “Fire and Fury” publisher to stop the book’s release
I've ordered my copy!
Quote: KeyserDonald Trump also won the presidency on his first try as an outsider. Think about that!
Yea thats more an insult to how stupid the americsn people are than any statement about trump
THAT THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES IS A DUMMY
hopefully, the powers that be in DC will soon force him into a nursing home
or maybe he can handle assisted living at least for a couple of years
Lay offs lowest since 1990. Trump tax
bill spurs 27% in new hiring for 2018,
and that's just the start.
Impeach! Impeach! Impeach!
LOLOL
Quote: EvenBobImpeach! Impeach! Impeach!
From your mouth to God's ears!
Quote: EvenBob250,000 jobs in Dec. Market hits 25,000.
Lay offs lowest since 1990. Trump tax
bill spurs 27% in new hiring for 2018,
and that's just the start.
Impeach! Impeach! Impeach!
LOLOL
Tax cuts spurs 27% increase in hiring in 2018!
And its only January 4th
LOLOLOL
CRAGA!
Commie Republicans Against Greater America
Quote: KeyserWow it sounds like Bannon is going to sink Trump when he testifies against him as a material witness. Oh...wait, he's not been called to testify against Trump? He hasn't even hired a lawyer? He's only written a book? LOL.
Nice try ams288. Here's a suggestion, watch more FoxNews and listen to Rush.
MAGA!
Happy New Year everyone.
You can't have it both ways. Up until four days ago, Bannon was the alt-rights' hero. When Bannon makes statements that you don't happen to agree with, it's not a valid position to simply discount what your hero who engaged the alt-right (to get Trump elected) and who worked in Trump's cabinet until the summer.
You tell us to go watch FoxNews who is/was an ally to Bannon up to a week ago.
Quote: ams288Cue the violins.
There is plenty of evidence that he is a child molester. There are plenty of people who remember him being banned from the mall. And there is one manager who kinda-sorta doesn't think he was banned.
You say you think Moore is probably guilty of some inappropriate behavior with minors, but appear to take great offense in regards to these mall allegations. Are you a manager for The Gap or something? Why choose this hill to die on?
Nope. That was my mistake... I conflated "can't recall" with "not to my knowledge." I just knew his statement that all the Moore-defenders constantly cite was wishy washy and not the definitive denial that they make it out to be.
I am getting tired of the overblowing of men's issues. If Moore was a child molester he would have been charged for it. More than likely, his behavior was absolutely inappropriate and he should have known better, just as Trump should have known better to not walk into a dressing room for Miss Teen USA and brag about it on Howard Stern. Child Molestation is a crime.
Look, I've been convicted of a crime. There is a burden of proof, and I frankly find it insulting that we go out and falsely accuse anyone of criminal behavior when there is no criminal evidence to support it.
Was Roy Moore a creep? More than likely? Did he behave inappropriately with minors? Absolutely. Did he molest them? Assault them? Rape them? Unknown. Evangelist white people voted for him because a white pervert can be forgiven. Black evangelicals voted against him because a current racist cannot be forgiven.
And as the right should say, it's a thing of the past. Moore lost. The GOP were hypocrites to support him. Trump went so far to hold a rally for him and then claim in a tweet that he knew he was going to lose. I thought Trump didn't back losers. But it's in the past, just like Clinton's emails are in the past. Right?
Or should we continue to deflect and bring up Michelle's dress?
Never ceases to amaze me the way people look at data to bias and see what they want. Trump has been in office and done essentially nothing (thank 'god') for LESS than a year. The jobs you see, and the market you see, are largely thanks to PRESIDENT OBAMA and the things he did while in office over the previous 8 years.Quote: EvenBob250,000 jobs in Dec. Market hits 25,000.
Lay offs lowest since 1990. Trump tax
bill spurs 27% in new hiring for 2018,
and that's just the start.
Impeach! Impeach! Impeach!
LOLOL
Obama does 50 things that boost our jobs/economy - "HE'S A MUSLIM!"
Trump takes office and on day 1 thanks to Obama jobs/economy is rising - "HE DID IT! HE FIXED EVERYTHING!"
Figures never lie, but liars sometimes figure...
Quote: lilredroosterSoon, because of the book, the whole world, all those who have not yet realized will see:
THAT THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES IS A DUMMY
hopefully, the powers that be in DC will soon force him into a nursing home
or maybe he can handle assisted living at least for a couple of years
It doesn't take a book to realize that a fairly successful business man does not make a good president. Look, Steve Jobs, Bill Gates, Warren Buffett all amassed huge fortunes. It doesn't mean they have the skills to be president.
No one is dumb and becomes president. Misinformed and petty, absolutely.
Quote: rsactuaryQuote: ams288Damn, I gotta read this book!!
Trump threatens to sue “Fire and Fury” publisher to stop the book’s release
I've ordered my copy!
LOL - the publisher is allowing stores to start selling it tomorrow. It was supposed to go on sale next Tuesday January 9th.
Thanks, Donald!
Quote: RomesFigures never lie, but liars sometimes figure...
You’re talking to a crowd that legitimately believes that Michelle Obama has a penis, yet dismisses something like Russian election interference as a liberal conspiracy.
The only rebuttal to anything less than an undying allegiance to the god-emperor has been “Hillary Clinton” or “Fake News”.
So why try to make a substantive argument when we can just make sh!t up and post memes like everyone else? Here I’ll go first....
Quote: gamerfreak
That's actually pretty funny.
Quote: RSQuote: gamerfreak
That's actually pretty funny.
Lol he put his small hands up the turkeys stuffings
Quote: ams288Quote: AxelWolfThat's your proof?? No wonder many innocent people go to jail. Please do the country a favor.... excuse yourself from jury duty if you get called.Quote: ams288
https://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/politics/item/27413-manager-disputes-claim-that-roy-moore-was-banned-from-mall
"In this case, the mall manager from 1981-1998, Barnes Boyle, told local TV station WBRC late last week that Moore was never banned from the mall."
And your proof involves a mall manager who worked there years after the incident in question who "can't recall" him being banned.
I believe the women.
Feel free to keep trying to cover for the child molester though, it's a good look for you.
Not sure how this isn’t an insult worth a suspension. Saying covering for a child molester is a good look for a valued member here isn’t an insult is repulsive to me. Let’s see if the accused liberal bias is in affect here. And I know Axel wouldn’t expect a suspension over that but at some point we need a level playing field.
Quote: BozQuote: ams288Quote: AxelWolfThat's your proof?? No wonder many innocent people go to jail. Please do the country a favor.... excuse yourself from jury duty if you get called.Quote: ams288
https://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/politics/item/27413-manager-disputes-claim-that-roy-moore-was-banned-from-mall
"In this case, the mall manager from 1981-1998, Barnes Boyle, told local TV station WBRC late last week that Moore was never banned from the mall."
And your proof involves a mall manager who worked there years after the incident in question who "can't recall" him being banned.
I believe the women.
Feel free to keep trying to cover for the child molester though, it's a good look for you.
Not sure how this isn’t an insult worth a suspension. Saying covering for a child molester is a good look for a valued member here isn’t an insult is repulsive to me. Let’s see if the accused liberal bias is in affect here. And I know Axel wouldn’t expect a suspension over that but at some point we need a level playing field.
Replace "a child molester" with "Roy Moore" (the two terms are interchangeable, after all). Still offended?
And to think, you guys call us lefties "snowflakes." Irony!
Quote:https://www.cnbc.com/2018/01/04/warren-buffett-on-the-failure-of-trickle-down-economics.html
https://www.cnbc.com/2018/01/04/warren-buffett-on-the-failure-of-trickle-down-economics.html
Warren Buffet probably the most qualified person on earth to make that statement.
Quote:In a lawsuit that echoes a civil case against President Trump, an Alabama woman on Thursday sued failed U.S. Senate candidate Roy Moore and his campaign for defamation, citing harsh personal attacks she faced after coming forward with allegations he touched her sexually when she was 14 years old.
Leigh Corfman is not seeking financial compensation beyond legal costs. She is asking for a declaratory judgment of defamation, a public apology from Moore, and a court-enforced ban on him or his campaign publicly attacking her again. She said in a statement that the suit seeks "to do what I could not do as a 14-year-old — hold Mr. Moore and those who enable him accountable."
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/woman-who-accused-roy-moore-of-sexual-misconduct-sues-him-for-defamation/ar-BBHSLrw?li=BBmkt5R&ocid=spartanntp
Quote: ams288Quote: BozQuote: ams288Quote: AxelWolfThat's your proof?? No wonder many innocent people go to jail. Please do the country a favor.... excuse yourself from jury duty if you get called.Quote: ams288
https://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/politics/item/27413-manager-disputes-claim-that-roy-moore-was-banned-from-mall
"In this case, the mall manager from 1981-1998, Barnes Boyle, told local TV station WBRC late last week that Moore was never banned from the mall."
And your proof involves a mall manager who worked there years after the incident in question who "can't recall" him being banned.
I believe the women.
Feel free to keep trying to cover for the child molester though, it's a good look for you.
Not sure how this isn’t an insult worth a suspension. Saying covering for a child molester is a good look for a valued member here isn’t an insult is repulsive to me. Let’s see if the accused liberal bias is in affect here. And I know Axel wouldn’t expect a suspension over that but at some point we need a level playing field.
Replace "a child molester" with "Roy Moore" (the two terms are interchangeable, after all). Still offended?
And to think, you guys call us lefties "snowflakes." Irony!
I’m just glad to know you are not a card carrying NAMBLA member. We need more people to call them out for what they are. For far too long regular homosexuals have been associated with their vile views. Thank you for being on the right side on this issue!
Quote: BozI’m just glad to know you are not a card carrying NAMBLA member. We need more people to call them out for what they are. For far too long regular homosexuals have been associated with their vile views. Thank you for being on the right side on this issue!
Yeah, the tables have really turned. For years, bigoted straight men have incorrectly accused gays of being pedophiles.
But when one of their own gets outed as one, they do everything they can to defend him and discredit his accusers. Perhaps their accusations against the gays were all for show, to hide their own demons... hmmm...
(I'm speaking in generalities here, not about any specific member(s). So please, save the faux outrage).
Quote: ams288Yeah, the tables have really turned. For years, bigoted straight men have incorrectly accused gays of being pedophiles.
But when one of their own gets outed as one, they do everything they can to defend him and discredit his accusers. Perhaps their accusations against the gays were all for show, to hide their own demons... hmmm...
(I'm speaking in generalities here, not about any specific member(s). So please, save the faux outrage).
You are absolutely right, it has always been straight men having sex with young (under 18) boys.
Quote: SOOPOOI think this is the worst personal insult I have seen on this forum.
I am sure a moderator will take care of it shortly........hold your breath.
Couple it to the increasingly liberal political agenda and the ascendancy of a woman candidate for president: that did it.
Ma and Pa Kettle decided to pull the plug on that clown show.
The NYT is reporting that Mueller has obtained hand written notes from Reince Preibus that substantiate James Comey's testimony.
Actually, that's just one of many bombshells in this article.
It's a great read. Not sure if the link will work. Just go to the NYT site if you wanna read it (I'm sure the righties will predictably scream "fake news" and just turn the channel to Hannity or whatever trash is on FNC right now).
https://mobile.nytimes.com/2018/01/04/us/politics/trump-sessions-russia-mcgahn.html?action=click&module=Top%20Stories&pgtype=Homepage
Quote: ams288Quote: rsactuaryQuote: ams288Damn, I gotta read this book!!
Trump threatens to sue “Fire and Fury” publisher to stop the book’s release
I've ordered my copy!
LOL - the publisher is allowing stores to start selling it tomorrow. It was supposed to go on sale next Tuesday January 9th.
Thanks, Donald!
Trump tried to stop publication
Got his lawyers to try to stop the book
WTF
Talk about being against freedom
What a thin skinned moron
ALL Presidents are written about
To try to stop publication is just stupid.
They gave Michael Wolff White House access.
What did they expect.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/trump’s-effort-to-stop-publication-of-scathing-book-is-a-break-in-precedent/ar-BBHSWPa?li=BBmkt5R&ocid=spartanntp
Quote: ams288
Feel free to keep trying to cover for the child molester though, it's a good look for you.
After being PM'ed about it, I have discussed this matter with BeachBumBabs (as I normally do not participate in political threads) and we have decided that this is not a Personal Insult, but falls under Rule 12 Trolling/Bullying, which states as follows:
Quote:12.) No bullying/trolling: Members are expected to act like ladies and gentlemen. Members may not be overly divisive or abusive to another member
We have determined that the statement above, as written, is excessively divisive.
Thus, AMS288 is banned for Three Days as he has no other recent offenses on record.
Quote: ams288The noose is tightening!
The NYT is reporting that Mueller has obtained hand written notes from Reince Preibus that substantiate James Comey's testimony.
Actually, that's just one of many bombshells in this article.
It's a great read. Not sure if the link will work. Just go to the NYT site if you wanna read it (I'm sure the righties will predictably scream "fake news" and just turn the channel to Hannity or whatever trash is on FNC right now).
https://mobile.nytimes.com/2018/01/04/us/politics/trump-sessions-russia-mcgahn.html?action=click&module=Top%20Stories&pgtype=Homepage
It worked for me on my phone
Thanks
good article
Just fascinating how obsessed Trump is with the Russia investigation
He thinks Sessions job is not to enforce the law but simply to protect him
WTF
Quote: BozGuess the mods took a night off? Clinton rally perhaps??
I would like to think that political affiliation has nothing to do with our Administration. We were discussing whether or not what was said was a suspension-worthy offense, and if so, how long the suspension should be. We determined that it falls under Trolling/Bullying rather than Personal Insult.
In point of political affiliation not having anything to do with how Members are Administrated, if it were my decision and my decision only, this thread would not exist because it is not gambling-related. It is for that reason that I don't follow this thread (and would prefer not to be bothered with it) unless I am pimping a gambling article of mine with a political lean (elections betting, impeachment betting, etc...).
Finally, please refer any further discussion on this matter to the Discussion About the Suspension List thread. That is not an admonishment, I'm just saying that since ams288 is now suspended, that is now the proper thread...as of the time of your above post, he had not been suspended yet, of course.
Quote: Mission146
Finally, please refer any further discussion on this matter to the Discussion About the Suspension List thread. That is not an admonishment, I'm just saying that since ams288 is now suspended, that is now the proper thread...as of the time of your above post, he had not been suspended yet, of course.
You can still go back and forth with AMS over at http://diversitytomorrow.com/
Very active Trump discussions there also
I actually prefer http://diversitytomorrow.com/ over this forum
Much more diverse topics
Quote: terapinedYou can still go back and forth with AMS over at http://diversitytomorrow.com/
Very active Trump discussions there also
I actually prefer http://diversitytomorrow.com/ over this forum
Much more diverse topics
I knew there was a reason I've not logged in there since 11/28/2016.
I have my political opinions, but I prefer to only share them in the context of a one-on-one discussion in person or on the phone. The best you can ever hope for is to get someone to understand why you think the way you do, but you'll never convince a person to think the way you do. I really don't care whether someone thinks the way I do or not, nor do I care if they understand why I think the way I do, so en masse political discussions have zero value for me.
Quote: Mission146I knew there was a reason I've not logged in there since 11/28/2016.
I have my political opinions, but I prefer to only share them in the context of a one-on-one discussion in person or on the phone. The best you can ever hope for is to get someone to understand why you think the way you do, but you'll never convince a person to think the way you do. I really don't care whether someone thinks the way I do or not, nor do I care if they understand why I think the way I do, so en masse political discussions have zero value for me.
Its a great site
We discuss everthing. All topics. Life is much more interesting then just mostly gambling and a few other topics.
Most active thread - In the News today
The most intelligent WOV member in my opinion doesnt really post here anymore but he is active on DT, Pacomartin.
Quote: terapinedIts a great site
We discuss everthing. All topics. Life is much more interesting then just mostly gambling and a few other topics.
Most active thread - In the News today
The most intelligent WOV member in my opinion doesnt really post here anymore but he is active on DT, Pacomartin.
PacoMartin knocks me out. MVP of any forum he cared to join.
Quote: terapinedIts a great site
We discuss everthing. All topics. Life is much more interesting then just mostly gambling and a few other topics.
Most active thread - In the News today
The most intelligent WOV member in my opinion doesnt really post here anymore but he is active on DT, Pacomartin.
Yes, and it’s a shame he doesn’t post here anymore.
I also agree there is more to life than gambling, but gambling is the only subject I care to discuss with a large group of people in a message board setting.
Seriously, I’ve tried. I think everyone over there is terrific and I’ve posted a few weeks at a time here and there. At a certain point after a few days though, I look at, “Recent Threads,” and say, “I don’t care about any of this.”
I also don’t care about news, unless it’s gambling news. Otherwise, wake me when it’s over.
Quote: Mission146Yes, and it’s a shame he doesn’t post here anymore.
I also agree there is more to life than gambling, but gambling is the only subject I care to discuss with a large group of people in a message board setting.
Seriously, I’ve tried. I think everyone over there is terrific and I’ve posted a few weeks at a time here and there. At a certain point after a few days though, I look at, “Recent Threads,” and say, “I don’t care about any of this.”
I also don’t care about news, unless it’s gambling news. Otherwise, wake me when it’s over.
Yeah, I just looked at the last three pages of, “Recent Threads,” over there. With exception to the two NFL threads, I wouldn’t open any of them.
It wouldn’t even be worth logging in to give my uninformed and probably wrong opinion as to the specific things being discussed in those threads. Particularly not when nobody would, or even should, care what my uninformed, useless and likely wrong opinion is.
Uh Oh
It's another fake pee pee dossier, and
everybody wants to know why Trump
is suing? LOLOLOL!
"The author of the explosive new Trump book says he can't be sure if parts of it are true. Several of his sources, he says, were definitely lying to him, while some offered accounts that flatly contradicted those of others."
http://www.businessinsider.com/michael-wolff-note-says-he-doesnt-know-if-trump-book-is-all-true-2018-1
Quote: EvenBobWOLFF ADMITS: NOT SURE ALL TRUMP MATERIAL TRUE
Uh Oh
It's another fake pee pee dossier, and
everybody wants to know why Trump
is suing? LOLOLOL!
"The author of the explosive new Trump book says he can't be sure if parts of it are true. Several of his sources, he says, were definitely lying to him, while some offered accounts that flatly contradicted those of others."
http://www.businessinsider.com/michael-wolff-note-says-he-doesnt-know-if-trump-book-is-all-true-2018-1
Trump sues everyone so thats meaningless
However Wolff doesnt say he is telling untruths in the book. He is pointing out that people were telling him obvious lies so what those lies entailed plus other things he was told may not be accurate assessments
He However is accurately reporting these comments. As such a lawsuit would not be successful imo
In fact the type of behavior he is reporting on is similar to most trumpers who misquote and excise statements to frame their own twisted views
CRAGA!
