Thread Rating:
Poll
2 votes (7.69%) | |||
No votes (0%) | |||
No votes (0%) | |||
No votes (0%) | |||
19 votes (73.07%) | |||
No votes (0%) | |||
1 vote (3.84%) | |||
3 votes (11.53%) | |||
No votes (0%) | |||
1 vote (3.84%) |
26 members have voted
2 anecdotes:
1) When I was in college, I'd estimate that 90 percent of the freshman in my dorm consumed alcohol. In essence, this unrealistic law created outlaws out of just about everyone I knew as a freshman. When everyone's an outlaw, it makes a mockery of law and authority.
2) Earlier this year, a new neighbor moved in next door. My neighbor's younger brother is 19 and he has an ID card for "medical" cannabis in California. In other words, he can smoke pot legally in California, but he can't drink beer legally.
That said, those of us that are old enough to remember the day when the drinking age was 18, can probably remember the reasons it was changed: 18-20 year olds could not drink responsibly.
This does not mean that 21 year olds suddenly do learn responsibility, but the line has to be drawn somewhere.
Based upon that, I'd say keep it at 21.
On the other hand, back then, irresponsible drinking, and in particular driving while intoxicated, did not have the kind of stigma it has today. So, maybe if the drinking age were reduced to 18 today, it wouldn't be the problem it once was.
My folks, in fact, let my sisters and I enjoy an occasional sip of wine or beer with dinner when we were kids. Emphasis on occasional; no more than once a month, and never more than one glass. (Dad also got lots of speeding tickets, so they couldn't complain about my driving once I turned 16, either.)
And herein lies the problem in the US. In Europe, kids are introduced to alcohol gradually, and usually in the context of enjoying it with meals or with friends. Here, it's no drinking until you get to college, then start guzzling. Obviously their way is better, but I wouldn't know how to start reforming behavior here. To the extent it involves lowering the drinking age, it probably has to be done gradually, and with different ages for beer/wine vs. hard stuff and differentiating between purchasing and consuming in the company of older adults.
Quote: DJTeddyBearThat said, those of us that are old enough to remember the day when the drinking age was 18, can probably remember the reasons it was changed: 18-20 year olds could not drink responsibly.
Do you believe that American 20 year-olds are less responsible than all the 20 year olds in every other nation on our planet? (Excluding Sri Lanka, Fiji, & Pakistan, of course.) Is there something about American culture which makes our 20 year olds uniquely untrustworthy?
Quote: teddysAbsolutely the drinking age should be 18. 18-20s are going to drink. Making it illegal at that age is just going to encourage people to drink anyway. Did anyone watch the "Prohibition" documentary? "It is harder to get a drink now that it was during Prohibition." Enforcement? Don't get me started ... it's a joke ... just be done with it. The temperance movement (i.e. MADD) is still strong in this country, they've just changed tactics and aims.
It's so sad that MADD is now a temperance movement... It does them no favors.... MADD Canada seems to be firmly on th anti-drink driving campaign itself and slightly removed from the US groups craziness...
I've always been pretty amazed by the whole idea that at 18 people are mature enough to sign contracts, join the army, and do adult time for their crimes; but not mature enough to buy a beer.
was a horrible and dismal failure. It lasted
for 2 years, I think, and it killed teens in
droves. They would go to the bars, get wasted
and kill themselves and others on the way home.
It will never get passed, and if it does it'll be
repealed just like it was here.
Quote: EvenBobIn the 70's it was lowered to 18 in MI and it
was a horrible and dismal failure. It lasted
for 2 years, I think, and it killed teens in
droves. They would go to the bars, get wasted
and kill themselves and others on the way home.
It will never get passed, and if it does it'll be
repealed just like it was here.
Kind of why I would vote for to age 20 only, unless a military member on a military base club. IMHO one important thing is make it just so that the high school kids can't do it legally.
yeah, kids are going to do what kids do anyway, and drink younger than that: 18, 17, 15 on down even - but I see no advantage in making it even easier for them.
and why it didn't work in MI and elsewhere, is the
bar and club situation. The kids would get shitfaced
because they had no experience and die in drunk
driving accidents every day. Insurance rates skyrocketed
fro everybody. Its irresponsible to let 18 year old's
drink in bars and clubs, it'll never pass.
18 years olds drink in pubs and clubs in the UK, and most of Europe. I suspect the big difference is that old thing we've talked about before... public transit (and probably town density). There's less need to drive to a drinking establishment over there.
Though almost certainly, the number of Drink related accidents would fall in the UK if the drinking age was raised to 21... but it wouldn't be a massive change. Attitudes to drink driving are different there as well.
Quote: thecesspitThe problem would appear to be letting people get shit faced drunk and drive.
I owned a bar, its not that easy to tell if someone
is too drunk to drive. And if you've got 18yr old
kids who can get shitfaced on 3 beers, its impossible.
Quote: EvenBobI owned a bar, its not that easy to tell if someone
is too drunk to drive. And if you've got 18yr old
kids who can get shitfaced on 3 beers, its impossible.
You've been drinking - you shouldn't drive. It's really that simple. People will piss and moan and tell me "I'm okay after one" or "It's been a while since I had my last one". Whatever, either be the designated driver, or everyone gets a cab/bus/walks home. Don't be the dink who "thought he was alright", and then runs into the back of someone due to reaction times being dulled.
It's really quite simple. I also don't think it's necessarily the bar owner's job to police it, but I have no idea what the legal responsibility IS for a bar owner down there.
Drink driving numbers drop when there's a social stigma to being the arsehole who drink drives. Law enforcement helps, but peer group pressure works the best. I don't know the the 18-21 culture in the US. I'll take your word for it a drop in the drinking age won't work.
I'm just saying 18 year olds drink in the UK and Europe and it works fine.