mrsuit31
mrsuit31
Joined: May 29, 2010
  • Threads: 80
  • Posts: 1264
February 10th, 2019 at 8:17:34 AM permalink
Quote: jackmagic777

DEFINITELY the early line favorite for Raving 2019!!!!!!



Appreciate that!

Iíll probably hold off on making the Cuttig Edge exhibit decision for a while this year. Letís see how things are going over the next few months with the game, by there is a good chance youíll see it on the competition list :)
.
SM777
SM777
Joined: Apr 8, 2016
  • Threads: 6
  • Posts: 680
Thanks for this post from:
mrsuit31
February 10th, 2019 at 8:26:41 AM permalink
Quote: mrsuit31

This is the first round. I never like using the arch as I like showcasing the logo.

I want feedback to see what needs to be changed. Need other eyes like yours and everyone for that. No need to apologize! I am having the "1x Ante" change made to draw less attention, removing the "highest event pays" language as I agree and am minimizing the language a bit in between the Ante/Play wager circles and will see how that looks. That will be the first batch of changes.

This is what the Table looks like at the moment

.




Looks like WAY too much wording from overhead. Almost a nauseating amount. Maybe do the paytables in between two spots, so you don't have so much wording. Every two spots share the wording and paytables in between.

In big font somewhere, should say "Player gets 4 card, dealer gets 3" so passerbys can see the appeal of the game.
mrsuit31
mrsuit31
Joined: May 29, 2010
  • Threads: 80
  • Posts: 1264
February 10th, 2019 at 9:05:51 AM permalink
Quote: SM777

Quote: mrsuit31

This is the first round. I never like using the arch as I like showcasing the logo.

I want feedback to see what needs to be changed. Need other eyes like yours and everyone for that. No need to apologize! I am having the "1x Ante" change made to draw less attention, removing the "highest event pays" language as I agree and am minimizing the language a bit in between the Ante/Play wager circles and will see how that looks. That will be the first batch of changes.

This is what the Table looks like at the moment

.




Looks like WAY too much wording from overhead. Almost a nauseating amount. Maybe do the paytables in between two spots, so you don't have so much wording. Every two spots share the wording and paytables in between.

In big font somewhere, should say "Player gets 4 card, dealer gets 3" so passerbys can see the appeal of the game.



Iím having my designer remove some of the language and will try and shrink down the pay tables a bit.

Let me see what I can do with some of your suggestions otherwise. I will also see about placing the player 4 vs dealer 3 language on the table front and center.

Thanks SM777!
.
SM777
SM777
Joined: Apr 8, 2016
  • Threads: 6
  • Posts: 680
Thanks for this post from:
mrsuit31
February 10th, 2019 at 11:05:06 AM permalink
Quote: mrsuit31

Quote: SM777

Quote: mrsuit31

This is the first round. I never like using the arch as I like showcasing the logo.

I want feedback to see what needs to be changed. Need other eyes like yours and everyone for that. No need to apologize! I am having the "1x Ante" change made to draw less attention, removing the "highest event pays" language as I agree and am minimizing the language a bit in between the Ante/Play wager circles and will see how that looks. That will be the first batch of changes.

This is what the Table looks like at the moment

.




Looks like WAY too much wording from overhead. Almost a nauseating amount. Maybe do the paytables in between two spots, so you don't have so much wording. Every two spots share the wording and paytables in between.

In big font somewhere, should say "Player gets 4 card, dealer gets 3" so passerbys can see the appeal of the game.



Iím having my designer remove some of the language and will try and shrink down the pay tables a bit.

Let me see what I can do with some of your suggestions otherwise. I will also see about placing the player 4 vs dealer 3 language on the table front and center.

Thanks SM777!



It's definitely the appeal of the game, and the differentiating factor. Would be great IMO.

If you can get in big font somewhere on the layout, whether at the bottom where the players have chips, or at the top by the dealer cards, people who passby when the table is closed, or when there's 0 players can see why they should sit and play. Instead of having a dealer try to explain, they can see immediately I get more cards than the dealer.
mrsuit31
mrsuit31
Joined: May 29, 2010
  • Threads: 80
  • Posts: 1264
February 10th, 2019 at 11:54:03 AM permalink
Quote: SM777



It's definitely the appeal of the game, and the differentiating factor. Would be great IMO.

If you can get in big font somewhere on the layout, whether at the bottom where the players have chips, or at the top by the dealer cards, people who passby when the table is closed, or when there's 0 players can see why they should sit and play. Instead of having a dealer try to explain, they can see immediately I get more cards than the dealer.



I'm leaning towards the pay tables in between spots 6/5, 3/4 and 1/2 and having "PLAYER GETS 4 CARDS" to the left of the logo arching, and "DEALER GETS ONLY 3" or "DEALER GETS 3 Cards" on the right. Any preference to which I should use for the second phrase? I am liking the "DEALER GETS ONLY 3"....
Last edited by: mrsuit31 on Feb 10, 2019
.
jackmagic777
jackmagic777
Joined: Jan 11, 2019
  • Threads: 1
  • Posts: 161
Thanks for this post from:
mrsuit31
February 10th, 2019 at 1:39:02 PM permalink
CLASSIC 31 AND 3 CARD FURY. Best entry I have seen since Calumet Farms was winning the Derby every year
mrsuit31
mrsuit31
Joined: May 29, 2010
  • Threads: 80
  • Posts: 1264
Thanks for this post from:
MrCasinoGames
February 10th, 2019 at 2:04:08 PM permalink
Quote: jackmagic777

CLASSIC 31 AND 3 CARD FURY. Best entry I have seen since Calumet Farms was winning the Derby every year



In other news, 31 Classic is going live in Mississippi :-)

Pushing through the MGC now for trial approval (contracts already signed and submitted). Once approved I'll release the details of the trial.

Back to the 3 Card Fury Layout. I didn't like how the pay tables only between the 1/2, 3/4 and 5/6 spots looked so nixed that idea. I am going to keep the individual pay tables (slightly smaller), removing a few of the redundant rules and adding the "PLAYER GETS 4 CARDS" and "DEALER GETS ONLY 3" on the center table arch next to the logo.

I like the look and am not super concerned about it being to overwhelming. Its just two pay tables. The monster is what looks so big, because of the busted monster bonus section. Of course this can always be changed, but that will be the final version for now. I will post the final full table image when it is complete either later today or manana.
.
SOOPOO
SOOPOO
Joined: Aug 8, 2010
  • Threads: 100
  • Posts: 5591
Thanks for this post from:
mrsuit31
February 10th, 2019 at 2:25:21 PM permalink
Just played the demo. Lots of 'wins' result in no money plus or minus. Seems like a very low variance game. I think it has a real chance. I'll bet there will be 'weak' dealers that will yield a player advantage. Axel will be mad I wrote that.....
mrsuit31
mrsuit31
Joined: May 29, 2010
  • Threads: 80
  • Posts: 1264
February 10th, 2019 at 2:33:27 PM permalink
Quote: SOOPOO

Just played the demo. Lots of 'wins' result in no money plus or minus. Seems like a very low variance game. I think it has a real chance. I'll bet there will be 'weak' dealers that will yield a player advantage. Axel will be mad I wrote that.....



Thank you Soopoo!

The base game (Ante, Play & Monster) has an overall win rate of around 42%, overall push around 25% and an overall lose of around 33%. The Ante wins around 65% of the time. This should create a very fun, elongated time on device for players. The monster is very volatile to allow for a good deal of excitement and big streak potential to make a pretty penny as some have seen in the demo already.

The way the game will be dealt will eliminate any possibility of hole carding (bottom card of the dealer four card packet will be the discard, and the top three cards are slid into the dealer card boxes). The only thing I will need to stress is that the player's must beat the dealer to win the ante. That is the only place where I can see anything that needs attention. That said, if people are constantly deviating from optimal strategy of playing a Q high or better and playing Jack high or less repeatedly trying to take advantage of a weak dealer, that should be picked up almost immediately by any supervisor. As a result, Axel shouldn't get to mad at you for that one :-), I have to think about these things when creating procedures.......
.
SM777
SM777
Joined: Apr 8, 2016
  • Threads: 6
  • Posts: 680
Thanks for this post from:
mrsuit31
February 10th, 2019 at 2:42:12 PM permalink
Quote: mrsuit31

I'm leaning towards the pay tables in between spots 6/5, 3/4 and 1/2 and having "PLAYER GETS 4 CARDS" to the left of the logo arching, and "DEALER GETS ONLY 3" or "DEALER GETS 3 Cards" on the right. Any preference to which I should use for the second phrase? I am liking the "DEALER GETS ONLY 3"....



Dealer gets only 3 sounds good. For an industry with an extreme high failure rate, need to best play to the appeal of the game. Seems like a small detail, but could see it being helpful.

The paytables between will definitely help make it less busy. These two little changes will do wonders for people walking by. The less confusing they think it will be, the more they will give it a shot.

  • Jump to: