Partner wanted: Patented Blackjack Game

I need someone to help with monetization and distribution for a Patented Table game that has been approved in some venues. Mobile revenues also possible. Interested persons may check it out via free IPhone, iPad App, Three Card Blackjack.--- Also seen on website. www.twooutofthree21.com My contact info is on website.



Have issue with Go Daddy Hosting. Free iPhone & iPad App. is in Apple Store! Three Card Blackjack.
There is Dealer strategy ( Stanly Ko ) Player strategy is same. 2 card 21-20 -11-10-19-18 -17 - play 2 smallest cards ex: AA- A2 etc.

I'm going to allow this to remain as properly posted in the Game Inventor's Corner. Secondly, the OP has been a member here for a couple months and this is the Member's first post.

With that said, check out the website or privately contact the OP at your own risk.

Quote: Mission146

I'm going to allow this to remain as properly posted in the Game Inventor's Corner. Secondly, the OP has been a member here for a couple months and this is the Member's first post.

With that said, check out the website or privately contact the OP at your own risk.

I was on the fence about banning him myself. Was mulling it over. I like your approach, thanks.

I looked at this game briefly. It really needs something else to it. I think best would be receiving two cards with an option to buy a hit, and bonuses for certain combinations, like three card 21, 3 aces, point total of 30, but built into the main game so there's no side bet needed. The other thing could be "beat the dealer by x, for example if you get 3 aces for 33 points, and he gets 3 deuces for 6 points, you get 50-1 on your bet or something. Maybe make it two bets, the ante bet, and the total bet, where the total bet compares the total number of points, it pays on big discrepancies to give it a jackpot potential.

If Stanley Ko did the math' then that's a tick in the right box.

Unsure of how the game plays so my curiosity got the better of me and I tried the Java game but my browser kept blocking the application from opening.

So, none the wiser at this stage.

Mine blocked it too. I even tried to force it to allow and it still didn't want me to and blocked it.


ZCore13

Yup, demo doesn't seem to work. However from the how it's played section it immediately strikes me as to restrictive as its playing style. Not being able to split or double is unappealing to me since I think of those as some of the more exciting points of the game. H17 is no fun, though I'm used to playing with it. Blackjack paying even money is another huge turn off. I'm not sure how dealers would know which two cards to pick for themselves, unless there was some kind of house way. It's a cool idea, but with its limitations I'm not very enthusiastic about it.

Splitting I think would be a great strategy choice too, if you get XXY, where XX are the same, then you can split for a bet and have two hands of XY with an additional third card to each hand.

I really shoud play this game before commenting, but at first pass, it appears that the game reduces Blackjack down to a one decision game: pick two cards. After that decision is made the hand must be hit to 17 or stand if already over 17. That doesn't seem very engaging to me......but again, I would need to play before rendering a final opinion.

I agree the only decision seems to be which two cards to pick. I suspect restricting how the player plays may reduce the interest.

There have been similar BJ games.

"Players Choice" ( https://wizardofodds.com/games/players-choice-21/ ) which gave the player a choice of starting hands, but added a forced bet to get the House Edge. The splitting strategy wasn't instantly memorable (although I developed a crib sheet before playing it for real), but had the advantage that after that it was straight Blackjack.

"Never Bust" ( https://wizardofodds.com/games/never-bust-blackjack/ ) was a very simple game - when I saw it live most people found it exceedingly boring and were more interested in the sidebets. Also the dealer dealt it really fast since there were no decisions.

Quote: Paradigm

I really shoud play this game before commenting, but at first pass, it appears that the game reduces Blackjack down to a one decision game: pick two cards. After that decision is made the hand must be hit to 17 or stand if already over 17. That doesn't seem very engaging to me......but again, I would need to play before rendering a final opinion.

I think you've got it nailed down. I downloaded the game from the App Store and played a little while and my impression is exactly what you said.