Doesn't appear that Galaxy is sponsoring the winners this year, which is not surprising. I don't think they got much out of last year's sponsorship as War BJ didn't sign a deal with them. The Luck Bros didn't really need the offerings that were made for 2nd place and "3 to 1 Blackjack" already had a placement lined up in Kansas City.
What is curious is whether Galaxy or Bally/SHFL/SG or DEQ or other distributors are going to enter the competition this year. I say why not......you are going to have to compete against those games in front of a DTG, why not do it as part of the Raving competition. This isn't the Little League WS.....it is the table games biz and it is brutally competitive.
There were 30 games on the floor last year, but the ones from SHFL (2) and Galaxy (4) were not in the competition. I think there were only 24 games eligible for the voting.
www.tablegamesconf.com
If there is enough interest, perhaps we can have a WoV event immediately before or after.
ZCore13
Quote: Zcore13If I had my choice, I'd like to have Raving be for independent inventors looking to get their game to market or distributed. The big boys have enough money and distribution power to get any game they want in front of Table Games people. It's not going to kill me either way, but I'd rather it serve the hungry than those that have already made it.
ZCore13
Agreed
Quote: Zcore13If I had my choice, I'd like to have Raving be for independent inventors looking to get their game to market or distributed. The big boys have enough money and distribution power to get any game they want in front of Table Games people. It's not going to kill me either way, but I'd rather it serve the hungry than those that have already made it.
At $1,095 for a full pass, it may be prohibitive for the little guys. Most game inventors I've known were always singing the blues about money.
Quote: ParadigmThat is just to get in.....takes $3500 plus additional costs to actually exhibit.
Exactly the issue... Add table rental or purchase, felt, handouts, travel etc... $5000!
What would be an interesting idea would be for a distributor, if willing to incur the expense, would be to sponsor a little guy for the show. While having a prior agreement that if the game wins or places they will sign a distribution agreement with said distributor.
This would not only allow for good games who otherwise couldnt even consider showing up but would also really show that said company was joining the effort for innovation on the gaming floor, while simultaneously improving public image...
Perhaps Something that would be beneficial that AGS should consider... Or one day Money$uit Industries... ;)
Quote: Zcore13If I had my choice, I'd like to have Raving be for independent inventors looking to get their game to market or distributed. The big boys have enough money and distribution power to get any game they want in front of Table Games people. It's not going to kill me either way, but I'd rather it serve the hungry than those that have already made it.
I hear ya Z.......the independents clearly have the opportunity to be on the Raving Floor and will get the traffic due to the set up of the competition.
Do you think the bigs have an advantage in the voting? Even if they do, while winning the competition is great, Luck Bros got a placement after the 2012 show and didn't make the podium. I know of two games at last years show that got trials without hitting the podium. So the opportunity exists by just being present if your game is good enough.
I think holding the bigs out of the competition cheapens the prize. Every independent out there would love to take first place and say they beat everything that SHFL/Bally/Galaxy etc. had that year. To say you beat every other independent is still an accomplishment, but beating the big boys is the real deal.
Perhaps you limit games to ones with no more than 5 previous placements......that will keep the bigs from only entering their very latest concepts that no one has on their floor yet.
I guess there will always be suggestions for improvement. The real score here is how Raving has carved out such a great little niche for the Table Games industry and provided a more focused and more affordable venue for indies to get their games in front of the people that can make their games hit a floor somewhere for trial.
Quote: Zcore13If I had my choice, I'd like to have Raving be for independent inventors looking to get their game to market or distributed. The big boys have enough money and distribution power to get any game they want in front of Table Games people.
While I agree with what you're saying, would the show attract as many DTGs if the big boys weren't there?
Is it really $1,195 just to see the show??? Holy crap.
Quote: Zcore13If I had my choice, I'd like to have Raving be for independent inventors looking to get their game to market or distributed. The big boys have enough money and distribution power to get any game they want in front of Table Games people. It's not going to kill me either way, but I'd rather it serve the hungry than those that have already made it.
ZCore13
When it comes to making duds, the big boys are just as likely as the independents. They have the money and clout to get it installed, however the real voters are casino patrons not the guys at the Raving. Players vote with their money.
SHFL/Galaxy/DEQ are the not competition the independent should worry about. Using a golf analogy, the other players are not what golfers should worry about, it is the course.
So my final point is, if an independent worries about the big boys, get out of the business because you have to be much better then them to have a chance. Anything less and you will fail.
Quote: DJTeddyBearIs it really $1,195 just to see the show??? Holy crap.
Yup, Pretty nuts...
Quote: DJTeddyBearWhile I agree with what you're saying, would the show attract as many DTGs if the big boys weren't there?
Is it really $1,195 just to see the show??? Holy crap.
I think it would. Its about (or should be) new ideas and games who has the most money to provide free water and hot dealers for the participants.
Yes, it's $1,195, but it's not a show for the common person to attend. It's aimed at Table Games Directors and Staff. $1,195 once a year for a very focused event shouldn't be an issue for the budget. Especially for those ghat want to lead in the industry, not follow.
ZCore13
Yeah, I get that. No problem for those guys. Particularly since they have fat expense accounts.Quote: Zcore13Yes, it's $1,195, but it's not a show for the common person to attend. It's aimed at Table Games Directors and Staff. $1,195 once a year for a very focused event shouldn't be an issue for the budget. Especially for those that want to lead in the industry, not follow.
I was toying with going to see the format, and then entering Poker For Roulette next year. I guess I'll just have to go in blind.
ZCore13
If anybody else can remember sharing, please post. I am gonna email Dennis. Just don't seem right. Don't think the 20 limit will be a problem this year !
Quote: BuzzardI am pretty sure a couple showed 2 different versions of a game last year in same 10 by 10. No more sharing, no more Galaxy.
If anybody else can remember sharing, please post. I am gonna email Dennis. Just don't seem right. Don't think the 20 limit will be a problem this year !
I don't recall any sharing. If I remember correctly, across from SHFL was an Asian couple that had two games, but one faced SHFL and the other turned the corner and faced the wall to the right as you walked in the room. I'm pretty sure they had two booths.
ZCore13
$5000 is cheap. Name a couple of business that could turn into millions cost $5000 to start. You could find funds from friends, relatives or investors, or start saving. Some successful games did that.Quote: mrsuit31Exactly the issue... Add table rental or purchase, felt, handouts, travel etc... $5000!
Quote: UCivan$5000 is cheap. Name a couple of business that could turn into millions cost $5000 to start. You could find funds from friends, relatives or investors, or start saving. Some successful games did that.
Ur forgetting about a few small things like patents, math, marketing, artwork and the endless hours of people telling you to go F urself....
It's 5000 for a competition not to start a gaming company.
The above mentions thing will cost you between 20,000 to 50,000 and potentially years of unpaid work.
Tht 5000 is virtually nothing in the big picture
Name one game that entered a single competition without any of those things and now is worth millions. If you say war blackjack guess again. Read up on the company they have a wide array(supposedly) of games on there portfolios over years of gaming experience. You think that cost them 5000, if you do you are terribly mistaken.
Quote: Zcore13I don't recall any sharing. If I remember correctly, across from SHFL was an Asian couple that had two games, but one faced SHFL and the other turned the corner and faced the wall to the right as you walked in the room. I'm pretty sure they had two booths.
ZCore13
Not sure, but seems that warning about not sharing has a history behind it. And no big prize this year ?
Oh well, table game space at Bally and Galaxy will say a lot.
Quote: BuzzardNot sure, but seems that warning about not sharing has a history behind it. And no big prize this year ?
Oh well, table game space at Bally and Galaxy will say a lot.
Last year was the first and only year there has ever been anything other than floor placements at specific casinos. I don't think it will have much of an impact. The placements are huge for someone just getting started.
ZCore13
Quote: BuzzardDoes Bucky's even have a Roulette table? Just curious about the Luck Bros.
All live dealt games in Az must use cards. Dice, tiles, spinning balls are all illegal.
ZCore13
Quote: Zcore13Dice, tiles, spinning balls are all illegal.
Because the blue haired old ladies who run
AZ think they're evil..
Quote: BuzzardOh well, table game space at Bally and Galaxy will say a lot.
What is it going to say?
May see a renewed push for digital table game in both product lines. Just lots of things. Actions speak louder than words. No sponsorship at Raving sorta says something. Gavin cancelled as speaker last year at Raving at last moment to push merger. Will he even attend Raving this year?
I have no idea what it is going to say. But it will say something. I expect less space dedicated to actual live table games. But I have been wrong before, just in case you have not noticed.
Did you expect to see another Focus group in this decade ? I don't !
It's not just the format I'm interested in.Quote: Zcore13If you just want to see the format I'm sure I can arrange getting you in for a look. You won't be able to play any games or do anything, but you can at least check it out.
It's how many of the little guys will have eye candy. Or real candy or water, etc.
How is the flow of traffic. Are the participants under any pressure to see all booths, and/or is there a time limit (min & max) at each booth?
I suppose most of these details are covered in the package a presenter receives when he signs up, but I would have liked to roam the floor for a bit.
I've worked conventions, but this is different than anything I've done before.
Quote: ParadigmThe same must run CA as well :-)
Nope, at least AZ can use dice... Cali needs to get with the program!
Quote: mrsuit31Nope, at least AZ can use dice... Cali needs to get with the program!
No dice in Az.
ZCore13
Quote: Zcore13No dice in Az.
ZCore13
Yup I clearly misread your last post... whoops
Quote: mrsuit31Yup I clearly misread your last post... whoops
Fear not though... If I was a betting man I would not bet against me being the first to have live craps and or roulette in some form. There are a few very strong casinos in Phoenix and Tucson but I would not list myself as an underdog.
ZCore13
Quote: Zcore13Fear not though... If I was a betting man I would not bet against me being the first to have live craps and or roulette in some form. There are a few very strong casinos in Phoenix and Tucson but I would not list myself as an underdog.
ZCore13
Point taken.
Actually have a question for you... When it comes to the pai gow, are you allowed to use dice to determine the dealing position?
Quote: mrsuit31Point taken.
Actually have a question for you... When it comes to the pai gow, are you allowed to use dice to determine the dealing position?
I've never seen it. The only way I'd seen it determined I'd digital RNG. As far as I can recall in the State Compact, dice can not be used to determine ANY outcome within a live dealt game.
ZCore13
List of registered games
Looks like a good variety of blackjack, poker and dice with our own Paradigm showing the only roulette game.
ZCore13
Quote: ParadigmRoulette game is not mine, but the Luck Bros. "Lucky" & I are taking this year off from exhibiting at Raving, but I will be checking out the new games at the VIP Reception on Monday night. See you there Z!
Oops. Sorry about the mistake. Be good to see you Monday night. Looking forward to it.
ZCore13
Wait a sec...Quote: ParadigmRoulette game is not mine, but the Luck Bros. "Lucky" & I are taking this year off from exhibiting at Raving, but I will be checking out the new games at the VIP Reception on Monday night. See you there Z!
How are you doing that? Paying the full $1,195? Or is there a less expensive entry fee?
If I can get in for cheap just to see and get a feel for it, I'd sign up in a heartbeat.
August 8th, 2014 at 1:20:00 PM permalink
Zcore13
Member since: Nov 30, 2009
Threads: 14
Posts: 1282
If you just want to see the format I'm sure I can arrange getting you in for a look. You won't be able to play any games or do anything, but you can at least check it out.
ZCore13
I already saw Zcore's offer, and responded to it.
I won't be presenting Poker For Roulette, but I will be there, checking things out (but not voting). And, if all goes well, I'll be meeting with some folks at one of the table game companies to talk about my game.
So who else will be going to Raving? And indicate if you're going either presenting your game, or as an attendee checking things out, or otherwise.
A meet-up would be great. :)
GOOD LUCK
Regarding a meetup, how about after the show on Monday?
Should not have to do that. Not at the $5,000 minimum exhibitors will be out of pocket.